speedtest.net 60 C
🛡️ SEO 41 🤖 GEO 64 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 76

speedtest.net — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

speedtest.net
📊

With a solid 80/100 ACRI, speedtest.net is well-positioned for AI search — better than 94% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), speedtest.net performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. Token bloat registers at 13.9× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (41) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than speedtest.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)41 × 0.25 = 10.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)64 × 0.40 = 25.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 10.2 + 25.6 + 12.4 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #462
+6 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

speedtest.net shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why speedtest.net ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat13.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

41/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

52 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

72 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.speedtest.net/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Speedtest by Ookla - The Global Broadband Speed Test
  • ✓ og:description — Use Speedtest on all your devices with our free desktop and mobile apps.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

64/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
speedtest.net
53
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 85 elements (85 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words180
Raw Density47.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

61
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability61/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (10.0 KB)Bloat (128.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio13.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual ContextNo images detected
Image Alt Coverage0 / 0 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.8% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 2565 / Noise: 32988 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of speedtest.net and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Test internet connection performance including bandwidth, latency, coverage, video metrics.
Target Audience
Internet users, ISPs, carriers, businesses, universities, government agencies
Pricing Model
Free basic, paid enterprise options
🏆 Competitive Moat
Largest test volume with over 65 billion tests, global presence.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
location pagesdirectory listingscomparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No specific pain points mentioned in text
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-27 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1033 ms
Raw HTML Size138.9 KB
Visible Text Size10.0 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1033 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

769
DOM nodes
139 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

73
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 53/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for speedtest.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/speedtest.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=speedtest.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 370 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
53
Single-page score
+7
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
60
Avg across 370 pages · Range 36–90
Topical Cohesion
15%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
645675
Avg Bloat
45.0×
RAG Fractures [?]
105
⚠️
105 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 105 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/washington/spokane
Best Internet Providers in Spokane, Washington for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 10.0× 3585 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/minnesota/minneapolis
Best Internet Providers in Minneapolis, Minnesota for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.4× 4170 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/nevada/reno
Best Internet Providers in Reno, Nevada for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.0× 3605 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/california/santa-clarita
Best Internet Providers in Santa Clarita, California for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.6× 3153 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/maryland/baltimore
Best Internet Providers in Baltimore, Maryland for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.5× 3540 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/california/sacramento
Best Internet Providers in Sacramento, California for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.2× 3937 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/texas/sugar-land
Best Internet Providers in Sugar Land, Texas for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.6× 3400 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/arizona/tucson
Best Internet Providers in Tucson, Arizona for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 8.4× 4483 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/texas/irving
Best Internet Providers in Irving, Texas for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.0× 3508 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/new-york/new-york
Best Internet Providers in New York, New York for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 8.9× 3667 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/north-carolina/raleigh
Best Internet Providers in Raleigh, North Carolina for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.4× 3719 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/arizona/phoenix
Best Internet Providers in Phoenix, Arizona for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 8.5× 4905 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/texas/plano
Best Internet Providers in Plano, Texas for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.6× 3235 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/north-carolina/charlotte
Best Internet Providers in Charlotte, North Carolina for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.2× 3611 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/california/los-angeles
Best Internet Providers in Los Angeles, California for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.7× 3415 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/arizona/mesa
Best Internet Providers in Mesa, Arizona for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 8.4× 4206 💰 Pricing
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/indiana/indianapolis
Best Internet Providers in Indianapolis, Indiana for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 8.8× 3994 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/missouri/kansas-city
Best Internet Providers in Kansas City, Missouri for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.3× 4418 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/nevada/enterprise
Best Internet Providers in Enterprise, Nevada for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.1× 3616 💰 Pricing
https://www.speedtest.net/performance/united-states/louisiana/new-orleans
Best Internet Providers in New Orleans, Louisiana for 2026 | Speedtest
pricing 90 9.9× 3386 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/global-index/ 127 46 0% 60.8× High JS Bloat
/performance/ 120 85 0% 9.9× High JS Bloat
/nl/ 11 52 0% 51.0× High JS Bloat
/id/ 11 52 0% 56.0× High JS Bloat
/it/ 11 52 0% 52.9× High JS Bloat
/pl/ 11 52 0% 56.8× High JS Bloat
/de/ 11 52 0% 55.4× High JS Bloat
/es/ 11 52 0% 48.1× High JS Bloat
/sv/ 11 52 0% 56.0× High JS Bloat
/pt/ 11 52 0% 51.5× High JS Bloat
/ru/ 11 52 0% 55.3× High JS Bloat
/fr/ 11 52 0% 46.7× High JS Bloat
/mobile/ 5 42 0% 74.8× High JS Bloat
/about/ 2 46 0% 45.9× High JS Bloat
/help/ 1 67 0% 13.6× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 370 pages
rootmetrics.com ×370
status.ookla.com ×370
ekahau.com ×370
ziffdavis.com ×370
play.google.com ×370
downdetector.com ×370
twitter.com ×370
facebook.com ×370
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/speedtest.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to speedtest.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
speedtest.net (this site) 53 80 Express 13.9× 0
examsbook.com 78 89 Express 10.6× 5 Compare →
cashconverters.pt 78 87 Express 3.2× 1 Compare →
bonhommedebois.com 78 86 Express 4.8× 2 Compare →
mygenerator.com.au 78 86 Express 4.3× 2 Compare →
farmaciagaudiana.it 78 85 Express 3.5× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

46
Homepage ACRI
49
Inner Avg ACRI
-3
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
34%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
46 40% about https://www.speedtest.net/id/about
46 40% about https://www.speedtest.net/de/about
46 40% about https://www.speedtest.net/es/about
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 25/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

11 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

137
Total Links
11
Unique Domains
9.1
Avg/Page
8%
Diversity
downdetector.com play.google.com facebook.com ziffdavis.com ekahau.com rootmetrics.com status.ookla.com ookla.com twitter.com itunes.apple.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 27.4

AI trust scores for the domains speedtest.net links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to speedtest.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Speedtest",
  "url": "https://speedtest.net",
  "logo": "https://speedtest.net/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Speedtest",
  "url": "https://speedtest.net",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://speedtest.net/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for speedtest.net:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+15 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

10.0
AI-Trust
#408
Global Rank
77%
Percentile
39
Inbound AI Links
0
Outbound AI Links
50
Avg Inbound ACRI
15%
Invisible Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
2net.co.il 70 0.0 ← cites you
teluguprazalu.com 66 0.0 ← cites you
xenspec.com 65 0.0 ← cites you
three.co.uk 65 0.0 ← cites you
connect.az 64 0.0 ← cites you
cgi-communication.com 63 0.0 ← cites you
702com.net 61 0.0 ← cites you
wabash.net 60 0.0 ← cites you
imagine.ie 60 0.0 ← cites you
nccray.com 59 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →