safely.co.jp 64 C
🛡️ SEO 47 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 24 🏗️ Arch 82

safely.co.jp — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

safely.co.jp
📊

Registering an exceptional 90/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, safely.co.jp sits in the highest tier of AI extractability among indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), safely.co.jp performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 1.9× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Structured data coverage is solid at 3 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (24) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 24, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than safely.co.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)47 × 0.25 = 11.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)24 × 0.20 = 4.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)82 × 0.15 = 12.3
Weighted sum = 11.8 + 35.2 + 4.8 + 12.3
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
46
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #643109
-63 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 90/100

safely.co.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why safely.co.jp ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat1.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

47/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

108 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

477 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://safely.co.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 【公式】セーフリー|口コミ比較で失敗しない、安心の業者選びを提供します。
  • ✓ og:description — セーフリーでは、エアコンクリーニング、鍵のトラブル、害虫・害獣駆除、不要品買取、引越しなど、様々な暮らしのサービスに対応する近隣の業者を、口コミで比較・選定し、依頼することができます!地域に密着した業者を探すことで、迅速な対応が可能になります。アプリをダウンロードすることでポイントが貯まり、様々なサービスで交換可能!
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 6539 elements (6539 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words7221
Raw Density90.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

87
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability87/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

52%
🗑️ 48%
Useful Content (1167.8 KB)Bloat (996.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context92% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage663 / 720 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

78 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 46.0% · SNR: 1.17 · Signal: 298945 / Noise: 255039 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of safely.co.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
提供口コミ比較サービス以确保选择可靠的当地服务提供商
Target Audience
需要各种生活服务(如空调清洁、钥匙问题解决等)的消费者
Pricing Model
免费提供服务,通过积分兑换
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-25 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1840 ms
Raw HTML Size2164.0 KB
Visible Text Size1167.8 KB

Performance & Speed

24/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1840 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

19248
DOM nodes
2164 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

82/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://safely.co.jp/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

523
internal links
49
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

✓ TOP 5% AI-READY

🏆 You Are AI-Verified — Claim Your Badge

Your site scores 90/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index. Embed this trust badge on your site — every click sends visitors to your verified report and builds backlinks to your domain.

AI-Verified badge for safely.co.jp
Verified — updates automatically every 24h
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/safely.co.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=safely.co.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

How it works: The badge queries your ACRI score daily. If your score drops below 80 or your site hasn't been scanned in 30 days, the badge changes to "Pending Audit" (yellow) — prompting you to fix issues and rescan. Learn about ACRI methodology →

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to safely.co.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
safely.co.jp (this site) 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
tumi123.com 83 88 WordPress 1.7× 3 Compare →
kiralik-vincler.com 83 88 WordPress 1.7× 3 Compare →
beautycoiffure.com 83 90 WordPress 2.2× 3 Compare →
ilfriuli.it 85 90 WordPress 3.4× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history