peers.tv 64 C
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 72

peers.tv — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

peers.tv
📊

peers.tv shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 72/100, outperforming 73% of indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), peers.tv performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 15% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. A 7.1× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (27) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 30 snapshots
Feb 21 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than peers.tv?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)72 × 0.15 = 10.8
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 33.2 + 5.4 + 10.8
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
66
Structure
avg 36
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.8%
Rank #8196
+27 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 27%
Score 72/100

peers.tv punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why peers.tv ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat7.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

48 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

103 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://peers.tv/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Сервис онлайн-ТВ пирс Peers.TV
  • ✓ og:description — Онлайн телевидение и программа телепередач — Пирс, Peers.TV
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
peers.tv
63
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 66/100 — Good
Structured Elements 235 elements (235 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1801
Raw Density13.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

58
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability58/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (40/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

14%
🗑️ 86%
Useful Content (23.0 KB)Bloat (139.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.1× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context83% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage136 / 163 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 85.9% · SNR: 0.16 · Signal: 5900 / Noise: 35799 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of peers.tv and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Peers.TV provides free access to live TV and on-demand programs across various devices, offering a comprehensive viewing experience.
Target Audience
Users seeking free live TV streaming, TV show enthusiasts, and individuals looking for convenient access to television content on multiple devices.
Pricing Model
Free basic access with optional paid subscription for ad-free viewing and extended features (59 руб./мес).
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique combination of live TV, catch-up services, and personalized content curation, accessible on a wide range of devices.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
www.peers.tviOS devices : IPhone, IPad, IPodAndroid devices : Phones and TabletsSmart TVs: Samsung , LG , Panasonic
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Requires age verification and PIN code setup.
• Limited integration with third-party services.
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx/1.10.3 (Ubuntu)
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2324 ms
Raw HTML Size162.9 KB
Visible Text Size23.0 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2324 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1775
DOM nodes
163 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

72/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://peers.tv/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

241
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 63/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for peers.tv
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/peers.tv" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=peers.tv" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 960 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
63
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
65
Avg across 960 pages · Range 55–77
Total Words
876847
Avg Bloat
25.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://peers.tv/faq
support 77 6.0× 6742
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-21/
Телепрограмма за 21 february 2026. Живая природа HD
pricing 75 17.3× 2487 💰 Pricing
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-28/
Телепрограмма за 28 february 2026. Живая природа HD
pricing 75 17.6× 2416 💰 Pricing
https://peers.tv/smayliktv/program/2026-02-24/
Телепрограмма за 24 february 2026. СмайликТВ
other 75 17.1× 1757
https://peers.tv/smayliktv/program/2026-02-25/
Телепрограмма за 25 february 2026. СмайликТВ
other 75 17.2× 1758
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/
Живая природа HD. Смотреть онлайн эфир
other 75 17.6× 2436
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-19/
Телепрограмма за 19 february 2026. Живая природа HD
pricing 75 17.5× 2450 💰 Pricing
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-20/
Телепрограмма за 20 february 2026. Живая природа HD
pricing 75 17.5× 2436 💰 Pricing
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-22/
Телепрограмма за 22 february 2026. Живая природа HD
other 75 17.9× 2396
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-23/
Телепрограмма за 23 february 2026. Живая природа HD
pricing 75 17.3× 2479 💰 Pricing
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-24/
Телепрограмма за 24 february 2026. Живая природа HD
pricing 75 17.3× 2478 💰 Pricing
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-25/
Телепрограмма за 25 february 2026. Живая природа HD
pricing 75 17.3× 2478 💰 Pricing
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-26/
Телепрограмма за 26 february 2026. Живая природа HD
other 75 17.5× 2444
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-02-27/
Телепрограмма за 27 february 2026. Живая природа HD
pricing 75 17.3× 2464 💰 Pricing
https://peers.tv/zhivaya_priroda_hd/program/2026-03-01/
Телепрограмма за 1 march 2026. Живая природа HD
other 75 18.2× 2205
https://peers.tv/supergeroi/program/2026-02-21/
Телепрограмма за 21 february 2026. СуперГерои
pricing 72 17.0× 1558 💰 Pricing
https://peers.tv/smayliktv/
СмайликТВ. Смотреть онлайн эфир
other 72 17.4× 1683
https://peers.tv/nick_jr/program/2026-02-21/
Телепрограмма за 21 february 2026. Nick Jr.
other 72 16.0× 1644
https://peers.tv/nick_jr/program/2026-03-01/
Телепрограмма за 1 march 2026. Nick Jr.
other 72 18.6× 1262
https://peers.tv/smayliktv/program/2026-02-20/
Телепрограмма за 20 february 2026. СмайликТВ
other 72 17.9× 1605
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/red_line/ 14 67 0% 23.4× High JS Bloat
/nick_jr/ 12 72 0% 16.3× High JS Bloat
/shopping_live/ 12 66 0% 21.9× High JS Bloat
/cnl/ 12 67 0% 21.7× High JS Bloat
/svetloe_tv/ 12 72 0% 18.1× High JS Bloat
/boks_tv/ 12 68 0% 20.3× High JS Bloat
/supergeroi/ 12 72 0% 17.1× High JS Bloat
/zhivaya_priroda_hd/ 12 75 0% 17.6× High JS Bloat
/avto_24/ 12 67 0% 22.1× High JS Bloat
/minofideas/ 12 67 0% 22.9× High JS Bloat
/smayliktv/ 12 72 0% 18.0× High JS Bloat
/hd_sport/ 12 65 0% 23.4× High JS Bloat
/saga_tv/ 12 67 0% 21.7× High JS Bloat
/rustravel/ 11 67 0% 22.2× High JS Bloat
/chizhik/ 11 64 0% 25.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 960 pages
ok.ru ×960
b2b.peers.tv ×960
samsung.com ×960
ru.lgappstv.com ×960
redirect.appmetrica.yandex.com ×960
vk.com ×960
play.google.com ×1
smarttv.peers.tv ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/peers.tv

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to peers.tv. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
peers.tv (this site) 63 72 Custom / Proprietary 7.1× 1
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
churchfind.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite peers.tv when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

55
Homepage ACRI
64
Inner Avg ACRI
-9
ACRI Delta
50%
Homepage Ghost
46%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
63 50% other https://peers.tv/rustravel/valaamskiy_arhipelag_zima/
63 50% other https://peers.tv/rustravel/gidrosamolet_amfibiya_be_200chs/
63 50% other https://peers.tv/cnl/tserkov_blagaya_vest/
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 35/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

14 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

98
Total Links
14
Unique Domains
6.5
Avg/Page
14%
Diversity
b2b.peers.tv ok.ru vk.com samsung.com redirect.appmetrica.yandex.com ru.lgappstv.com itunes.apple.com smarttv.peers.tv play.google.com panasonic.net
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 21.0

AI trust scores for the domains peers.tv links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to peers.tv. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Peers",
  "url": "https://peers.tv",
  "logo": "https://peers.tv/i/ptv/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Peers",
  "url": "https://peers.tv",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://peers.tv/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Peers?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Peers does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Peers work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Peers."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for peers.tv:

Current Score
72
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history