consentmanager.net 66 C
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 79

consentmanager.net — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

consentmanager.net
📊

consentmanager.net shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 74/100, outperforming 78% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, consentmanager.net outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The 12.9× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (27) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 22 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than consentmanager.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 30.0 + 5.4 + 11.8
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
47
Structure
avg 36
4
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.4%
Rank #4217
+22 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

consentmanager.net punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why consentmanager.net ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat12.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

54 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

107 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 18
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.consentmanager.net/en/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
  • ✓ og:description — Consent management platform for websites. GDPR compliant. Over 30 languages, test your own design for free!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
consentmanager.net
64
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 47/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 201 elements (201 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2979
Raw Density6.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

48
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability48/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (19.7 KB)Bloat (233.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio12.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context95% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage263 / 276 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.2% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 5039 / Noise: 59765 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of consentmanager.net and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Consent Management Platform for GDPR, CCPA, and ePrivacy compliance
Target Audience
Website owners, publishers, online shops, agencies, data protection officers, international companies
Pricing Model
Flexible pricing model, pay-as-you-go, tiered plans from €23/month
🔗 Integration Partners
Google Consent Mode v2IAB TCF compatible CMPShopwareOXIDShopify
🛡️ Compliance Standards
GDPRePrivacyCCPA
🏆 Competitive Moat
Higher acceptance rates, lower bounce rates, comprehensive design flexibility, and extensive language support
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
CMP features comparison pagesLegal Shield support pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2828 ms
Raw HTML Size253.1 KB
Visible Text Size19.7 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2828 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2357
DOM nodes
253 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

123
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 64/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for consentmanager.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/consentmanager.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=consentmanager.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 16 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
64
Single-page score
+8
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
72
Avg across 16 pages · Range 72–72
Total Words
42160
Avg Bloat
19.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://consentmanager.net/api
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/pricing
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/about
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/help
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/products
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/solutions
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/features
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/docs
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/blog
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/case-studies
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/integrations
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/faq
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/contact
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/careers
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/privacy
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
https://consentmanager.net/terms
The leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) for GDPR
pricing 72 19.7× 2635 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/features/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/privacy/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/help/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/api/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/terms/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/careers/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 16 pages
2duij7.share-eu1.hsforms.com ×16
help.consentmanager.net ×16
xing.com ×16
linkedin.com ×16
app.consentmanager.net ×16
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/consentmanager.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to consentmanager.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
consentmanager.net (this site) 64 74 WordPress 12.9× 2
grupocasalima.com 87 96 WordPress 11.4× 5 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 89 WordPress 3.0× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
tool-off.com 89 99 WordPress 7.3× 33 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

72
Homepage ACRI
72
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
20%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
72 20% pricing https://consentmanager.net/about
72 20% pricing https://consentmanager.net/products
72 20% pricing https://consentmanager.net/features
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

5 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

75
Total Links
5
Unique Domains
5.0
Avg/Page
7%
Diversity
linkedin.com xing.com app.consentmanager.net help.consentmanager.net 2duij7.share-eu1.hsforms.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 25.7

AI trust scores for the domains consentmanager.net links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to consentmanager.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Consentmanager",
  "url": "https://consentmanager.net",
  "logo": "https://www.consentmanager.net/en/wp-content/themes/cmstheme/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for consentmanager.net:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+11 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history