tool-off.com 78 B
🛡️ SEO 88 🤖 GEO 93 ⚡ Perf 33 🏗️ Arch 81

tool-off.com — Global SEODiff Score 78/100

tool-off.com
📊

Registering an exceptional 99/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, tool-off.com sits in the highest tier of AI extractability among indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, tool-off.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 7.4× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. With 33 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

78
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (33) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than tool-off.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)88 × 0.25 = 22.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)93 × 0.40 = 37.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)33 × 0.20 = 6.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 22.0 + 37.2 + 6.6 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 78 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
100
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #689864
-67 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 99/100

tool-off.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why tool-off.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage33 blocks
Token bloat7.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

88/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

54 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

461 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 25
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://tool-off.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 工具の買取&高額で売るならツールオフ
  • ✓ og:description — 中古工具を高価買取!電動工具、エア工具、エンジン工具、ハンドツール、電線等お買取り致します!東京、埼玉、神奈川、千葉、群馬、大阪を中心とする、工具専門の買取販売店ツールオフです!店頭買取/宅配買取/出張買取/LINE査定/テレビ電話査定等、全て無料でご利用頂けますので、お気軽にお問合せ下さい!フリーダイヤル:0120-590-220
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

93/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
tool-off.com
89
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 619 elements (619 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1916
Raw Density32.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks33 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

6/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

94
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability94/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (44.7 KB)Bloat (287.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.4× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context91% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage224 / 247 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.5% · SNR: 0.16 · Signal: 11447 / Noise: 73593 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of tool-off.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
工具的高价值回收
Target Audience
工具用户和企业
Pricing Model
免费评估,高价回收
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-25 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1682 ms
Raw HTML Size332.2 KB
Visible Text Size44.7 KB

Performance & Speed

33/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1682 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4694
DOM nodes
332 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://tool-off.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

272
internal links
43
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

✓ TOP 15% AI-READY

🏆 You Are AI-Verified — Claim Your Badge

Your site scores 89/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index. Embed this trust badge on your site — every click sends visitors to your verified report and builds backlinks to your domain.

AI-Verified badge for tool-off.com
Verified — updates automatically every 24h
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/tool-off.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=tool-off.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

How it works: The badge queries your ACRI score daily. If your score drops below 80 or your site hasn't been scanned in 30 days, the badge changes to "Pending Audit" (yellow) — prompting you to fix issues and rescan. Learn about ACRI methodology →

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to tool-off.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
tool-off.com (this site) 89 99 WordPress 7.4× 33
reidasmultimidias.com.br 82 93 WordPress 5.3× 31 Compare →
onlinepokiegame.com 68 79 WordPress 5.9× 33 Compare →
damoaberry.com 84 97 WordPress 7.1× 4 Compare →
hvaclibertyvilleil.com 84 97 WordPress 7.1× 4 Compare →
shigyo.co.jp 82 90 WordPress 6.8× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for tool-off.com:

Current Score
99
Projected Score
100
Improvement
+1 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history