plodopitomnik-sad.ru 72 B
🛡️ SEO 69 🤖 GEO 93 ⚡ Perf 28 🏗️ Arch 81
Radar → Domains → plodopitomnik-sad.ru

plodopitomnik-sad.ru — Global SEODiff Score 72/100

plodopitomnik-sad.ru
📊

plodopitomnik-sad.ru demonstrates elite AI-Readiness, achieving an ACRI of 95/100 — placing it in the top 99% of all indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A tight 3.1× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. With 12 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

72
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (28) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
69
🛡️ Traditional SEO
93
🤖 AI Readiness
28
⚡ Performance
81
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than plodopitomnik-sad.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)69 × 0.25 = 17.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)93 × 0.40 = 37.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)28 × 0.20 = 5.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 17.2 + 37.2 + 5.6 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 72 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
100
Schema
avg 10
55
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #989014
-97 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 95/100

plodopitomnik-sad.ru ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why plodopitomnik-sad.ru ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industryinfrastructure
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage12 blocks
Token bloat3.1×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other Express sites → infrastructure industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

69/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

116 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

210 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Саженцы купить в Москве в интернет-магазине питомника растений
  • ✓ og:description — Купить саженцы в Москве от питомника растений «Сад» ⏩ Бережная упаковка. ⭕ Доставка почтой по СНГ ⏩ Опт и розница.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

93/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 1048 elements (1045 lists, 3 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2483
Raw Density42.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks12 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

100
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability100/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

32%
🗑️ 68%
Useful Content (162.0 KB)Bloat (342.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context89% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage216 / 242 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

48 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 67.9% · SNR: 0.47 · Signal: 41482 / Noise: 87626 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of plodopitomnik-sad.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Sell saplings online in Moscow
Target Audience
Home gardeners and landscapers in Moscow
Pricing Model
Not specified
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-25 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time1599 ms
Raw HTML Size504.3 KB
Visible Text Size162.0 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

28/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1599 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4936
DOM nodes
504 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

3
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://plodopitomnik-sad.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1116
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

✓ TOP 5% AI-READY

🏆 You Are AI-Verified — Claim Your Badge

Your site scores 90/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index. Embed this trust badge on your site — every click sends visitors to your verified report and builds backlinks to your domain.

AI-Verified badge for plodopitomnik-sad.ru
Verified — updates automatically every 24h 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/plodopitomnik-sad.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=plodopitomnik-sad.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

How it works: The badge queries your ACRI score daily. If your score drops below 80 or your site hasn't been scanned in 30 days, the badge changes to "Pending Audit" (yellow) — prompting you to fix issues and rescan. Learn about ACRI methodology →

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to plodopitomnik-sad.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
plodopitomnik-sad.ru (this site) 90 95 Express 3.1× 12 —
sos-zubehoer.de 88 95 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
sos-ricambi.it 86 94 Express 2.5× 13 Compare →
sos-accessoire.com 86 93 Express 2.5× 13 Compare →
sos-parts.com 85 94 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
rockcity.com.br 81 86 Express 3.5× 11 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.