aryaka.com 78 B
🛡️ SEO 74 🤖 GEO 86 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 80

aryaka.com — Global SEODiff Score 78/100

aryaka.com
📊

With an ACRI of 88/100, aryaka.com stands out as one of the highest-performing sites in AI search visibility, outranking 99% of its peers. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), aryaka.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The 7.5× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

78
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (65) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than aryaka.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)74 × 0.25 = 18.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)86 × 0.40 = 34.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 18.5 + 34.4 + 13.0 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 78 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
62
Structure
avg 36
82
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 17%
Rank #171992
-16 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 88/100

aryaka.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 17%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why aryaka.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat7.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

74/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

71 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

146 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 3
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.aryaka.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Aryaka Unified SASE: Secure Network Access With Agility And Performance
  • ✓ og:description — Discover Aryaka's Unified SASE solution for secure, agile network access. Boost performance, reduce costs, and scale connectivity. Learn more now!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

86/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
aryaka.com
71
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 62/100 — Good
Structured Elements 128 elements (128 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1096
Raw Density11.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

77
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability77/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (17.7 KB)Bloat (114.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.5× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context79% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage62 / 78 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.6% · SNR: 0.15 · Signal: 4536 / Noise: 29352 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time746 ms
Raw HTML Size132.4 KB
Visible Text Size17.7 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

746 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

987
DOM nodes
132 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=3600
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://aryaka.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

134
internal links
14
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 71/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for aryaka.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/aryaka.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=aryaka.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
71
Single-page score
-22
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
49
Avg across 10 pages · Range 34–85
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 71, but internal pages average only 49 — a -22-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
11844
Avg Bloat
210.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://aryaka.com/faq
Security FAQs | Universal ZTNA, AI Secure & Next-Gen DLP | Aryaka
pricing 85 9.4× 2809 💰 Pricing
https://aryaka.com/blog
SD-WAN And SASE Blog: Network Evolution & Security Insights
pricing 75 15.0× 7816 💰 Pricing
https://aryaka.com/case-studies
Aryaka Unified SASE: Secure Network Access With Agility And Performance
pricing 67 33.3× 815 💰 Pricing
https://aryaka.com/docs
Page Moved
docs 52 3.4× 14
https://aryaka.com/contact
Contact Aryaka: Global Headquarters & Support Center
pricing 44 178.2× 140 💰 Pricing
https://aryaka.com/pricing
Page Not Found | Aryaka
pricing 34 373.1× 50 💰 Pricing
https://aryaka.com/about
Page Not Found | Aryaka
pricing 34 373.1× 50 💰 Pricing
https://aryaka.com/products
Page Not Found | Aryaka
pricing 34 373.1× 50 💰 Pricing
https://aryaka.com/features
Page Not Found | Aryaka
pricing 34 373.1× 50 💰 Pricing
https://aryaka.com/integrations
Page Not Found | Aryaka
pricing 34 373.1× 50 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 34 0% 373.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 34 0% 373.1× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 34 0% 373.1× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 85 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 75 0% 15.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 34 0% 373.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 34 0% 373.1× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 67 0% 33.3× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 52 0% 3.4× Thin Content
/contact/ 1 44 0% 178.2× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/aryaka.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to aryaka.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
aryaka.com (this site) 71 88 WordPress 7.5× 1
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
grupocasalima.com 87 96 WordPress 11.4× 5 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 89 WordPress 3.0× 5 Compare →
tool-off.com 89 99 WordPress 7.3× 33 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to aryaka.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Aryaka",
  "url": "https://aryaka.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://aryaka.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for aryaka.com:

Current Score
88
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+7 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history