amplify.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 68 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 91

amplify.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

amplify.com
📊

amplify.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 81/100, outperforming 95% of indexed domains. In the education sector, amplify.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. Heavy markup overhead (23.4× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (23×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than amplify.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)68 × 0.40 = 27.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)91 × 0.15 = 13.7
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 27.2 + 6.8 + 13.7
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
58
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.6%
Rank #6198
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

amplify.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why amplify.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryeducation
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat23.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

65 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

143 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://amplify.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Home Page
  • ✓ og:description — Amplify partners with K–12 teachers to make learning rigorous and riveting for every student. Learn more about our curriculums & assessments.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

68/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the education sector, educationdirectory.com.au (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
amplify.com
64
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. educationdirectory.com.au has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 58/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 199 elements (199 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1968
Raw Density10.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

57
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability57/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (95/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (24.0 KB)Bloat (538.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio23.4× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context89% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage17 / 19 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 562.4 KB, but only 24.0 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (23.4×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.7% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 6146 / Noise: 137832 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1833 ms
Raw HTML Size562.4 KB
Visible Text Size24.0 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1833 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1761
DOM nodes
562 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=15552000, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
js.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

91/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://amplify.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

196
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 64/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for amplify.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/amplify.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=amplify.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar education Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to amplify.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
amplify.com (this site) 64 81 WordPress 23.4× 1
sankardevcollege.edu.in 64 81 WordPress 23.3× 1 Compare →
ulifeline.org 64 82 WordPress 23.1× 1 Compare →
isls.org 63 83 WordPress 23.2× 1 Compare →
funwithmama.com 65 85 WordPress 23.6× 1 Compare →
spalding.edu 64 83 WordPress 22.5× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
👻

Rendering Drop-Off by Depth

DEPTH PENALTY 977 PAGES
0%
Homepage Ghost
39%
Deep Pages Avg Ghost
5%
Homepage Bloat
370%
Deep Pages Avg Bloat
Ghost Ratio by Crawl Depth
Depth 0
0%
1 pg · ACRI 82
Orphan
39%
976 pg · ACRI 58
⚠️ Worst Rendering Pages
40% https://amplify.com/programs-delete/ orphan
40% https://amplify.com/modal-test/ orphan
70% https://amplify.com/desmos-classroompodcast/ orphan
70% https://amplify.com/desmos-classroom-blog/ orphan
40% https://amplify.com/thank-you-for-nominating-a-science-of-reading-star/ orphan
Deeper pages lose rendering fidelity. Pages at depth 4+ often show 2-3× higher ghost ratios than the homepage, meaning AI crawlers see progressively less of your actual content as they navigate deeper into the site architecture.
🏗️

Deep Architecture Health & Equity Distribution

977 PAGES
84.9%
Gini Inequality
Extreme hoarding
85%
Top-3 PR Share
Equity held by 3 pages
976
Orphan Pages
99.9% of site
0.0
Avg Click Depth
Max: 0 clicks
0
Internal Links
976 disconnected
14%
Semantic Cohesion
Topical Drift
0% Healthy (receive equity)
0% Diluted hubs (>50 outbound)
100% Orphans (zero inbound)
🔗 Top Hub Pages (Highest PageRank)
https://amplify.com/s6-e1-the-other-side-of-scarboroughs-rope-with-margaret-goldberg-blog/ https://amplify.com/s6-e9-lessons-from-a-talking-dog-tvs-reading-buddies-on-making-learning-fun-blog/ https://amplify.com/texastutoring/ https://amplify.com/special-miniseries-blog/ https://amplify.com/sor-the-podcast-clone/
⚠️
976 orphan pages receive zero internal link equity. A Gini coefficient of 0.85 means the top 3 pages hoard 85% of all internal PageRank — AI crawlers may never discover the rest.
The Gini coefficient measures link equity inequality across your site. A Gini of 0.85 indicates severe equity hoarding — a handful of pages dominate PageRank while hundreds starve. AI crawlers penalize this by ignoring deep pages.
🔄

Semantic Cannibalization

critical 670 TOPICS
670
Topic Clusters
via TF-IDF cosine, ε=.60
381
Cannibal Pairs
>92% cosine similarity
Critical
Severity
>50 pairs
Cannibalizing Page Groups
🔴 shpm, pdf, frxtd 100% avg similarity · ACRI 66–66
  • https://amplify.com/change-management-playbook-blog/
  • https://amplify.com/literacy-changemanagement-playbook-blog/
🔴 they, feat, explore 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://amplify.com/page-with-medium-amount-of-content/
  • https://amplify.com/the-science-of-reading-for-blog/
  • https://amplify.com/amplify-literacy-hub/
  • https://amplify.com/science-of-reading/
  • https://amplify.com/science-of-reading-resource-siteblog/
🔴 footer, engage, offering 100% avg similarity · ACRI 56–56
  • https://amplify.com/free-professional-learning-webinars-for-math-educatorspodcast/
  • https://amplify.com/desmos-classroom-webinar-blog/
  • https://amplify.com/math-webinars-registration-page-blog/
🔴 for, anytime, district 100% avg similarity · ACRI 54–54
  • https://amplify.com/contact
  • https://amplify.com/support/
🔴 educators, see, build 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://amplify.com/programs/amplify-desmos-math/
  • https://amplify.com/desmos-math-6-a1-for-blog/
  • https://amplify.com/amplify-faq/
  • https://amplify.com/amplify-desmos-math-blog/
🔴 criteria, risk, insights 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://amplify.com/boost-readingblog/
  • https://amplify.com/programs/boost-reading/
🔴 every, create, providing 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://amplify.com/caregiver-hub/amplify-desmos-math/
  • https://amplify.com/math-sandi-families/
🔴 post, engagement, built 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://amplify.com/blog/science-classroom/the-power-of-phenomena-in-the-science-classroom/
  • https://amplify.com/the-power-of-phenomena-in-the-science-classroom-blog/
🔴 uniquely, this, let 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://amplify.com/blog/podcast-recaps-resources/integrating-literacy-in-the-science-classroom/
  • https://amplify.com/integrating-literacy-in-the-science-classroom/
🔴 how, later, exploratorium 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://amplify.com/blog/podcast-recaps-resources/bringing-joy-to-learning-in-the-science-classroom/
  • https://amplify.com/bringing-joy-to-learning-in-the-science-classroom/
Cannibalization occurs when multiple pages target the same semantic space (>92% cosine similarity). AI models pick one authoritative page and ignore duplicates — the losing page gets zero citations. Merging or differentiating cannibalizing pages is the highest-ROI fix for most sites.
Get a full merge/redirect plan for all 381 cannibalizing pairs
Unlock Merge Recommendations →
🧬

Entity Knowledge Gap Analysis

8 MISSING 62% COVERAGE
Extracted from Content (13)
SSO 847× 36% Go 664× 38% REST 120× 10% Rust 29× 2% Segment 20× 1% AWS 10× 1% GCP 4× 0% HubSpot 3× 0% SOC 2 2× 0% Python 1× 0% React 1× 0% Linear 1× 0% OAuth 1× 0%
📋 Declared in JSON-LD (8)
Amplify Amplify Education Amplify Science K-8 Nurturing Math Curiosity With Learners in Grades K–2 Solution Tree TGR Foundation TheSketchPerspective edWeb
⚠️ 8 entities mentioned in content but missing from structured data:
SSO Go REST Rust Segment AWS GCP HubSpot
Each missing entity is a lost opportunity for rich snippet inclusion and AI knowledge graph integration.
Schema Coverage: 8 declared vs 13 extracted — 62% coverage Entities with <100% coverage create knowledge graph blind spots for AI systems
🧭

Semantic Nearest Neighbors

View all →
ace.edu
High quality online education at a low cost
48%
Overlap
76
ACRI
Compare
45%
Overlap
64
ACRI
Compare
44%
Overlap
35
ACRI
Compare
achs.edu
Accredited online degree and certificate programs in holistic health and wellness
44%
Overlap
76
ACRI
Compare
43%
Overlap
74
ACRI
Compare
View All Semantic Alternatives → 📚 Docs Quality Index →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

D 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

54
Homepage ACRI
52
Inner Avg ACRI
+2
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
40%
Inner Avg Ghost
47
Drift Score
Worst Inner Pages
54 40% pricing https://amplify.com/contact
34 40% pricing https://amplify.com/integrations
54 40% pricing https://amplify.com/blog/science-of-reading/4-tools-to-help-teachers-better-understand-dyslexia/
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 25/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Named leadership: Aaron Harnly, Jessica Durow, Jessica Durow
🔗

Citation Profile

21 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

183
Total Links
21
Unique Domains
12.2
Avg/Page
12%
Diversity
youtube.com go.info.amplify.com learning.amplify.com classroom.amplify.com linkedin.com service.amplify.com myshop.amplify.com instagram.com twitter.com facebook.com
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to amplify.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Amplify?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Amplify does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Amplify work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Amplify."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for amplify.com:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history