withgoogle.com 40 D
🛡️ SEO 6 🤖 GEO 37 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 60

withgoogle.com — Global SEODiff Score 40/100

withgoogle.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for withgoogle.com is strong: an ACRI of 82/100 places it ahead of 96% of domains in the index. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), withgoogle.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

40
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (6) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (170×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 27, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 25 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 27
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than withgoogle.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)6 × 0.25 = 1.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)37 × 0.40 = 14.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)60 × 0.15 = 9.0
Weighted sum = 1.5 + 14.8 + 14.8 + 9.0
Global SEODiff Score = 40 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
65
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #674
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

withgoogle.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why withgoogle.com ranks here

Tech stackBlogger
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

6/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

6 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✗ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-CA
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

37/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
withgoogle.com
35
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 26 elements (25 lists, 1 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words47
Raw Density55.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

56
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability56/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (45/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (323 B)Bloat (53.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage1 / 1 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 53.5 KB, but only 323 B is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.4% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 80 / Noise: 13617 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkBlogger
AI-Readiness Score65/100
Servergws
CDNgoogle
HTTP Status200
Load Time761 ms
Raw HTML Size53.5 KB
Visible Text Size323 B

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

761 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

160
DOM nodes
54 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → google

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

60/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

7
internal links
23
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-CA
  • ✗ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 35/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for withgoogle.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/withgoogle.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=withgoogle.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 16 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
35
Single-page score
-5
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
31
Avg across 16 pages · Range 30–31
Topical Cohesion
95%
Strong Alignment
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
708
Avg Bloat
285.9×
RAG Fractures [?]
2
⚠️
2 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 2 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://withgoogle.com/api
Google
pricing 31 232.7× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/about
Google
pricing 31 234.3× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/help
Google
pricing 31 233.2× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/products
Google
pricing 31 234.6× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/features
Google
pricing 31 234.1× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/solutions
Google
pricing 31 232.9× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/blog
Google
pricing 31 234.3× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/docs
Google
pricing 31 233.9× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/case-studies
Google
pricing 31 232.6× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/contact
Google
pricing 31 234.2× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/faq
Google
pricing 31 234.2× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/careers
Google
pricing 31 234.7× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/terms
Google
pricing 31 234.3× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/privacy
Google
pricing 31 234.0× 47 💰 Pricing
https://withgoogle.com/pricing
Google
pricing 30 649.2× 25 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://withgoogle.com/integrations
Google
pricing 30 651.4× 25 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/terms/ 1 31 1% 234.3× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 31 1% 232.6× Bot Blocked
/careers/ 1 31 1% 234.7× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 31 1% 233.9× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 31 1% 234.2× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 31 1% 234.3× Bot Blocked
/privacy/ 1 31 1% 234.0× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 30 1% 649.2× Bot Blocked
/help/ 1 31 1% 233.2× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 31 1% 234.1× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 31 1% 234.6× Bot Blocked
/solutions/ 1 31 1% 232.9× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 31 1% 234.2× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 30 1% 651.5× Bot Blocked
/api/ 1 31 1% 232.7× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 16 pages
mail.google.com ×16
google.ca ×16
google.com ×16
accounts.google.com ×16
docs.google.com ×14
blogger.com ×14
maps.google.ca ×14
photos.google.com ×14
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/withgoogle.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to withgoogle.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
withgoogle.com (this site) 35 82 Blogger 169.6× 0
nl.imgbb.com 60 78 Blogger 9.3× 0 Compare →
monodigital.ru 60 74 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 0 Compare →
fanyi.pdf365.cn 60 83 Nuxt.js 5.3× 0 Compare →
anyang.to8to.com 60 79 Custom / Proprietary 7.1× 0 Compare →
viterra.com.br 60 72 Sitecore 2.4× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

30
Homepage ACRI
31
Inner Avg ACRI
-1
ACRI Delta
70%
Homepage Ghost
61%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
30 70% pricing https://withgoogle.com/integrations
31 60% pricing https://withgoogle.com/faq
31 60% pricing https://withgoogle.com/features
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

15 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

203
Total Links
15
Unique Domains
13.5
Avg/Page
7%
Diversity
google.ca google.com mail.google.com accounts.google.com youtube.com books.google.ca photos.google.com blogger.com maps.google.ca drive.google.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 50.8

AI trust scores for the domains withgoogle.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to withgoogle.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Withgoogle",
  "url": "https://withgoogle.com",
  "logo": "https://withgoogle.com/logo.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Withgoogle",
  "url": "https://withgoogle.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://withgoogle.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for withgoogle.com:

Current Score
82
Projected Score
97
Improvement
+15 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history