wassenaar.org 70 B
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 73 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 79

wassenaar.org — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

wassenaar.org
📊

At 81/100, the ACRI for wassenaar.org indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), wassenaar.org performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The 14.9× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (58) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 23 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than wassenaar.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)73 × 0.40 = 29.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 29.2 + 14.8 + 11.8
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
84
Structure
avg 36
2
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.5%
Rank #5185
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

wassenaar.org has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why wassenaar.org ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat14.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

32 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.wassenaar.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
  • ✓ og:description — Read more Contact Wassenaar Arrangement Secretariat Vienna, Austria Contact us Introduction The Wassenaar Arrangement has been established in order to contribute to regional and international security and stability, by promoting transparency and greater responsibility in transfers of conventional arms and dual-use goods and technologies, thus preventing destabilising accumulations. The aim is also to prevent the … Continued
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

73/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
wassenaar.org
59
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 84/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 66 elements (66 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words314
Raw Density21.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

57
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability57/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

6%
🗑️ 94%
Useful Content (4.1 KB)Bloat (57.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio14.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context58% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage15 / 26 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 93.3% · SNR: 0.07 · Signal: 1058 / Noise: 14681 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of wassenaar.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The Wassenaar Arrangement facilitates transparency and responsible transfers of dual-use goods and technologies for global security.
Target Audience
Government officials, international organizations, security analysts, and compliance professionals.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Maintaining a comprehensive and up-to-date database of controlled goods and technologies, coupled with expert guidance on compliance.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin FAQ page
• Lack of clear pricing information
• Limited search functionality
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time953 ms
Raw HTML Size61.5 KB
Visible Text Size4.1 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

953 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

391
DOM nodes
62 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

82
internal links
2
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 59/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for wassenaar.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/wassenaar.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=wassenaar.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 23 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
59
Single-page score
-5
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
54
Avg across 23 pages · Range 54–54
Total Words
4646
Avg Bloat
62.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://wassenaar.org/api
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
docs 54 62.4× 202
https://wassenaar.org/pricing
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
pricing 54 62.4× 202
https://wassenaar.org/guides
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
blog 54 61.9× 202
https://wassenaar.org/resources
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
blog 54 62.0× 202
https://wassenaar.org/help
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
support 54 62.4× 202
https://wassenaar.org/about
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
about 54 62.5× 202
https://wassenaar.org/products
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
product 54 62.2× 202
https://wassenaar.org/features
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
product 54 62.5× 202
https://wassenaar.org/solutions
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
product 54 62.2× 202
https://wassenaar.org/docs
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
docs 54 62.5× 202
https://wassenaar.org/blog
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
blog 54 62.3× 202
https://wassenaar.org/get-started
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
conversion 54 62.1× 202
https://wassenaar.org/demo
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
conversion 54 62.1× 202
https://wassenaar.org/case-studies
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
social-proof 54 61.8× 202
https://wassenaar.org/contact
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
support 54 62.3× 202
https://wassenaar.org/support
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
support 54 62.3× 202
https://wassenaar.org/faq
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
support 54 61.8× 202
https://wassenaar.org/integrations
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
integrations 54 61.8× 202
https://wassenaar.org/trust
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
trust 54 62.0× 202
https://wassenaar.org/security
Home - The Wassenaar Arrangement
trust 54 61.9× 202
Showing 20 of 23 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pricing/ 1 54 0% 62.4× High JS Bloat
/resources/ 1 54 0% 62.0× High JS Bloat
/demo/ 1 54 0% 62.1× High JS Bloat
/get-started/ 1 54 0% 62.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 54 0% 62.5× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 54 0% 62.5× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 54 0% 61.8× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 54 0% 62.3× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 54 0% 61.8× High JS Bloat
/trust/ 1 54 0% 62.0× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 54 0% 62.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 54 0% 62.5× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 1 54 0% 62.2× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 54 0% 62.3× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 54 0% 61.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 23 pages
at.linkedin.com ×23
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/wassenaar.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to wassenaar.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
wassenaar.org (this site) 59 81 WordPress 14.9× 1
aboutnurseassistantjobs.com 84 91 WordPress 5.5× 4 Compare →
dedikuoti.lt 84 92 WordPress 1.5× 4 Compare →
tissus-price.com 84 90 WordPress 2.7× 5 Compare →
aboutams.com 84 92 WordPress 4.2× 8 Compare →
goiasatacado.com.br 84 92 Custom / Proprietary 1.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite wassenaar.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

54
Homepage ACRI
54
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
40%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
54 40% about https://wassenaar.org/about
54 40% product https://wassenaar.org/products
54 40% product https://wassenaar.org/features
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

1 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

15
Total Links
1
Unique Domains
1.0
Avg/Page
7%
Diversity
at.linkedin.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 91.3

AI trust scores for the domains wassenaar.org links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to wassenaar.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Wassenaar",
  "url": "https://wassenaar.org",
  "logo": "https://www.wassenaar.org/wp/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 6% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Wassenaar?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Wassenaar does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Wassenaar work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Wassenaar."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for wassenaar.org:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history