visualwebsiteoptimizer.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 28 🏗️ Arch 85

visualwebsiteoptimizer.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

visualwebsiteoptimizer.com
📊

At 78/100, the ACRI for visualwebsiteoptimizer.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places visualwebsiteoptimizer.com above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 6.3× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (28) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 21 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than visualwebsiteoptimizer.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)28 × 0.20 = 5.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)85 × 0.15 = 12.8
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 30.8 + 5.6 + 12.8
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
41
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.2%
Rank #2452
+12 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

visualwebsiteoptimizer.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why visualwebsiteoptimizer.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat6.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

37 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

150 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 14
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://vwo.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — VWO | Digital Experience Optimization
  • ✓ og:description — VWO is the market-leading digital experience optimization solution that fast-growing companies use for experimentation & conversion rate optimization.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
visualwebsiteoptimizer.com
60
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 41/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 178 elements (170 lists, 3 rows, 5 headers)
Total Words3544
Raw Density5.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

64
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability64/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

15%
🗑️ 85%
Useful Content (145.4 KB)Bloat (769.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.3× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context72% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage239 / 332 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 84.1% · SNR: 0.19 · Signal: 37212 / Noise: 196865 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of visualwebsiteoptimizer.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
AI-first digital experience optimization for boosting conversions and enhancing user engagement
Target Audience
Marketers, product managers, CTOs, CMOs, digital experience teams
Pricing Model
Freemium, free trials, paid plans from $1,000/month
🔗 Integration Partners
HubSpotAcquiaAccenture
🏆 Competitive Moat
Pioneered AI-first user behavior analytics, first to use Visual Editor for DIY A/B Testing
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-27 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1161 ms
Raw HTML Size914.4 KB
Visible Text Size145.4 KB

Performance & Speed

28/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1161 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3524
DOM nodes
914 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, max-age=10
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

85/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://vwo.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

11
internal links
272
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 60/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for visualwebsiteoptimizer.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/visualwebsiteoptimizer.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=visualwebsiteoptimizer.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 12 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
60
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
63
Avg across 12 pages · Range 49–72
Topical Cohesion
19%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
46560
Avg Bloat
65.3×
RAG Fractures [?]
10
⚠️
10 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 10 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/careers
Careers | Wingify
pricing 72 19.3× 1654 💰 Pricing
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/pricing
Pricing & Plans | VWO Platform
pricing 67 24.3× 19862 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/terms
Terms & Conditions | VWO
pricing 67 23.8× 5361 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/about
About Us | VWO
pricing 64 71.5× 2023 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/features
VWO Platform | The Ultimate Customer Experience Optimization Product Suite
pricing 64 62.6× 2434 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/solutions
VWO | Digital Experience Optimization
pricing 64 86.0× 2178 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/blog
Blog On Best Practices & Insights in CRO, UX & CX | VWO
pricing 64 72.9× 1251 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/contact
Contact Us | VWO
pricing 64 145.9× 901 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/privacy
Privacy Policy | VWO
pricing 64 18.3× 7434 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/case-studies
Customer Success Stories & Case Studies | VWO
pricing 56 155.9× 1004 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/integrations
Integrations with Your Tools & Platforms
pricing 56 70.1× 2093 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/api
How to Access VWO API? – VWO
pricing 49 32.5× 365 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/privacy/ 1 64 0% 18.3× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 56 0% 70.1× High JS Bloat
/careers/ 1 72 0% 19.3× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 67 0% 24.3× High JS Bloat
/terms/ 1 67 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 64 0% 62.5× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 1 64 0% 86.0× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 71.5× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 72.9× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 64 0% 145.9× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 56 0% 155.9× High JS Bloat
/api/ 1 49 0% 32.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 12 pages
wingify.com ×12
vwo.com ×12
app.vwo.com ×11
help.vwo.com ×10
landingpageanalyzer.io ×10
pushcrew.com ×9
twitter.com ×3
g2.com ×3
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/visualwebsiteoptimizer.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
visualwebsiteoptimizer.com (this site) 60 78 WordPress 6.3× 2
ilfriuli.it 85 90 WordPress 3.4× 3 Compare →
direttagoal.it 85 90 WordPress 2.9× 1 Compare →
tokk-kansai.jp 85 90 WordPress 2.5× 1 Compare →
sbba.or.jp 85 90 WordPress 2.1× 1 Compare →
kingoftime.jp 85 91 WordPress 2.8× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 12 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

67
Homepage ACRI
62
Inner Avg ACRI
+5
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
33%
Inner Avg Ghost
15
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
64 40% pricing https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/about
64 40% pricing https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/features
64 40% pricing https://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/blog
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

B 70/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Named leadership: VWO, VWO
🔗

Citation Profile

25 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

92
Total Links
25
Unique Domains
7.7
Avg/Page
27%
Diversity
wingify.com vwo.com app.vwo.com landingpageanalyzer.io help.vwo.com pushcrew.com twitter.com linkedin.com g2.com facebook.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 32.3

AI trust scores for the domains visualwebsiteoptimizer.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Visualwebsiteoptimizer?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Visualwebsiteoptimizer does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Visualwebsiteoptimizer work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Visualwebsiteoptimizer."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for visualwebsiteoptimizer.com:

Current Score
78
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history