ubie.app 71 B
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 74 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 100

ubie.app — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

ubie.app
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for ubie.app is strong: an ACRI of 83/100 places it ahead of 97% of domains in the index. In the saas sector, ubie.app outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 6.0× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (46) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than ubie.app?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)74 × 0.40 = 29.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 29.6 + 14.8 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
71
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #69050
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 3%
Score 83/100

ubie.app has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why ubie.app ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrysaas
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat6.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

110 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

311 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://ubie.app
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 症状に関連する病名についてAIで無料で調べる
  • ✓ og:description — 現役医師たちが開発した無料で利用できる症状検索エンジンアプリ。スマホやパソコンでAIからの質問に答えるだけで、気になる症状に関連する病気や適切な医療機関を調べることができます。新型コロナウイルス感染症にも対応。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

74/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the saas sector, smahospital.jp (ACRI: 84) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
ubie.app
58
Your ACRI Score
84
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. smahospital.jp has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses Next.js. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 71/100 — Good
Structured Elements 35 elements (35 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words230
Raw Density15.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

74
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability74/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

16%
🗑️ 84%
Useful Content (9.2 KB)Bloat (46.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.0× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage8 / 8 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 83.4% · SNR: 0.20 · Signal: 2353 / Noise: 11801 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of ubie.app and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
AI-powered preliminary symptom assessment via tablet/smartphone, providing tailored follow-up questions for enhanced diagnosis.
Target Audience
Patients, medical professionals (doctors, hospital administrators)
Pricing Model
Free symptom search engine; AI consultation likely integrated within a paid service model (details not specified).
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-driven personalized questioning and symptom analysis compared to traditional questionnaires.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of explicit pricing information
• Limited details on AI consultation features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Serveristio-envoy
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time655 ms
Raw HTML Size55.3 KB
Visible Text Size9.2 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

655 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

393
DOM nodes
55 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://ubie.app/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

68
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 58/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for ubie.app
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/ubie.app" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=ubie.app" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 63 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
58
Single-page score
-41
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
17
Avg across 63 pages · Range 0–57
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 58, but internal pages average only 17 — a -41-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
32%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
3738
Avg Bloat
138.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/lp/feature/dementia
認知症の初期症状・予防・MCIなど徹底解説(医師監修)|ユビー病気のQ&A
product 57 139.2× 206
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/symptoms
ユビー病気のQ&A - 症状から探す | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 53 98.1× 626
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa
ユビー病気のQ&A - 病気の疑問や悩みに答えるQ&Aサイト | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
pricing 52 225.8× 528 💰 Pricing
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/user-questions
ユビー病気のQ&A - みんなのQ&A | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 49 145.6× 201
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/lp/feature/hay-fever
【2026年春】花粉症のおすすめ市販薬(医師・薬剤師監修)|ユビー病気のQ&A | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
product 48 477.8× 260
https://ubie.app/about-ai-monshin
ユビーAI問診とは | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
about 47 94.0× 62
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/lp/doctor-consulting
ユビーかんたん医師相談|ユビー病気のQ&A | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
docs 46 125.1× 264
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/supervisors
ユビー病気のQ&A - 監修医師一覧 | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 43 185.3× 314
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/lp/feature/acne
【2025年12月】ニキビのおすすめ市販薬(医師・薬剤師監修)|ユビー病気のQ&A | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
product 41 265.7× 180
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/story
ユビー病気のQ&Aの開発ストーリー | ユビー病気のQ&A | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 39 224.8× 79
https://ubie.app/about
症状検索エンジン「ユビー」とは | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
about 37 133.1× 18
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/feature
ユビー病気のQ&A - 特集から探す
product 36 203.4× 67
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/lp/hcp
医師・医療機関向け|ユビー病気のQ&A | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 36 347.6× 78
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/medicines
「あ」から始まるお薬|ユビー病気のQ&A | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 36 177.9× 118
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/content-guideline
ユビー病気のQ&A | コンテンツ制作・運営ポリシー | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
blog 36 164.6× 143
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/departments
ユビー病気のQ&A - 診療科から探す | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 36 192.9× 80
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/pr/ahp
原因不明で繰り返す激しい腹痛、もしかしてAHP?症状をチェック【医師監修】| ユビー病気のQ&A | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 36 134.3× 75
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/pr/rinderon/ad
手湿疹について / OTC医薬品「リンデロンVs」は、しっしんに使えますか? | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 36 158.4× 90
https://ubie.app/company
会社概要 | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
about 34 48.7× 31
https://ubie.app/byoki_qa/pr/rinderon/handeczema
OTC医薬品「リンデロンVs」は、しっしんに使えますか? | 症状検索エンジン「ユビー」
other 33 209.9× 63
Showing 20 of 63 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/byoki_qa/ 49 19 0% 114.5× High JS Bloat
/byoki_community/ 2 22 1% 1432.7× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/company/ 1 34 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about-ai-monshin/ 1 47 0% 94.0× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 37 0% 133.1× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/ubie.app

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar saas Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to ubie.app. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
ubie.app (this site) 58 83 Next.js 6.0× 2
bmbf.de 79 88 Next.js 5.1× 2 Compare →
haisha.kurumaerabi.com 78 89 Next.js 4.8× 3 Compare →
binder-connector.com 79 88 Next.js 3.1× 2 Compare →
trans-ntc.com 81 88 Next.js 8.1× 2 Compare →
golmicio.asahi.co.jp 79 88 Next.js 2.7× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite ubie.app when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to ubie.app. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Ubie",
  "url": "https://ubie.app",
  "logo": "https://ubie.app/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Ubie",
  "url": "https://ubie.app",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://ubie.app/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Ubie?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Ubie does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Ubie work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Ubie."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for ubie.app:

Current Score
83
Projected Score
99
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →