u-komi.com 57 D
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 66
Radar → Domains → u-komi.com

u-komi.com — Global SEODiff Score 57/100

u-komi.com
📊

u-komi.com has earned a 91/100 ACRI — a tier-1 result that puts it ahead of 99% of sites in the SEODiff Radar. Compared to other saas sites (avg score: 58), u-komi.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 21.2× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. With 4 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

57
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (47) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (21×) → +5–10 pts
50
🛡️ Traditional SEO
62
🤖 AI Readiness
47
⚡ Performance
66
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than u-komi.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)66 × 0.15 = 9.9
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 24.8 + 9.4 + 9.9
Global SEODiff Score = 57 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
79
Structure
avg 36
88
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 9%
Rank #90693
-8 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 91/100

u-komi.com is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why u-komi.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrysaas
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat21.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other Next.js sites → saas industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

113 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

187 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://u-komi.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — UGCツール・レビュー管理ならU-KOMI｜EC売上を最大化する国産UGC活用プラットフォーム
  • ✓ og:description — U-KOMIは導入企業1500社突破のUGCツール。レビュー収集・Instagram UGC活用・AIレビュー分析で ECサイトのCVR向上を実現。無料資料請求はこちら。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the saas sector, gp-auto.com.ua (ACRI: 84) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
u-komi.com
64
Your ACRI Score
→
gp-auto.com.ua
84
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. gp-auto.com.ua has schema coverage of 2 blocks and uses Cloudflare Pages. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 79/100 — Good
Structured Elements 51 elements (51 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words273
Raw Density18.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (9.9 KB)Bloat (200.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio21.2× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage187 / 187 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 209.9 KB, but only 9.9 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (21.2×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.3% · SNR: 0.05 · Signal: 2540 / Noise: 51194 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servernginx
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time1704 ms
Raw HTML Size209.9 KB
Visible Text Size9.9 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1704 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

985
DOM nodes
210 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → s-maxage=31536000
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

66/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

45
internal links
32
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 64/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for u-komi.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/u-komi.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=u-komi.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 40 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
64
Single-page score
-15
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 40 pages · Range 36–55
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 64, but internal pages average only 50 — a -15-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
2527
Avg Bloat
144.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://u-komi.com/agreement
利用規約 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 55 35.6× 198 ✓
https://u-komi.com/about
私たちについて | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 about 52 141.2× 56 ✓
https://u-komi.com/compliance
コンプライアンス | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 trust 52 73.4× 69 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei16
U-KOMI導入でレビュー獲得数が急増！LINE経由でのレビュー獲得にも手応え | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 148.8× 58 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei06
レビューの充実度が購入の決め手に。U-KOMI導入でお客様とのコミュニケーションも活性化 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 143.1× 64 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei
事例一覧 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 166.5× 157 ✓
https://u-komi.com/document
資料請求 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 docs 52 127.9× 53 ✓
https://u-komi.com/policy
信頼性ポリシー | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 47.3× 116 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei01
U-KOMI導入により口コミを自動で集計、お客様の声をダイレクトに反映できるように！ | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 136.1× 63 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei03
自社ECでのレビュー獲得で信頼性アップ！口コミを反映した商品開発も | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 149.1× 64 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei05
U-KOMIで口コミを公表し、さらなる安心感と信頼感を醸成できるように | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 144.1× 58 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei13
寄せられたレビューを広告の訴求内容の参考に。商品の改良でCVR・継続率も上昇 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 138.2× 66 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei07
U-KOMI導入によりCV率に好影響が。すぐれたUIとインタラクティブ性にも期待 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 159.9× 51 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei08
U-KOMI導入で口コミが増加。製品開発や社内のモチベーションアップにも貢献 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 139.7× 63 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei09
レビュー数や評価に応じたCVRの増減を分析。ネガティブレビューを生かした商品改善にも取り組む | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 151.6× 59 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei10
レビューを参考にした問い合わせが急増。今ではU-KOMIがなくてはならない存在に | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 152.3× 55 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei11
ECをきっかけにオフラインでの客数も増加。スタッフのモチベーション向上につながる効果も | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 142.3× 58 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei14
レビュー依頼のコスト削減とレビュー数の大幅増を実現。サイトの改善にも活用 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 134.6× 62 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei15
レビューがサプリメントの効果・特徴を知るきっかけに！レビューを見たお客様からの問い合わせも増加 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 148.0× 56 ✓
https://u-komi.com/jirei/jirei17
U-KOMI導入によりレビューが集まらない課題を解消。集客数も大幅に増加 | U-KOMI（ユーコミ）
 other 52 138.7× 61 ✓
Showing 20 of 40 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/jirei/ 30 51 0% 148.9× High JS Bloat
/document/ 2 46 0% 189.9× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 2 38 0% 185.2× Bot Blocked
/compliance/ 1 52 0% 73.4× High JS Bloat
/policy/ 1 52 0% 47.3× High JS Bloat
/tokushokappan/ 1 42 0% 112.0× High JS Bloat
/company/ 1 39 0% 140.9× High JS Bloat
/agreement/ 1 55 0% 35.6× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 52 0% 141.2× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 40 pages
status.u-komi.com ×40
support.u-komi.com ×40
blog.u-komi.com ×40
xexymix.jp ×1
tango-jersey.co.jp ×1
mhlw.go.jp ×1
buson-an.co.jp ×1
kurashikisilk.jp ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/u-komi.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar saas Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to u-komi.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
u-komi.com (this site) 64 91 Next.js 21.2× 4 —
trans-ntc.com 81 88 Next.js 8.1× 2 Compare →
haisha.kurumaerabi.com 78 89 Next.js 4.8× 3 Compare →
bmbf.de 79 88 Next.js 5.1× 2 Compare →
binder-connector.com 79 88 Next.js 3.1× 2 Compare →
golmicio.asahi.co.jp 79 88 Next.js 2.7× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite u-komi.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to u-komi.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html 
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for u-komi.com:

Current Score
91
Projected Score
96
Improvement
+5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.