targetads.io 42 D
🛡️ SEO 29 🤖 GEO 50 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 50

targetads.io — Global SEODiff Score 42/100

targetads.io
📊

The AI-Readiness score for targetads.io is 59/100 — a middling result that leaves significant room to climb the Radar rankings. In the infrastructure sector, targetads.io outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

42
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (29) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (74×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than targetads.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)29 × 0.25 = 7.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)50 × 0.40 = 20.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)50 × 0.15 = 7.5
Weighted sum = 7.2 + 20.0 + 6.8 + 7.5
Global SEODiff Score = 42 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.8%
Rank #8017
+55 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 55%
Score 59/100

targetads.io punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why targetads.io ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

29/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

64 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

294 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://targetads.io
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — TargetADS — система медийной аналитики
  • ✓ og:description — Наша система поможет прозрачно доказать эффективность вложений в медийную рекламу или поможет эффективно перераспределить бюджет, вплоть до каждого креатива.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

50/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
targetads.io
31
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1324
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

26
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability26/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (95/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (30.9 KB)Bloat (2243.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context0% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage0 / 60 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 2274.7 KB, but only 30.9 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 0% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.6% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 7899 / Noise: 574426 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serverddos-guard
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1790 ms
Raw HTML Size2274.7 KB
Visible Text Size30.9 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1790 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2841
DOM nodes
2275 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

50/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://targetads.io/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

10
internal links
2
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 31/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for targetads.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/targetads.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=targetads.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 45 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
31
Single-page score
+31
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
62
Avg across 45 pages · Range 36–90
Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
33974
Avg Bloat
38.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://targetads.io/help/ecom_report
Отчет по электронной коммерции
support 90 9.4× 1285
https://targetads.io/help/verification_report
Верификация медиа
support 90 5.6× 3748
https://targetads.io/help/attribution_models
Модели атрибуции
support 90 5.6× 3840
https://targetads.io/help/event_calltouch
Импорт целевых событий из CallTouch
pricing 85 6.8× 1128 💰 Pricing
https://targetads.io/help/tracking
Трекинг
support 77 7.0× 884
https://targetads.io/help/custom_reporting
Кастомная отчетность
support 77 7.3× 3142
https://targetads.io/policy
Политика в отношении обработки персональных данных
other 77 6.9× 1487
https://targetads.io/help/event_adjust
Получение мобильных событий из Adjust
support 70 18.3× 258
https://targetads.io/help/alert
Алертинг
support 70 10.4× 487
https://targetads.io/help/api
TargetADS API's
docs 67 13.7× 606
https://targetads.io/help/api/agg_media
Aggregated data API
docs 67 15.8× 1168
https://targetads.io/help/api/fraud
GIVT Fraud API
docs 67 15.5× 609
https://targetads.io/help/event_offline
Загрузка офлайн событий в систему
support 67 11.5× 791
https://targetads.io/help/event_eccomerce
Настройка целевых событий для e-commerce в TargetADS
support 67 9.3× 490
https://targetads.io/help/tracking/source
Настройки источника в сервисе TargetADS
support 67 16.3× 597
https://targetads.io/help/access
Управление доступом TargetADS
support 67 18.2× 791
https://targetads.io/help/uploading_campaigns
Создание кампаний через загрузочный файл
support 67 17.2× 603
https://targetads.io/help/download_pixel
Скачивание пикселей в Target Ads
support 67 11.3× 548
https://targetads.io/help/media_report
Отчет по медийным кампаниям
support 67 10.1× 2412
https://targetads.io/help/path_to_conversion_api
Path to conversion
support 67 14.7× 772
Showing 20 of 45 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/help/ 37 65 0% 27.8× High JS Bloat
/tracking/ 2 44 0% 32.5× High JS Bloat
/222222/ 1 46 0% 257.3× High JS Bloat
/11111/ 1 36 0% 339.1× High JS Bloat
/policy/ 1 77 0% 6.9× High JS Bloat
/essential_params/ 1 57 0% 14.4× High JS Bloat
/approval/ 1 57 0% 13.6× High JS Bloat
/mobile/ 1 47 0% 14.1× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/targetads.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to targetads.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
targetads.io (this site) 31 59 Custom / Proprietary 73.7× 0
learning.americangeosciences.org 56 74 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 0 Compare →
orel-ds34.obr57.ru 56 72 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 0 Compare →
tvtech.cctv.cn 56 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 0 Compare →
flexpowermodules.com 56 70 Custom / Proprietary 3.7× 0 Compare →
ctt.pbs.edu.pl 56 74 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to targetads.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Targetads",
  "url": "https://targetads.io",
  "logo": "https://static.tildacdn.com/tild6130-3232-4038-a237-653633373639/TargetAds_Favicon_Li.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Targetads",
  "url": "https://targetads.io",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://targetads.io/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Targetads?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Targetads does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Targetads work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Targetads."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for targetads.io:

Current Score
59
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history