solidbroker.ru 50 D
🛡️ SEO 20 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 29 🏗️ Arch 96

solidbroker.ru — Global SEODiff Score 50/100

solidbroker.ru
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for solidbroker.ru is strong: an ACRI of 73/100 places it ahead of 75% of domains in the index. In the developer sector, solidbroker.ru outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

50
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (20) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (60×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 24 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than solidbroker.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)20 × 0.25 = 5.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)29 × 0.20 = 5.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)96 × 0.15 = 14.4
Weighted sum = 5.0 + 24.8 + 5.8 + 14.4
Global SEODiff Score = 50 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
51
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
80
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.4%
Rank #4437
+25 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 25%
Score 73/100

solidbroker.ru punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why solidbroker.ru ranks here

Tech stackNuxt.js
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

20/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

21 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

314 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://solidbroker.ru/index
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
solidbroker.ru
51
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 51/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 85 elements (85 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1079
Raw Density7.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

42
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability42/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (95/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (15.7 KB)Bloat (927.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context77% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage10 / 13 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 943.1 KB, but only 15.7 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.3% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 4018 / Noise: 237411 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of solidbroker.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The company, IFK "Solid", is a financial investment firm providing a wide range of investment services including brokerage accounts, investment
Target Audience
Individual investors, corporate clients, brokerage clients, trustees, investment consultants, and corporate investors.
Pricing Model
Variable, based on services utilized. Offers various accounts and fees for brokerage, trust management, and investment consulting.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive range of financial services and a broad network of international banking partners for currency exchange and securities trading.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of clear pricing information beyond general service descriptions
• Complex terminology and legal documents presented without sufficient explanation
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNuxt.js
AI-Readiness Score80/100
Serverddos-guard
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2163 ms
Raw HTML Size943.1 KB
Visible Text Size15.7 KB

Performance & Speed

29/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2163 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1308
DOM nodes
943 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

96/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://solidbroker.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

118
internal links
22
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 51/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for solidbroker.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/solidbroker.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=solidbroker.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 272 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
51
Single-page score
-8
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
43
Avg across 272 pages · Range 43–53
Total Words
96663
Avg Bloat
190.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/requisites
Реквизиты для клиентов ИФК «Солид»
pricing 53 230.2× 829 💰 Pricing
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/tarify_ao_ifk_-solid
Тарифы АО ИФК «Солид»
docs 43 605.7× 307
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/promotion
Акции
docs 43 611.7× 304
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/dopolnitelnaya_informatsiya
Дополнительная информация
docs 43 609.7× 305
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/soglashenie_ob_ispolzovanii_elektronnoy_podpisi
Соглашение об использовании электронной подписи
docs 43 603.9× 308
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/reglament_osushchestvlenie_deyatelnosti_po_upravleniyu_tsennymi_bumagami
Регламент осуществления деятельности по управлению ценными бумагами
docs 43 600.0× 310
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/ankety
Анкеты
docs 43 611.7× 304
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/usloviya_osushchestvleniya_depozitarnoy_deyatelnosti
Условия осуществления депозитарной деятельности
docs 43 605.9× 307
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/manuals
Инструкции
docs 43 611.6× 304
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/svidetelstvo_fssp
Свидетельство ФССП
docs 43 609.7× 305
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/regulations_for_securities_market
Регламент оказания услуг на финансовых рынках
docs 43 601.9× 309
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/fatca
FATCA/CRS
docs 43 611.7× 304
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/requisites_for_contractors
Реквизиты для подрядчиков ИФК «Солид»
pricing 43 452.4× 413 💰 Pricing
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/perechen_dokumentov-_predostavlyaemykh_v_ao_ifk_-solid-_dlya_polucheniya_uslug_na_finansovykh_rynkakh
Перечень документов, предоставляемых в АО ИФК «Солид» для получения услуг на финансовых рынках
docs 43 588.7× 316
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/informatsionnye_dokumenty_o_finansovykh_instrumentakh
Информационные документы о финансовых инструментах
docs 43 603.9× 308
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/investment_consulting
Инвестиционное консультирование
docs 43 609.8× 305
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/reglament_priznaniya_litsa_kvalifitsirovannym_investorom
Регламент признания лица квалифицированным инвестором
docs 43 603.9× 308
https://solidbroker.ru/docs/personalnye_dannye
Персональные данные
docs 43 609.7× 305
https://solidbroker.ru/blog/news/5000084
С 1 по 14 февраля 2005 года будет производиться прием заявок на приобретение и погашение инвестиционных паев Интервального паевого инвестиционного фонда смешанных инвестиций 'Солид Интервальный'.
blog 43 152.8× 377
https://solidbroker.ru/blog/news/5000083
Казанское представительство ИФК 'Солид' приглашает Вас посетить 03-04 февраля 2005г. семинар 'Учись работать на фондовом рынке'.
blog 43 159.9× 359
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 254 43 1% 162.7× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 18 44 1% 576.8× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 272 pages
vk.com ×272
rutube.ru ×272
appgallery.huawei.com ×272
client.solidbroker.ru ×272
apps.apple.com ×272
oneclick.solidbroker.ru ×272
t.me ×272
365mg.ru ×254
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/solidbroker.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to solidbroker.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
solidbroker.ru (this site) 51 73 Nuxt.js 60.1× 0
stove-parts-unlimited.com 76 80 Express 2.9× 0 Compare →
cloudify.co 76 84 Hugo 3.4× 0 Compare →
clevelandgolf.com 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0 Compare →
devdocs.prestashop-project.org 76 80 Express 2.9× 0 Compare →
pulpproject.org 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

43
Homepage ACRI
43
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
60%
Homepage Ghost
60%
Inner Avg Ghost
4
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
43 60% docs https://solidbroker.ru/docs/fatca
43 60% docs https://solidbroker.ru/docs/usloviya_osushchestvleniya_depozitarnoy_deyatelnosti
43 60% docs https://solidbroker.ru/docs/personalnye_dannye
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

F 0/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

7 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

105
Total Links
7
Unique Domains
7.0
Avg/Page
7%
Diversity
appgallery.huawei.com t.me rutube.ru vk.com oneclick.solidbroker.ru client.solidbroker.ru apps.apple.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 29.0

AI trust scores for the domains solidbroker.ru links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to solidbroker.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Solidbroker",
  "url": "https://solidbroker.ru",
  "logo": "https://solidbroker.ru/icons/favicon.svg",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Solidbroker",
  "url": "https://solidbroker.ru",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://solidbroker.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Solidbroker?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Solidbroker does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Solidbroker work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Solidbroker."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for solidbroker.ru:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
91
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history