shahid.net 15 F
🛡️ SEO 0 🤖 GEO 34 ⚡ Perf 38 🏗️ Arch 60
Radar → Domains → shahid.net

shahid.net — Global SEODiff Score 15/100

shahid.net
📊

With only 15/100 on the AI-Readiness Index, shahid.net is at severe risk of being overlooked by AI-powered search and answer engines. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places shahid.net below the industry average of 58 —, indicating room for competitive improvement. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Structured data coverage is solid at 3 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. A full AI bot restriction means AI-powered search and answer engines cannot currently crawl and index this domain's content.

15
F — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Significant improvement opportunities. Start with Traditional SEO (0).
🎯 Top Fix: Allow GPTBot + ClaudeBot in robots.txt → lift the score cap
0
🛡️ Traditional SEO
34
🤖 AI Readiness
38
⚡ Performance
60
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than shahid.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)0 × 0.25 = 0.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)34 × 0.40 = 13.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)38 × 0.20 = 7.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)60 × 0.15 = 9.0
Weighted sum = 0.0 + 13.6 + 7.6 + 9.0
⚠️ Fatal multiplier: All major AI bots blocked → ×0.5
Global SEODiff Score = 15 (F)
🚫
Gatekeeper Rule: Score cannot exceed 15. Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot are blocked in robots.txt. No major AI assistant can cite this site. Allow at least one major AI crawler to lift the cap. See Bot Access →
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
0
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
18
Structure
avg 36
46
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #30801
+64 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 67%
Score 15/100

shahid.net punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why shahid.net ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industryinfrastructure
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other Next.js sites → infrastructure industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

0/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

31 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

68 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://shahid.mbc.net/ar
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ar
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✗ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — MBC شاهد | الرئيسية
  • ✓ og:description — شاهد مسلسلات خليجية،دوري روشن مباشرة
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

34/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
shahid.net
33
Your ACRI Score
→
safely.co.jp
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

❌
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
❌
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
❌
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
❌
Google-Extended
Blocked
❌
Googlebot
Blocked
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 18/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 7 elements (7 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words686
Raw Density1.0%
💡Low structure score (18/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 7 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

43
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
Critical
Blocklist Risk
Extractability43/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskCritical — 5 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (7.3 KB)Bloat (581.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context81% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage25 / 31 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 588.7 KB, but only 7.3 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.8% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 1857 / Noise: 148859 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server—
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time2221 ms
Raw HTML Size588.7 KB
Visible Text Size7.3 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

38/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2221 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

717
DOM nodes
589 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=900, stale-while-revalidate=2592000, stale-if-error=600
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

15
tracker scripts
6
third-party domains
37.4%
token overhead
Heavy tracker burden — scripts may dilute useful content for AI
clarity.mstiktok.com/i18n/pixelgoogletagmanager.comfacebook.netstatic.ads-twitter.comdoubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

60/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✗ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

20
internal links
11
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ar
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 33/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for shahid.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/shahid.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=shahid.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to shahid.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
shahid.net (this site) 33 15 Next.js 81.2× 3 —
resources.breakoutedu.com 58 88 Squarespace 10.8× 3 Compare →
ungtycomicsi.com 58 72 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 2 Compare →
em2go.de 58 85 Shopify 31.4× 2 Compare →
vulkanvegas.pro 58 70 WordPress 2.3× 2 Compare →
breathemagazine.com.au 58 80 WordPress 23.6× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite shahid.net when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to shahid.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text 
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is restricted — Claude may not be able to cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text 
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html 
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html 
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Shahid?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Shahid does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Shahid work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Shahid."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for shahid.net:

Current Score
15
Projected Score
36
Improvement
+21 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.