seo.com 69 C
🛡️ SEO 84 🤖 GEO 68 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 78

seo.com — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

seo.com
📊

seo.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 80/100, outperforming 94% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, seo.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 21.4× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (21×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 6, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than seo.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)84 × 0.25 = 21.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)68 × 0.40 = 27.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 21.0 + 27.2 + 9.4 + 11.7
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
49
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #54218
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

seo.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why seo.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat21.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

84/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

59 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

152 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.seo.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — SEO.com - The Authority for All Things SEO
  • ✓ og:description — Everything you need to rank your website better. Services, tools, and resources to get you higher in the search results.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

68/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
seo.com
63
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 49/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 188 elements (188 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2582
Raw Density7.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (45.4 KB)Bloat (927.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio21.4× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context72% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage41 / 57 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 972.5 KB, but only 45.4 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (21.4×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.3% · SNR: 0.05 · Signal: 11634 / Noise: 237323 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of seo.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
SEO.com is a comprehensive digital marketing resource and platform, providing expertise and solutions to businesses seeking to improve their online presence and rankings.
Target Audience
Business owners, marketing managers, SEO specialists, and website developers seeking digital marketing support.
Pricing Model
Not explicitly stated, likely tiered or custom-based, with a focus on providing value through expertise and a full-service approach.
🔗 Integration Partners
RevenueCloudFX
🏆 Competitive Moat
A team of over 500 digital experts with 27+ years of experience, combined with proprietary technology and data-driven strategies.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
RevenueCloudFX
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of transparency (addressed with ‘transparency’ as a value proposition)
• Limited information on pricing
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time969 ms
Raw HTML Size972.5 KB
Visible Text Size45.4 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

969 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1512
DOM nodes
972 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, s-maxage=3600
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.seo.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

156
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 63/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for seo.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/seo.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=seo.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 62 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
63
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 62 pages · Range 54–69
Topical Cohesion
12%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
100031
Avg Bloat
103.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.seo.com/blog/hire-seo/
How to Find and Hire an SEO Expert in 5 Steps
pricing 69 111.2× 1236 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/audience-research-tools/
7 Best Target Audience Tools for Finding Your Market 2026
pricing 69 77.8× 1983 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/how-to-find-long-tail-keywords/
How to Find Long-Tail Keywords Like a Pro
pricing 69 108.6× 1260 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/what-is-first-link-priority/
What Is First Link Priority and Does It Affect Rankings?
pricing 69 120.7× 1127 💰 Pricing
https://seo.com/features
Free SEO Tools by SEO.com | Online SEO Tools to Boost Rankings
pricing 69 100.8× 1454 💰 Pricing
https://seo.com/pricing
How Much Does SEO Cost? Buyers, Sellers, & In-House Guide
pricing 64 57.2× 2566 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/seo-help/
SEO Help: Learn How to Improve Your SEO Efforts - SEO.com
pricing 64 98.8× 1418 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/seo-tips/
6 Most Effective SEO Tips for Growing Your Rankings
pricing 64 104.1× 1322 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/when-can-i-stop-seo/
When Can I Stop SEO? (And What Happens When I Do?) - SEO.com
pricing 64 115.6× 1187 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/ubersuggest-alternatives/
12 Ubersuggest Alternatives To Consider for 2026
pricing 64 64.1× 2165 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/semrush-alternatives/
10 Semrush Alternatives You Can Try for Your SEO Strategy
pricing 64 57.7× 2410 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/on-page-vs-off-page-seo/
On-Page vs. Off-Page SEO: Key Differences
pricing 64 94.2× 1485 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/semrush-vs-spyfu/
Semrush vs. SpyFu: Which Is Better for SEO in 2026?
pricing 64 72.4× 2033 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/seo-over-optimization/
How to Avoid (And Spot) Over-Optimization in SEO - SEO.com
pricing 64 117.8× 1199 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/seo-benefits/
15 Best SEO Benefits for Businesses & Webmasters in 2026
pricing 64 71.1× 1933 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/how-long-should-a-blog-post-be/
How Long Should a Blog Post Be? Best Blog Length for 2026
pricing 64 62.8× 2366 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/semrush-pricing/
Semrush Pricing: How Much Does Semrush Cost?
pricing 64 89.1× 1596 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/semrush-vs-similarweb/
Semrush vs. Similarweb: Which Tool Is Better?
pricing 64 80.6× 1826 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/best-digital-marketing-tools/
11 Best Digital Marketing Tools for 2026
pricing 64 97.5× 1463 💰 Pricing
https://www.seo.com/blog/ubersuggest-vs-ahrefs/
Ubersuggest vs. Ahrefs: Pros and Cons of These SEO Tools
pricing 64 54.8× 2923 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 62 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 56 64 0% 93.4× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 69 0% 100.8× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 57.2× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 216.8× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 64 0% 191.6× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 64 0% 52.5× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 54 0% 539.2× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 62 pages
webfx.com ×62
teamai.com ×62
nutshell.com ×62
omniseo.com ×62
semrush.com ×9
ahrefs.com ×8
developers.google.com ×6
pagespeed.web.dev ×4
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/seo.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to seo.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
seo.com (this site) 63 80 WordPress 21.4× 1
grupocasalima.com 87 96 WordPress 11.4× 5 Compare →
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.7× 2 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 89 WordPress 3.0× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite seo.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to seo.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Seo?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Seo does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Seo work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Seo."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for seo.com:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history