semena.ru 64 C
🛡️ SEO 39 🤖 GEO 86 ⚡ Perf 33 🏗️ Arch 88

semena.ru — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

semena.ru
📊

With a solid 84/100 ACRI, semena.ru is well-positioned for AI search — better than 98% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), semena.ru performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 15% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. Token bloat registers at 9.7× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (33) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 8 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than semena.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)39 × 0.25 = 9.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)86 × 0.40 = 34.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)33 × 0.20 = 6.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)88 × 0.15 = 13.2
Weighted sum = 9.8 + 34.4 + 6.6 + 13.2
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
94
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 40%
Rank #396209
-37 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

semena.ru ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 40%) than in AI search (Top 2%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why semena.ru ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat9.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

39/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

206 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

364 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://semena.ru/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Купить семена, саженцы, луковицы цветов в питомнике интернет-магазине Semena.ru. Более 10 000 товаров для сада и огорода
  • ✓ og:description — Крупнейший интернет-магазин семян и питомник саженцев Семена.ру. Огромный выбор семян, растений, луковиц цветов и посадочного материала. Быстрая и бережная доставка почтой и курьером по всей России!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

86/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
semena.ru
71
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 94/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 597 elements (597 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2249
Raw Density26.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

73
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability73/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

10%
🗑️ 90%
Useful Content (44.3 KB)Bloat (385.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio9.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context68% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage36 / 53 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 89.7% · SNR: 0.11 · Signal: 11332 / Noise: 98672 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of semena.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Semenа.ru is an online marketplace specializing in seeds and planting material, offering a wide selection of vegetable, flower, and fruit
Target Audience
Hobby gardeners, professional growers, and individuals seeking high-quality seeds and planting material.
Pricing Model
Variable, based on product selection and shipping costs. Offers discounts and promotional codes.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive product selection, reliable logistics, and personalized customer service, combined with a focus on quality and expert advice.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-18

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serverddos-guard
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1819 ms
Raw HTML Size429.7 KB
Visible Text Size44.3 KB

Performance & Speed

33/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1819 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4047
DOM nodes
430 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

88/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://semena.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

715
internal links
28
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 71/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for semena.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/semena.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=semena.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
71
Single-page score
-56
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
15
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–75
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 71, but internal pages average only 15 — a -56-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
1862
Avg Bloat
10.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://semena.ru/about
О нас - интернет-магазин Semena.ru
about 75 60.5× 732
https://semena.ru/faq
Вопрос-ответ по оформлению заказов в интернет-магазине Semena.ru
support 75 39.1× 1130
https://semena.ru/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://semena.ru/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://semena.ru/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://semena.ru/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://semena.ru/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://semena.ru/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://semena.ru/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://semena.ru/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 75 0% 39.1× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 75 0% 60.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
ok.ru ×2
play.google.com ×2
t.me ×2
youtube.com ×2
reviews.yandex.ru ×2
apps.apple.com ×2
vk.ru ×2
wa.me ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/semena.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to semena.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
semena.ru (this site) 71 84 Custom / Proprietary 9.7× 2
melbourneschool.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 4 Compare →
violinsetc.com 89 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 1 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
safescan.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 5 Compare →
kobekyo.com 90 94 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite semena.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to semena.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Semena",
  "url": "https://semena.ru",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://semena.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Semena?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Semena does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Semena work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Semena."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for semena.ru:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
94
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history