rollingstone.com.br 71 B
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 49 🏗️ Arch 76

rollingstone.com.br — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

rollingstone.com.br
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for rollingstone.com.br is strong: an ACRI of 78/100 places it ahead of 88% of domains in the index. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), rollingstone.com.br performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 4.5× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (49) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than rollingstone.com.br?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)49 × 0.20 = 9.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 32.8 + 9.8 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
40
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #64288
+6 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

rollingstone.com.br shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why rollingstone.com.br ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat4.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

20 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

180 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 48
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://rollingstone.com.br/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Rolling Stone Brasil
  • ✓ og:description — Rolling Stone Brasil: música, cultura pop, cinema, entretenimento e entrevistas exclusivas. As últimas notícias, críticas e tendências que marcam o mundo da arte e da cultura.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
rollingstone.com.br
62
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 40/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 45 elements (45 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words955
Raw Density4.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

68
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability68/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

22%
🗑️ 78%
Useful Content (20.0 KB)Bloat (69.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context81% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage42 / 52 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

12 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 77.6% · SNR: 0.29 · Signal: 5126 / Noise: 17805 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of rollingstone.com.br and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform helps distributed teams streamline project management through AI-powered sprint planning and real-time resource optimization, boosting productivity and reducing wasted time.
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, agile coaches, and project leaders in tech companies.
Pricing Model
Tiered subscription model: Free plan with limited features, then paid plans starting at $12/user/month, with increasing functionality and user limits.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-driven sprint planning and resource allocation, providing a significant advantage over traditional project management tools.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time5795 ms
Raw HTML Size89.6 KB
Visible Text Size20.0 KB

Performance & Speed

49/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

5795 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

646
DOM nodes
90 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=60
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://rollingstone.com.br/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

108
internal links
47
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 62/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for rollingstone.com.br
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/rollingstone.com.br" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=rollingstone.com.br" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 58 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
62
Single-page score
+6
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
68
Avg across 58 pages · Range 44–90
Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
38908
Avg Bloat
21.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/30-anos-sem-elvis/
30 anos sem Elvis - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 90 4.4× 3367
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/quem-sumiu-pelas-maos-do-exercito/
Quem Sumiu pelas Mãos do Exército - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 85 7.9× 1627
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/a-insustensavel-nerdeza-do-ser/
A insustensável nerdeza do ser - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 14.9× 739
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/muito-barulho-por-tudo/
Muito barulho por tudo - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 12.0× 944
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/o-ataque-das-flanelas/
O ataque das flanelas - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 14.5× 770
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/crise-liberta-oscar-da-chatice/
Crise liberta Oscar da chatice - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 13.9× 809
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/doc-dos-titas-resgata-espirito-jovem/
Doc dos Titãs resgata espírito jovem - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 14.7× 758
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/madonna-versus-lady-gaga/
Madonna versus Lady Gaga - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 17.6× 613
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/vai-um-sanguinho-ai/
Vai um sanguinho aí? - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 14.3× 772
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/kurt-cobain-e-o-vexame-em-iguitar-hero-5-i/
Kurt Cobain e o vexame em Guitar Hero 5 - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 17.3× 628
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/a-volta-do-little-quail-and-the-mad-birds/
A volta do Little Quail and the Mad Birds - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 11.1× 1042
https://rollingstone.com.br/blog/a-arte-de-enxugar-gelo/
A arte de enxugar gelo - Rolling Stone Brasil
blog 75 16.6× 642
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/nova-inspiracao/
Nova Inspiração - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 75 15.4× 772
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/onde-esta-o-dinheiro/
Onde Está o Dinheiro - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 75 14.2× 842
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/homens-de-fibra/
Homens de Fibra - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 75 13.4× 894
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/wilco/
Wilco - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 75 18.0× 616
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/faroeste-urbano/
Faroeste Urbano - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 75 12.3× 951
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/vigorosos-15-anos/
Vigorosos 15 Anos - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 75 18.1× 620
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/duran-duran-40/
Duran Duran - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 75 19.0× 589
https://rollingstone.com.br/artigo/concorrencia-saudavel/
Concorrência Saudável - Rolling Stone Brasil
other 75 15.3× 777
Showing 20 of 58 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 36 66 0% 20.3× High JS Bloat
/artigo/ 20 75 0% 15.6× High JS Bloat
/guia-dvd/ 1 57 0% 22.4× High JS Bloat
/ultimas-noticias/ 1 44 0% 151.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 58 pages
perfil.com ×58
sportbuzz.com.br ×58
instagram.com ×58
manequim.com.br ×58
canalnet.tv ×58
exitoina.perfil.com ×58
vivasaudedigital.com.br ×58
contigo.com.br ×58
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/rollingstone.com.br

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to rollingstone.com.br. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
rollingstone.com.br (this site) 62 78 WordPress 4.5× 1
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.7× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 89 WordPress 3.0× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite rollingstone.com.br when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to rollingstone.com.br. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Com?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Com does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Com work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Com."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for rollingstone.com.br:

Current Score
78
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history