public.law 68 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 63 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 93

public.law — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

public.law
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for public.law is strong: an ACRI of 71/100 places it ahead of 70% of domains in the index. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places public.law above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. Heavy markup overhead (17.1× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (62) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than public.law?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)63 × 0.40 = 25.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 25.2 + 12.4 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
43
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #50451
+25 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

public.law punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why public.law ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat17.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

30 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

66 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.public.law/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Public.Law: Online law library
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

63/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
public.law
49
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 17.1x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 43/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 28 elements (12 lists, 8 rows, 8 headers)
Total Words516
Raw Density5.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

51
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability51/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

5%
🗑️ 95%
Useful Content (4.8 KB)Bloat (78.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio17.1× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage5 / 5 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 94.2% · SNR: 0.06 · Signal: 1238 / Noise: 19975 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1147 ms
Raw HTML Size82.9 KB
Visible Text Size4.8 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1147 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

269
DOM nodes
83 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=3600, public, s-maxage=3600, stale-while-revalidate=3600, stale-if-error=3600
  • ✓ CDN cache status → BYPASS
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.public.law/sitemaps/sitemap.xml.gz
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

26
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 49/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for public.law
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/public.law" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=public.law" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 69 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
49
Single-page score
+7
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
56
Avg across 69 pages · Range 32–85
Topical Cohesion
17%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
12814
Avg Bloat
17.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.public.law/sources/medical-news-today/items/hiv-confidentiality-laws-by-state-what-to-know
Bibliographic info: “HIV confidentiality laws by state: What to know”
other 85 7.2× 618
https://www.public.law/sources/cdc/items/state-laws-that-address-high-impact-hiv-prevention-efforts
Bibliographic info: “State Laws that address High-Impact HIV Prevention Efforts”
other 85 7.4× 594
https://www.public.law/sources
Secondary Sources
pricing 75 10.6× 1172 💰 Pricing
https://www.public.law/sources/jd-supra/items/justice-platkin-s-primer-on-shareholders-inspection-rights
Bibliographic info: “Justice Platkin’s Primer on Shareholders’ Inspection Rights”
other 65 12.6× 220
https://www.public.law/sources/doorloop/items/breaking-a-lease-in-new-york-tenant-property-manager-rights
Bibliographic info: “Breaking a Lease in New York | Tenant & Property Manager Rights”
other 65 10.2× 277
https://www.public.law/sources/air-university-wild-blue-yonder/items/the-united-states-and-the-international-criminal-court-is-it-time-to-reaffirm-our-signatory-status-to-the-rome-statute
Bibliographic info: “The United States and the International Criminal Court: Is It Time to Reaffirm Our Signatory Status to the Rome Statute?”
other 65 12.4× 242
https://www.public.law/sources/american-bar-association/items/agency-policy-challenges-a-different-way-to-fight-an-assessment
Bibliographic info: “Agency Policy Challenges: A Different Way to Fight an Assessment”
other 65 13.3× 218
https://www.public.law/sources/las-vegas-defense-group/items/nevada-lemon-law-5-things-consumers-need-to-know
Bibliographic info: “Nevada Lemon Law – 5 Things Consumers Need to Know”
other 65 10.3× 287
https://www.public.law/sources/doorloop/items/breaking-a-lease-in-nevada-tenant-property-manager-rights
Bibliographic info: “Breaking a Lease in Nevada | Tenant & Property Manager Rights”
other 65 11.5× 244
https://www.public.law/sources/lieber-institute-for-law-warfare-at-west-point/items/the-united-states-should-ratify-the-rome-statute
Bibliographic info: “The United States Should Ratify the Rome Statute”
other 65 13.7× 204
https://www.public.law/sources/national-library-of-medicine
Bibliographic info: “National Library of Medicine”
other 55 19.2× 121
https://www.public.law/sources/cdc-emerging-infectious-diseases/items/epidemiology-and-spatial-emergence-of-anaplasmosis-new-york-usa-2010-2018
Bibliographic info: “Epidemiology and Spatial Emergence of Anaplasmosis, New York, USA, 2010‒2018”
other 55 15.0× 180
https://www.public.law/sources/connecteam/items/new-york-labor-laws-2023-minimum-wage-overtime-more
Bibliographic info: “New York Labor Laws 2023 | Minimum Wage, Overtime & More”
about 55 15.1× 172
https://www.public.law/sources/doorloop
Bibliographic info: “DoorLoop”
other 55 18.7× 123
https://www.public.law/sources/jd-supra/items/closing-up-shop-your-company-and-you
Bibliographic info: “Closing up Shop: Your Company and You”
about 55 15.0× 172
https://www.public.law/sources/lohrke-law/items/changes-to-oregon-expungement-law-eligibility
Bibliographic info: “Changes to Oregon Expungement Law Eligibility”
other 55 14.8× 178
https://www.public.law/sources/naqvi-injury-law/items/dos-and-don-ts-with-an-insurance-company-after-an-accident
Bibliographic info: “Dos and Don'ts with an Insurance Company After an Accident”
about 55 16.1× 160
https://www.public.law/sources/naqvi-injury-law/items/turn-down-the-volume-to-reduce-accidents
Bibliographic info: “Turn Down the Volume to Reduce Accidents”
other 55 13.8× 189
https://www.public.law/sources/air-university-wild-blue-yonder
Bibliographic info: “Air University / Wild Blue Yonder”
other 55 18.3× 128
https://www.public.law/sources/american-bar-association
Bibliographic info: “American Bar Association”
other 55 20.0× 115
Showing 20 of 69 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/sources/ 67 57 0% 16.3× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 47 0% 26.1× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 32 1% 114.0× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 69 pages
nevada.public.law ×68
california.public.law ×68
instagram.com ×68
florida.public.law ×68
github.com ×68
colorado.public.law ×68
texas.public.law ×68
twitter.com ×68
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/public.law

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to public.law. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
public.law (this site) 49 71 Custom / Proprietary 17.1× 2
monsterlabs.co.kr 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.6× 1 Compare →
ostrog.rayon.in.ua 74 84 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 1 Compare →
life.rayon.in.ua 74 82 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 1 Compare →
letarnlibre.com 74 79 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 4 Compare →
ujvilagekszerora.hu 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite public.law when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to public.law. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 5% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Public?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Public does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Public work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Public."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for public.law:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
79
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history