proxibid.com 49 D
🛡️ SEO 40 🤖 GEO 58 ⚡ Perf 22 🏗️ Arch 78

proxibid.com — Global SEODiff Score 49/100

proxibid.com
📊

At 66/100, the ACRI for proxibid.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places proxibid.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 46.1× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

49
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (22) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (46×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than proxibid.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)40 × 0.25 = 10.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)58 × 0.40 = 23.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)22 × 0.20 = 4.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 10.0 + 23.2 + 4.4 + 11.7
Global SEODiff Score = 49 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
32
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #17154
+41 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 42%
Score 66/100

proxibid.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why proxibid.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat46.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

40/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

71 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

156 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 25
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.proxibid.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

58/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
proxibid.com
43
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 32/100 — Low
Structured Elements 81 elements (81 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2618
Raw Density3.1%
💡Low structure score (32/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 81 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

36
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability36/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (33.8 KB)Bloat (1525.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio46.1× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context68% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage81 / 119 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 1559.3 KB, but only 33.8 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (46.1×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.8% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 8662 / Noise: 390511 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time3042 ms
Raw HTML Size1559.3 KB
Visible Text Size33.8 KB

Performance & Speed

22/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3042 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2007
DOM nodes
1559 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.proxibid.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

208
internal links
14
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 43/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for proxibid.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/proxibid.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=proxibid.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
43
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
44
Avg across 10 pages · Range 26–56
Topical Cohesion
7%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
6352
Avg Bloat
349.3×
Ext. Citations
11
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://proxibid.com/pricing
Advanced Search Online Auctions | Proxibid
pricing 56 26.4× 710
https://proxibid.com/about
Advanced Search Online Auctions | Proxibid
about 56 26.4× 710
https://proxibid.com/products
Advanced Search Online Auctions | Proxibid
product 56 26.4× 710
https://proxibid.com/features
Advanced Search Online Auctions | Proxibid
product 56 26.6× 710
https://proxibid.com/docs
Online Live & Timed Auctions: Connecting Buyers with Sellers | Proxibid
docs 56 113.9× 2606
https://proxibid.com/faq
Advanced Search Online Auctions | Proxibid
support 56 26.6× 710
https://proxibid.com/blog
Advanced Search Online Auctions | Proxibid
pricing 26 811.7× 49 💰 Pricing
https://proxibid.com/case-studies
Advanced Search Online Auctions | Proxibid
pricing 26 811.7× 49 💰 Pricing
https://proxibid.com/contact
Advanced Search Online Auctions | Proxibid
pricing 26 811.7× 49 💰 Pricing
https://proxibid.com/integrations
Advanced Search Online Auctions | Proxibid
pricing 26 811.7× 49 💰 Pricing
🔗
Outbound External Citations
11 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
app.taycor.com ×6
auctiontechnologygroup.com ×4
youtube.com ×4
twitter.com ×4
proxibid.zendesk.com ×4
instagram.com ×4
linkedin.com ×4
support.proxibid.com ×4
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/proxibid.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to proxibid.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
proxibid.com (this site) 43 66 Custom / Proprietary 46.1× 0
fj-volga.com 43 68 Custom / Proprietary 45.5× 0 Compare →
lsweb.com.au 44 68 Custom / Proprietary 45.9× 0 Compare →
golden-kitchen.com 42 69 Custom / Proprietary 45.8× 0 Compare →
cbcmusic.ca 43 66 Custom / Proprietary 45.2× 0 Compare →
hessen-verliebt-sich.de 44 68 Custom / Proprietary 46.6× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to proxibid.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Proxibid",
  "url": "https://proxibid.com",
  "logo": "https://proxibid.com/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Proxibid",
  "url": "https://proxibid.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://proxibid.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Proxibid?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Proxibid does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Proxibid work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Proxibid."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for proxibid.com:

Current Score
66
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history