podruge.ru 64 C
🛡️ SEO 55 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 28 🏗️ Arch 80

podruge.ru — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

podruge.ru
📊

With a solid 82/100 ACRI, podruge.ru is well-positioned for AI search — better than 96% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, podruge.ru outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 6.3× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Rich structured data (9 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (28) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 16
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than podruge.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)55 × 0.25 = 13.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)28 × 0.20 = 5.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 13.8 + 32.4 + 5.6 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
63
Structure
avg 35
58
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #640036
-60 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

podruge.ru ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 4%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why podruge.ru ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage9 blocks
Token bloat6.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

55/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

151 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

275 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 28
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://podruge.ru/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Лазерная эпиляция и косметология. Круглосуточная сеть салонов красоты «Подружки»
  • ✓ og:description — Каждый салон красоты сети «Подружки» комплексно решат любую проблему и предлагает скидки до 70% на лазерную эпиляцию, косметологию и коррекцию фигуры.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
podruge.ru
70
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 63/100 — Good
Structured Elements 613 elements (613 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words5085
Raw Density12.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks9 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

74
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability74/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

15%
🗑️ 85%
Useful Content (149.9 KB)Bloat (799.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.3× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context23% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage7 / 31 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 23% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 84.2% · SNR: 0.19 · Signal: 38361 / Noise: 204700 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of podruge.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Сеть клиник «Подружки» предоставляет комплексные услуги аппаратной и инъекционной косметологии, включая лазерную эпиляцию, коррекцию фигуры и процедуры для поддержания красоты
Target Audience
Women aged 25-55 seeking cosmetic procedures, including hair removal, skin rejuvenation, and body contouring; men seeking similar services.
Pricing Model
Discounted pricing on services (up to 1000 ₽) for various procedures, including laser hair removal, injection cosmetology, and body contouring.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Combination of advanced laser technology (Candela GentleLase-Pro, LightSheer Duet) and a comprehensive range of cosmetic services, combined with a loyalty program and accessible pricing.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Discount offers on servicesLaser type descriptions (Candela GentleLase-Pro, LightSheer Duet)Service descriptions (laser hair removal, injection cosmetology, etc.)
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-29

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx/1.22.1
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1029 ms
Raw HTML Size949.5 KB
Visible Text Size149.9 KB

Performance & Speed

28/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1029 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4431
DOM nodes
950 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://podruge.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

549
internal links
24
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 70/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for podruge.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/podruge.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=podruge.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
70
Single-page score
-48
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
22
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–77
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 70, but internal pages average only 22 — a -48-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
29%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
71540
Avg Bloat
11.0×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://podruge.ru/faq
Вопросы и ответы – «Подружки» в Москве
pricing 77 16.2× 64861 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://podruge.ru/about
Сеть клиник «Подружки» в Москве
about 72 49.4× 3358
https://podruge.ru/blog
Полезная информация об эпиляции в Москве
blog 72 44.2× 3321
https://podruge.ru/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://podruge.ru/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://podruge.ru/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://podruge.ru/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://podruge.ru/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://podruge.ru/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://podruge.ru/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 72 0% 49.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 72 0% 44.2× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 77 0% 16.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
disk.yandex.ru ×3
youtube.com ×3
b347565.yclients.com ×3
t.me ×3
max.ru ×3
vk.com ×3
vk.cc ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/podruge.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to podruge.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
podruge.ru (this site) 70 82 Express 6.3× 9
jagoanchetslot.com 87 92 Express 6.5× 8 Compare →
adelaideaccountant.com 86 87 Express 5.1× 4 Compare →
sos-accessoire.com 86 93 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
sos-zubehoer.de 88 95 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
calulu-dogwear.jp 86 88 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 9 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite podruge.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to podruge.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Podruge?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Podruge does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Podruge work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Podruge."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for podruge.ru:

Current Score
82
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history