playinmatch.com 62 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 71 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 77

playinmatch.com — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

playinmatch.com
📊

playinmatch.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 75/100, outperforming 81% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, playinmatch.com outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The rendering approach is hybrid, with a moderate ghost ratio of 15% — most content is accessible without JS, though some elements are client-rendered. A 10.9× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 25 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than playinmatch.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)71 × 0.40 = 28.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)77 × 0.15 = 11.5
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 28.4 + 9.4 + 11.5
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
80
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.2%
Rank #1703
+19 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

playinmatch.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why playinmatch.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat10.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

50 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

135 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://playinmatch.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

71/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
playinmatch.com
55
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 80/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 85 elements (85 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words444
Raw Density19.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

57
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability57/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (40/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

9%
🗑️ 91%
Useful Content (16.0 KB)Bloat (158.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio10.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context65% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage73 / 113 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 90.8% · SNR: 0.10 · Signal: 4093 / Noise: 40524 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of playinmatch.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Playinmatch provides a platform for live sports betting and in-play gaming, offering a wide selection of sports markets and casino games.
Target Audience
Sports bettors, casino game enthusiasts, and users seeking immediate in-play wagering opportunities.
Pricing Model
The text does not specify a pricing model. It implies a subscription or access-based model.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive sports market coverage and a focus on in-play betting provide a competitive advantage.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu)
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1219 ms
Raw HTML Size174.3 KB
Visible Text Size16.0 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1219 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

981
DOM nodes
174 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

3
tracker scripts
3
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comintercom.iogoogle-analytics.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

77/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://playinmatch.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

47
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 55/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for playinmatch.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/playinmatch.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=playinmatch.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 19 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
55
Single-page score
-28
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
28
Avg across 19 pages · Range 19–64
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 55, but internal pages average only 28 — a -28-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
30760
Avg Bloat
89.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://playinmatch.com/mobile/in-play
Playinmatch | Best Sportsbook & Live Mobile Games
other 64 19.7× 12103
https://playinmatch.com/mobile/sports
PlayinMatch | Best Cricket & Auto Cashout | Live Mobile Sports
other 59 20.5× 17227
https://playinmatch.com/mobile/help
PlayinMatch | Contact Playinmatch Support Team | Help Center
support 53 41.2× 727
https://playinmatch.com/casino
PlayinMatch | Online Live Sports and Fantasy Games
other 43 117.1× 330
https://playinmatch.com/mobile/sportsbook/in-play
PlayinMatch In-Play Cashout Games | Mobile Platform
other 43 101.5× 373
https://playinmatch.com/features product 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/docs docs 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/blog blog 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/case-studies social-proof 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/integrations integrations 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/faq support 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/contact support 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/kyc other 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/redirect/facebook other 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/policy other 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/au other 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/tnc other 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/rg other 19 100.0× 0
https://playinmatch.com/rnr other 19 100.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/mobile/ 4 55 0% 45.7× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/kyc/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/tnc/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/rnr/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/au/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/rg/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/policy/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/casino/ 1 43 1% 117.1× Bot Blocked
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/playinmatch.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to playinmatch.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
playinmatch.com (this site) 55 75 Custom / Proprietary 10.9× 0
freedom.net 80 84 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 1 Compare →
ampir.ru 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.3× 2 Compare →
myparking.it 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 2 Compare →
ducfarm.ro 80 85 Custom / Proprietary 4.2× 3 Compare →
steerlink.co.jp 80 85 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

19
Homepage ACRI
31
Inner Avg ACRI
-12
ACRI Delta
70%
Homepage Ghost
61%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
19 70% other https://playinmatch.com/kyc
19 70% docs https://playinmatch.com/docs
19 70% social-proof https://playinmatch.com/case-studies
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 35/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

9 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

37
Total Links
9
Unique Domains
2.5
Avg/Page
24%
Diversity
api.whatsapp.com youtube.com facebook.com instagram.com wa.me t.me x.com pinterest.com tumblr.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 70.7

AI trust scores for the domains playinmatch.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to playinmatch.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Playinmatch",
  "url": "https://playinmatch.com",
  "logo": "https://playinmatch.com/favicons/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Playinmatch",
  "url": "https://playinmatch.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://playinmatch.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 9% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Playinmatch?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Playinmatch does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Playinmatch work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Playinmatch."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for playinmatch.com:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history