pair.com 68 C
🛡️ SEO 80 🤖 GEO 66 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 81

pair.com — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

pair.com
📊

With a solid 84/100 ACRI, pair.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 98% of sites in the Radar. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places pair.com above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 24.3× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (24×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 22 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than pair.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)80 × 0.25 = 20.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)66 × 0.40 = 26.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 20.0 + 26.4 + 9.4 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
39
Structure
avg 36
84
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.7%
Rank #6853
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

pair.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why pair.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat24.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

80/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

50 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

155 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 12
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.pair.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Buy A Domain | Website Hosting | Custom Web Design
  • ✓ og:description — Buy a domain, get reliable website hosting, and launch with affordable web design. Everything you need to build your online presence—backed by 25+ years.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

66/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
pair.com
59
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 39/100 — Low
Structured Elements 61 elements (61 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1335
Raw Density4.6%
💡Low structure score (39/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 61 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

62
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability62/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (8.8 KB)Bloat (205.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio24.3× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context31% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage4 / 13 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 214.2 KB, but only 8.8 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (24.3×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 31% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.9% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 2254 / Noise: 52572 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1066 ms
Raw HTML Size214.2 KB
Visible Text Size8.8 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1066 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

954
DOM nodes
214 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=600
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
crazyegg.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.pair.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

61
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 59/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for pair.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/pair.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=pair.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 29 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
59
Single-page score
+3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
62
Avg across 29 pages · Range 54–69
Topical Cohesion
24%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
21908
Avg Bloat
59.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.pair.com/wordpress-hosting/
Managed WordPress Hosting | WordPress Backup | Staging Site
pricing 69 36.8× 1325 💰 Pricing
https://pair.com/about
About - Pair Networks
pricing 64 59.8× 648 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/about/
About - Pair Networks
pricing 64 59.8× 648 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/pairedup/additional-website-services/
Website Services | Website SEO | Logo Design | Brand Style Guide
pricing 64 55.3× 877 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/vps-hosting/
VPS Web Hosting | VPS Domain Hosting | Pair Networks
pricing 64 42.4× 1023 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/referral-program/
Web Hosting Referral Program | Pair Networks Referral
pricing 64 48.6× 709 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/pairedup/affordable-web-design/
Affordable Web Design | Webpage Templates | PairedUp Express
pricing 64 61.2× 675 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/move-to-pair/
Website Migration | Pair Website Migration Services
pricing 64 42.1× 1021 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/podcast-websites/
Podcast Websites | Website for Podcasts | Pair Networks
pricing 64 53.0× 852 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/site-backups/
Website Backup Service | Site Recovery | Pair Networks
pricing 64 51.8× 815 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/content-delivery-network-cdn/
Content Delivery Network by Pair Networks
pricing 64 53.5× 738 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/software-installation-manager-sim/
Software Installation Manager | PairSIM | Pair Networks
pricing 64 84.5× 546 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/pairedup/custom-website-design/
Website Design | Custom Web Design | PairedUp Custom
pricing 64 72.0× 665 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/intrusion-defense/
Best Malware Removal | Best Malware Protection | Pair
pricing 64 39.2× 1069 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/ssl-certificates/
Buy SSL Certificates | Let’s Encrypt | Cheap SSL Certificate
pricing 64 42.1× 1042 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/pairedup/website-maintenance-services/
Website Maintenance | Website Updates | PairedUp Maintenance
pricing 64 69.1× 600 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/help-me-choose/
Domain Hosting Comparison | Compare Web Hosting | Pair
pricing 64 41.2× 893 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/shared-hosting/
Shared Hosting - Pair Networks
pricing 64 52.5× 896 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/pair-site-builder/
Pair Site Builder - Pair Networks
pricing 64 62.3× 776 💰 Pricing
https://www.pair.com/special-offers/
Free Web Hosting | WordPress Hosting Packages | Website Deals
pricing 64 37.8× 857 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 29 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pairedup/ 5 64 0% 62.5× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 2 54 0% 82.4× High JS Bloat
/about/ 2 64 0% 59.8× High JS Bloat
/404-2/ 1 54 0% 85.9× High JS Bloat
/move-to-pair/ 1 64 0% 42.1× High JS Bloat
/corporate-info/ 1 54 0% 100.7× High JS Bloat
/pair-platinum-mail/ 1 64 0% 38.3× High JS Bloat
/wp-site-builder/ 1 64 0% 65.1× High JS Bloat
/intrusion-defense/ 1 64 0% 39.1× High JS Bloat
/ssl-certificates/ 1 64 0% 42.1× High JS Bloat
/referral-program/ 1 64 0% 48.6× High JS Bloat
/wordpress-hosting/ 1 69 0% 36.8× High JS Bloat
/pair-site-builder/ 1 64 0% 62.3× High JS Bloat
/podcast-websites/ 1 64 0% 53.0× High JS Bloat
/billing-exit-survey/ 1 54 0% 93.4× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 29 pages
twitter.com ×29
my.pair.com ×29
youtube.com ×29
rc.webmail.pair.com ×29
whois.pairdomains.com ×29
policy.pair.com ×29
instagram.com ×29
facebook.com ×29
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/pair.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to pair.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
pair.com (this site) 59 84 WordPress 24.3× 2
dedikuoti.lt 84 92 WordPress 1.5× 4 Compare →
aboutnurseassistantjobs.com 84 91 WordPress 5.5× 4 Compare →
tissus-price.com 84 90 WordPress 2.7× 5 Compare →
aboutams.com 84 92 WordPress 4.2× 8 Compare →
footballstore.ru 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

64
Homepage ACRI
62
Inner Avg ACRI
+2
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
40%
Inner Avg Ghost
1
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
54 40% pricing https://pair.com/contact
64 40% pricing https://www.pair.com/about/
54 40% pricing https://www.pair.com/contact/
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

B 70/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Named leadership: Peter K., Kathy V., LEC
Address: 2403 Sidney St, Suite 210 Pittsburgh PA 15203 Move to Pair Manage Consent To provide the best
🔗

Citation Profile

18 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

173
Total Links
18
Unique Domains
11.5
Avg/Page
10%
Diversity
cookiedatabase.org pairdomains.com my.pair.com policy.pair.com rc.webmail.pair.com instagram.com facebook.com youtube.com twitter.com whois.pairdomains.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 42.9

AI trust scores for the domains pair.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to pair.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Pair?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Pair does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Pair work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Pair."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for pair.com:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history