ostrom.de 67 C
🛡️ SEO 84 🤖 GEO 64 ⚡ Perf 36 🏗️ Arch 87

ostrom.de — Global SEODiff Score 67/100

ostrom.de
📊

At 71/100, the ACRI for ostrom.de indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), ostrom.de performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The bloated 16.3× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Rich structured data (4 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

67
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (36) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 19, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 19
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than ostrom.de?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)84 × 0.25 = 21.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)64 × 0.40 = 25.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)36 × 0.20 = 7.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)87 × 0.15 = 13.0
Weighted sum = 21.0 + 25.6 + 7.2 + 13.0
Global SEODiff Score = 67 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
6
Structure
avg 35
48
Schema
avg 9
80
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 40%
Rank #395600
-9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

ostrom.de is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why ostrom.de ranks here

Tech stackShopify
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat16.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

84/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

64 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

159 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.ostrom.de/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Ostrom™ – Ökostrom: smart, flexibel oder mit Preisgarantie.
  • ✓ og:description — 100 % TÜV-zertifizierter Ökostrom: Spare bis zu 35 % deiner Stromkosten mit flexiblen Tarifen, stündlichen Smart-Meter-Preisen oder 12-Monats-Preisgarantie.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

64/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
ostrom.de
49
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 6/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 5 elements (5 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words4623
Raw Density0.1%
💡Low structure score (6/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 5 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

44
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability44/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

6%
🗑️ 94%
Useful Content (37.0 KB)Bloat (567.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio16.3× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context22% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage67 / 304 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 22% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 93.9% · SNR: 0.07 · Signal: 9481 / Noise: 145288 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of ostrom.de and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Ostrom provides a digital green electricity platform that enables users to access dynamic electricity tariffs and virtual power plants, primarily
Target Audience
Homeowners, businesses, and EV drivers interested in renewable energy, smart home integration, and cost savings; energy managers, sustainability professionals, and fleet operators.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based, with tiered pricing based on usage and features. Likely a freemium model with paid plans offering advanced functionality and support.
🔗 Integration Partners
VaillantBullfinch
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered dynamic pricing and virtual power plant capabilities, combined with a strong focus on user-friendly green energy solutions and a growing ecosystem of smart home integrations.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Blog posts on topics like ‘dynamic tariffs’, ‘virtual power plant’, ‘renewable energy’, ‘E-Autos’, ‘Netzentgelte’Template-generated pages for features like ‘Ostrom Wallet’ and ‘Solar Integration’
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Complexity of switching to dynamic tariffs
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-18

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkShopify
AI-Readiness Score80/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time635 ms
Raw HTML Size604.6 KB
Visible Text Size37.0 KB

Performance & Speed

36/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

635 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

6531
DOM nodes
605 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
amplitude.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

87/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.ostrom.de/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

100
internal links
38
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 49/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for ostrom.de
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/ostrom.de" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=ostrom.de" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
49
Single-page score
-38
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
11
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–67
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 49, but internal pages average only 11 — a -38-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
3%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
7432
Avg Bloat
6.4×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://ostrom.de/blog
Unser Blog ⚡️ Ostrom™
pricing 67 10.3× 7021 💰 Pricing
https://ostrom.de/faq
Ostrom Help Center
support 43 53.7× 411 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://ostrom.de/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://ostrom.de/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://ostrom.de/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://ostrom.de/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://ostrom.de/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://ostrom.de/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://ostrom.de/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://ostrom.de/contact support 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 67 0% 10.3× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 43 1% 53.7× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
twitter.com ×2
facebook.com ×2
support.ostrom.de ×2
youtube.com ×2
store.ostrom.de ×2
instagram.com ×2
ostrom.typeform.com ×2
linkedin.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/ostrom.de

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to ostrom.de. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
ostrom.de (this site) 49 71 Shopify 16.3× 4
palermoperfumes.com.au 74 85 Shopify 9.7× 3 Compare →
nitrosnowboards.com 74 88 Shopify 7.9× 3 Compare →
longstreth.com 74 85 Shopify 6.3× 2 Compare →
millioncases.in 74 87 Shopify 5.5× 2 Compare →
amigofoods.com 74 87 Shopify 4.4× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite ostrom.de when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to ostrom.de. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 6% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for ostrom.de:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
76
Improvement
+5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →