What is note.com's AI readiness score?

note.com scores 67/100 on SEODiff's AI-Readiness Index, placing it in the Moderate range. The ACRI (AI-Crawler Reality Index) score is 39/100 (Grade F).

What tech stack does note.com use?

note.com uses Next.js as its primary framework with a 5% ghost ratio (SSR rendering).

Is note.com visible to AI crawlers like ChatGPT?

GPTBot access: Allowed. ClaudeBot access: Allowed. note.com has 1 structured data blocks and a token bloat ratio of 40.2x.

note.com SEO & AI Readiness Score: 52/100 (D) — Full Technical Audit

📊

At 67/100, the ACRI for note.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places note.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The bloated 40.2× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

D — Global SEODiff Score

Comprehensive search visibility assessment

Below average — Performance (28) needs urgent attention.

🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (40×) → +5–10 pts

🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API

Does your site score higher than note.com?

Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.

Scan Your Site Free →

🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?

🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)54 × 0.25 = 13.5

🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)52 × 0.40 = 20.8

⚡ Performance (20% weight)28 × 0.20 = 5.6

🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4

Weighted sum = 13.5 + 20.8 + 5.6 + 12.4

Global SEODiff Score = 52 (D)

📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)

100

Bot Access

avg 92

Rendering

avg 93

Structure

avg 35

Schema

avg 10

Tech Stack

avg 64

🔀

Visibility Delta: Google vs AI

Google (Tranco)

Top 0.1%

Rank #1004

+39 pts

Gap

AI (ACRI)

Top 39%

Score 67/100

note.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why note.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js

Industryinfrastructure

RenderingSSR

Schema coverage1 blocks

Token bloat40.2×

Fastest improvements

Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →

🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…

Overview 🛡️ SEO 🤖 GEO ⚡ Perf 🏗️ Arch Remediation Export

See other Next.js sites → infrastructure industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →

🛡️

Traditional SEO

54/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

53 chars

Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

327 chars

Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

✓ Canonical tag present → https://note.com
✓ No noindex directive
✓ Meta viewport set
✓ HTML lang attribute → ja-JP
✗ Hreflang tags
✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

✓ og:title — note ――つくる、つながる、とどける。
✓ og:description — クリエイターが文章やマンガ、写真、音声を投稿することができ、ユーザーはそのコンテンツを楽しんで応援できるメディアプラットフォームです。だれもが創作を楽しんで続けられるよう、安心できる雰囲気や、多様性を大切にしています。
✓ og:image — preview
✗ twitter:card

📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

52/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research

💡

Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →

note.com

Your ACRI Score

→

safely.co.jp

Industry Peer ACRI

AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.

📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅

GPTBot (OpenAI)

Allowed

✅

ClaudeBot (Anthropic)

Allowed

✅

CCBot (Common Crawl)

Allowed

✅

Google-Extended

Allowed

✅

Googlebot

Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%

0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk

Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)

Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 24/100 — Low

Structured Elements 11 elements (11 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)

Total Words656

Raw Density1.7%

💡Low structure score (24/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 11 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing

Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found

Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected

❌ Organization

❌ Product/Service

❌ Breadcrumb

❌ FAQ

❌ Article

✅ WebSite

💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.

💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.

💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

AI Extractability

High

Crawl Cost

None

Blocklist Risk

Extractability35/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page

Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process

Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

🗑️ 98%

Useful Content (27.2 KB)Bloat (1065.1 KB)

Token Bloat Ratio40.2× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context1% Optimized for Vision

Image Alt Coverage3 / 217 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set

X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

💡Your HTML is 1092.3 KB, but only 27.2 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (40.2×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

💡Only 1% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy

Poor Token Bloat: High

Noise Ratio: 97.5% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 6961 / Noise: 272672 tokens

Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐

This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.

🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js

AI-Readiness Score70/100

Server—

CDN—

HTTP Status200

Load Time1251 ms

Raw HTML Size1092.3 KB

Visible Text Size27.2 KB

⚡

Performance & Speed

28/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1251 ms

Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4775
DOM nodes

1092 KB
HTML payload

Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache="Set-Cookie"
✗ CDN cache status
✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

4
tracker scripts

2
third-party domains

6.5%
token overhead

Moderate trackers — consider lazy-loading non-essential scripts

google-analytics.comgoogletagmanager.com

📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://note.com/sitemaps/production/note.com/sitemap.xml.gz
✓ Googlebot allowed
✓ GPTBot allowed
✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

325
internal links

5
external links

Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
✓ Content-Security-Policy header
✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

✓ HTML lang attribute → ja-JP
✓ Meta viewport for mobile
✓ Single H1 for screen readers

📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 39/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold

<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/note.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=note.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

[![AI-Verified by SEODiff](https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=note.com)](https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/note.com)

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 109 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI

Single-page score

-1

Consistent readability

Δ delta

Site-Wide ACRI

Avg across 109 pages · Range 22–53

Total Words

12814

Avg Bloat

1448.6×

Ext. Citations

100

Page	Type	ACRI	Token Bloat	Words	Status
https://note.com/contests/finished 募集を終了したお題・コンテスト｜note（ノート）	other	53	162.9×	1682	✓
https://note.com/contests 募集中のお題・コンテスト｜note（ノート）	other	53	250.8×	985	✓
https://note.com/yukiao 青山裕企｜note	pricing	50	470.7×	227	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/hakuten_corp HAKUTEN \| 体験をつくるクリエイティブカンパニー｜note	pricing	50	505.8×	217	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/notemagazine noteマガジン｜note	pricing	40	811.2×	131	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/jsaa 日本スポーツアナリスト協会（JSAA）｜note	pricing	40	842.9×	123	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/optimind 株式会社オプティマインド｜note	pricing	40	838.1×	119	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/sacckey sacckey🙋‍♂️｜note	pricing	40	1062.5×	83	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/cuc_com CUCグループ公式note｜note	pricing	40	837.8×	116	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/ppt_ws パーソルワークスイッチコンサルティング株式会社｜note	pricing	40	1040.4×	103	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/note_gadget note IT｜note	pricing	40	649.6×	149	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/note_comic noteマンガ｜note	pricing	40	825.5×	135	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/nsalon Nサロン-日経とnoteによる学びのコミュニティ-｜note	pricing	40	883.7×	111	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/ikimono_gakari いきものがかり｜note	pricing	40	1048.3×	81	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/notemag note編集部｜note	pricing	40	861.2×	126	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/ga9ji ga9ji｜note	pricing	40	796.1×	121	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/events noteイベント情報｜note	pricing	40	800.7×	133	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/unityjapan Unity Japan（ユニティ・テクノロジーズ・ジャパン）｜note	pricing	40	680.0×	180	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/takeshobo Takeshobo Books｜note	pricing	40	900.6×	117	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/tiktok TikTok Japan【公式】ティックトック｜note	pricing	40	695.8×	157	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/tamochaos 漆畑美佳｜note	pricing	40	1096.9×	85	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/info note公式｜note	pricing	40	901.5×	124	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/sugarcorp SUGAR株式会社｜note	pricing	40	812.4×	71	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/uuum_official UUUM｜note	pricing	40	1014.3×	87	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/zochang zochang	pricing	40	796.0×	112	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/warc 株式会社WARC｜note	pricing	40	841.5×	121	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/yuki_doro 松下ゆき｜note	pricing	40	1058.8×	89	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/guchimarie marie.iguchi｜note	pricing	40	934.5×	116	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/spla_premier PremierLeague プレミアリーグ｜note	pricing	40	579.2×	134	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/ochyai 落合陽一｜note	pricing	40	994.6×	96	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/player_twi Player! この世界にスポーツダイバーシティを｜note	pricing	40	637.0×	166	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/megaya megaya｜note	pricing	40	1102.2×	84	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/maikoo なかのまいこ｜note	pricing	40	815.3×	81	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/d2c_opecen D2C宮崎・沖縄・新潟オフィス｜note	pricing	40	935.3×	115	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/ichibyo3 一秒@マンガ家	pricing	40	876.8×	101	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/asahi_books 朝日新聞出版さんぽ｜note	pricing	40	842.3×	130	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/bitkey 株式会社ビットキー｜note	pricing	40	820.5×	117	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/rushgaming Rush Gaming｜note	pricing	40	665.9×	137	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/kawata_note 加和太建設株式会社　- 静岡県東部のまちづくりで「元気」をつくる会社 -｜note	pricing	40	649.8×	164	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/sionnet 株式会社シオン｜note	pricing	40	800.6×	145	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/tsugumakazuki 津隈和樹｜note	pricing	40	864.2×	97	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/ethna2 ethna2｜note	pricing	40	767.9×	77	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/note_games noteゲーム｜note	pricing	40	777.4×	126	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/atusko0713 あつこ｜note	pricing	40	988.9×	98	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/dentetsu テレ東電鉄（テレビ東京公式）｜note	pricing	40	1265.0×	78	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/reject REJECT｜note	pricing	40	887.9×	93	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/notemag_sports noteスポーツ｜note	pricing	40	976.9×	97	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/nozomiayg nozomi aoyagi｜note	pricing	40	702.7×	131	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/payment_notecom クリエイター名｜note	pricing	40	517.5×	198	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/antlers_official 鹿島アントラーズ｜note	pricing	40	1068.8×	96	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/backstage_riot BACKSTAGE｜note	pricing	40	921.4×	92	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/ttec_cvc 東芝テックCVC｜note	pricing	40	962.7×	107	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/aokishi 青騎士｜note	pricing	40	981.8×	85	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/naraclub 奈良クラブ｜note	pricing	40	872.4×	104	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/adways megaphone / adways note｜note	pricing	40	571.8×	183	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/masafumiyagi 八木雅史｜note	pricing	40	549.5×	138	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/reico_ reico.｜note	pricing	40	882.3×	84	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/snjssk snjssk｜note	pricing	40	877.3×	101	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/dd_techblog Dentsu Digital Tech Blog｜note	pricing	40	524.1×	170	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/note_local note地域・行政｜note	pricing	40	1010.4×	107	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/note_education note教育｜note	pricing	40	892.5×	113	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/macromill ミルコミ│運営マクロミル｜note	pricing	40	894.0×	119	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/softbankhawks 福岡ソフトバンクホークス｜note	pricing	40	1183.5×	87	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/zetadivision ZETA DIVISION｜note	pricing	40	473.7×	177	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/montedio 【公式】モンテディオ山形｜note	pricing	40	1061.5×	86	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/soldout_official ソウルドアウト株式会社｜note	pricing	40	889.2×	139	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/yokohama_fc1999 横浜FC_OFFICIAL｜note	pricing	40	883.4×	104	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/minecraftcontest マイクラ創作コンテスト｜note	pricing	40	1069.8×	72	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/kiyoshidainagon いえもん	pricing	40	709.3×	165	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/shuei_camp ゲームクリエイターズCAMP｜note	pricing	40	932.0×	105	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/payment_dokudome payment_dokudome	pricing	40	527.0×	177	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/note_travel note旅行・おでかけ｜note	pricing	40	792.2×	123	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/notemag_reading note読書｜note	pricing	40	764.7×	134	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/horiprostage ホリプロステージ｜note	pricing	40	1147.2×	74	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/note_food noteフード｜note	pricing	40	948.4×	105	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/note_lifestyle noteライフスタイル｜note	pricing	40	715.7×	153	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/notemag_business noteビジネス｜note	pricing	40	917.1×	105	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/albbb 新潟アルビレックスＢＢ｜note	pricing	40	972.3×	83	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/volters 熊本ヴォルターズ｜note	pricing	40	1294.4×	55	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/bbtower_inc 株式会社ブロードバンドタワー｜note	pricing	40	868.4×	107	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/kakukatachi 投稿コンテスト「#2000字のドラマ」第2弾映像作品制作中!!｜note	pricing	40	1050.6×	101	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/wacom 株式会社ワコム｜note	pricing	40	1091.1×	87	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/bellpark_saiyou 株式会社ベルパーク採用公式note｜note	pricing	40	872.1×	127	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/washwizardsjp ワシントンウィザーズ｜note	pricing	40	883.6×	88	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/mini_hiori みーに｜note	pricing	40	1224.9×	60	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/note_entertain noteエンタメ｜note	pricing	40	802.8×	147	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/hashtag note ――つくる、つながる、とどける。	pricing	31	15032.0×	2	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/pricing 相関集｜note	pricing	30	1924.3×	13	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/hiuzerockets HIU ZEROCKETS.EXE｜note	pricing	30	2815.5×	21	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/notemag_society note社会｜note	pricing	30	954.1×	45	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/inabe_ayako inabe_ayako｜note	pricing	30	4837.6×	4	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/cakes cakes｜note	pricing	30	3058.1×	7	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/interlinknote299 interlink-haga	pricing	30	4000.0×	5	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/turkeyzawa たきざわ｜note	pricing	30	4813.4×	4	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/tatsuyukitohei 藤平達之（博報堂／SIX）｜note	pricing	30	2161.5×	12	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/dfmwin DetonatioN FocusMe｜note	pricing	30	2086.5×	16	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/notehowto2 notehowto｜note	pricing	30	3452.4×	6	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/mido10 mido10	pricing	30	3250.3×	7	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/saty_note sachi｜note	pricing	30	4788.0×	4	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/pocketpair ポケットペア｜note	pricing	30	3238.3×	7	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/bcleague ルートインBCリーグ｜note	pricing	30	5166.9×	8	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/hagio_asako はぎおあさこ｜note	pricing	30	1022.7×	38	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/usaguitar Manaho Otsuka｜note	pricing	30	3196.8×	6	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/gcg ゲームクリエイターズギルド｜note	pricing	30	2159.1×	26	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/notepro_sales notepro_sales	pricing	30	4617.9×	4	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/plf_dokudome plf_dokudome	pricing	30	4100.3×	5	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/ara_sakana たなざわあゆみ｜note	pricing	30	1542.1×	29	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/cloudy うちやま｜note	pricing	30	3163.7×	14	💰 Pricing
https://note.com/recommend 注目の記事一覧｜note	other	22	3542.1×	5	✓

🔗

Outbound External Citations

100 unique external domains cited across 109 pages

help-note.com ×109

premium.lp-note.com ×109

pro.lp-note.com ×109

terms.help-note.com ×109

twitter.com ×57

facebook.com ×36

youtube.com ×34

instagram.com ×26

🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/note.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to note.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain	ACRI	AI Score	Tech Stack	Token Bloat	Schema
note.com (this site)	39	67	Next.js	40.2×	1	—
travelbinger.com	38	15	Next.js	40.2×	1	Compare →
note.mu	39	67	Next.js	41.1×	1	Compare →
synergywholesale.net.au	41	65	Next.js	40.4×	1	Compare →
mxs.au	41	65	Next.js	40.4×	1	Compare →
synergywholesale.com	41	65	Next.js	40.4×	1	Compare →

Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to note.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD

High Impact ⏱ 5 min

AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.

html

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Note",
  "url": "https://note.com",
  "logo": "https://assets.st-note.com/poc-image/manual/note-common-images/production/svg/production.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>

Reduce Token Bloat

Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs

Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.

html

<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>

Add FAQ Schema

Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min

FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.

html

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Note?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Note does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Note work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Note."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>

📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for note.com:

Current Score

Projected Score

Improvement

+14 pts

Add Organization schema +6 pts

Reduce token bloat +5 pts

Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.

Template Drift

Track in My Site

Drift → Traffic Impact

In development coming soon

Regression Incidents

Track in My Site

Internal Linking

Deep Audit graph

Semantic Structure

GEO view in Deep Audit

Orphans & Hubs

Deep Audit sections

Content Quality

Thin/duplicate tracking

Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history

Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents

Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon

Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

Domain	ACRI	Direction
2nd-train.net	82	← cites you
route-inn.co.jp	77	← cites you
kyoto-np.co.jp	77	← cites you
tabio.com	77	← cites you
linebiz.com	75	← cites you
lycbiz.com	75	← cites you
heroz.jp	74	← cites you
ttrinity.jp	74	← cites you
jtb.co.jp	73	← cites you
4ndan.com	72	← cites you

Why note.com ranks here

Fastest improvements

JavaScript Rendering Check

Traditional SEO

📝 Title Tag

📋 Meta Description

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

🔍 Indexability

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

AI Readiness / GEO

Citation Alternatives

Hallucination Risk

Hallucination Risk Assessment

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Schema Coverage Map

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

Token Bloat Research

Multimodal Readiness

TDM Rights

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

📐 Semantic Structure

🧩 Content Chunks

🤖 What Each Bot Sees

AI Answer Preview

🔧 Tech Stack

Performance & Speed

⏱️ Time to First Byte

📦 Page Weight

🗄️ Cache & CDN

🔬 Tracker Tax

Architecture & Trust

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

🔗 Linking

🔒 Security & Trust

♿ Accessibility Signals

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

� Deep Crawl Analysis 109 pages · Deep-10

🔌 API Access

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Remediation Patches

Projected Impact

📧 Get your full report data

📋 Data Export

Is this your company?

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

🕒 History

🧠 AI Citation Graph

📚 Research & Documentation