myracing.com 70 B
🛡️ SEO 68 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 29 🏗️ Arch 90

myracing.com — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

myracing.com
📊

With a solid 76/100 ACRI, myracing.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 83% of sites in the Radar. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places myracing.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 5.1× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Rich structured data (133 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (29) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 11 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
📈 Mar 20 ACRI +1 (62→63)
📉 Mar 20 ACRI -1 (63→62)
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
📈 Mar 16 ACRI +1 (62→63)
Does your site score higher than myracing.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)68 × 0.25 = 17.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)29 × 0.20 = 5.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)90 × 0.15 = 13.5
Weighted sum = 17.0 + 33.2 + 5.8 + 13.5
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
27
Structure
avg 35
60
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 14%
Rank #141496
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

myracing.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why myracing.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage133 blocks
Token bloat5.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

68/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

70 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

156 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 28
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://myracing.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Horse Racing Predictions - myracing
  • ✓ og:description — Welcome to myracing.com, home of @myracingtips! Get free horse racing predictions from the experts at myracing.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
myracing.com
63
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 27/100 — Low
Structured Elements 57 elements (57 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2653
Raw Density2.2%
💡Low structure score (27/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 57 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks133 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

67
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability67/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

19%
🗑️ 81%
Useful Content (109.3 KB)Bloat (452.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.1× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context80% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage72 / 90 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 80.6% · SNR: 0.24 · Signal: 27969 / Noise: 115889 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of myracing.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
MyRacing provides daily horse racing tips and analysis for Australian racing, including NAP, Next Best, Win Accumulator, and Win Doubles
Target Audience
Australian punters, race enthusiasts, and bettors seeking daily horse racing tips and race information.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based model with various tiers offering different levels of access to tips and content. Includes promotional offers like ‘Bet £10, Get £30 in Free Bets’.
🔗 Integration Partners
Twitter
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive race coverage, daily tip updates, and a strong community of Australian racing followers.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-07

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time3548 ms
Raw HTML Size561.9 KB
Visible Text Size109.3 KB

Performance & Speed

29/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3548 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1395
DOM nodes
562 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

90/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://myracing.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

257
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 63/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for myracing.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/myracing.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=myracing.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
63
Single-page score
-51
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
12
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–77
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 63, but internal pages average only 12 — a -51-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
14%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
2887
Avg Bloat
13.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://myracing.com/about
About Australian Racing | myracing
about 77 14.2× 2712
https://myracing.com/contact
Contact Us | myracing
support 46 119.2× 175
https://myracing.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://myracing.com/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://myracing.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://myracing.com/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://myracing.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://myracing.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://myracing.com/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://myracing.com/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 46 1% 119.2× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 77 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
bet365.com ×2
instagram.com ×2
youtube.com ×2
twitter.com ×2
facebook.com ×2
m.me ×1
nrglinks.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/myracing.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to myracing.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
myracing.com (this site) 63 76 Next.js 5.1× 133
melbourneschool.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 4 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
centegrahealthyliving.com 87 94 Cloudflare Pages 5.4× 6 Compare →
oliverevolution.com 87 94 Cloudflare Pages 5.4× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite myracing.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to myracing.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Myracing?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Myracing does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Myracing work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Myracing."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for myracing.com:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →