mosme.net 66 C
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 71 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 80
Radar → Domains → mosme.net

mosme.net — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

mosme.net
📊

mosme.net currently sits at 54/100 on the ACRI scale, an average result that suggests several quick wins remain untapped. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places mosme.net below the industry average of 57 —, indicating room for competitive improvement. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Token bloat registers at 7.2× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Rich structured data (6 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. Most AI crawlers are restricted by robots.txt, limiting how AI-powered search engines can index and surface this content.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
75
🛡️ Traditional SEO
71
🤖 AI Readiness
34
⚡ Performance
80
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 13 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
📉 Mar 13 ACRI -1 (49→48)
Does your site score higher than mosme.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)71 × 0.40 = 28.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 28.4 + 6.8 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
40
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
9
Structure
avg 35
52
Schema
avg 9
80
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #795081
-21 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 58%
Score 54/100

mosme.net ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 58%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mosme.net ranks here

Tech stackNuxt.js
Industryinfrastructure
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage6 blocks
Token bloat7.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other Nuxt.js sites → infrastructure industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

84 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

186 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.mosme.net
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-TW
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — MOSME 行動學習一點通 | 教師備課、線上測驗、數位教材整合平台
  • ✓ og:description — MOSME 為國中、高中、高職教師提供備課、出題、班級管理一站式工具，學生可透過序號啟用線上題庫與電子教材，支援即時測驗與成績追蹤。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

71/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
mosme.net
48
Your ACRI Score
→
safely.co.jp
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

❌
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
❌
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
❌
Google-Extended
Blocked
✅
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 9/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 12 elements (12 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words5296
Raw Density0.2%
💡Low structure score (9/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 12 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks6 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

54
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
High
Blocklist Risk
Extractability54/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskHigh — 3 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (97.2 KB)Bloat (603.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.2× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context42% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage11 / 26 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 42% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.1% · SNR: 0.16 · Signal: 24880 / Noise: 154509 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of mosme.net and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
MOSME is a teaching management and mobile learning platform designed to assist teachers in effectively managing their classes, preparing lessons,
Target Audience
Teachers, educators, school administrators
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🔗 Integration Partners
OfficeProgram
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered grading assistance (coming soon) and a focus on deeply understanding and addressing the specific needs of the educational environment.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• 繁瑣流程
• 行政作業
• 繁瑣設定
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-04-05

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNuxt.js
AI-Readiness Score80/100
ServerMicrosoft-IIS/10.0
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time1283 ms
Raw HTML Size700.7 KB
Visible Text Size97.2 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1283 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1689
DOM nodes
701 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.mosme.net/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1196
internal links
20
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-TW
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 48/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mosme.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mosme.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mosme.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
48
Single-page score
-21
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
28
Avg across 10 pages · Range 26–44
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 48, but internal pages average only 28 — a -21-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
269
Avg Bloat
151.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://mosme.net/about
關於 MOSME | 全台超過萬名教師使用的教學管理平台
 about 44 165.4× 116 ✓
https://mosme.net/pricing
MOSME 行動學習一點通
 pricing 26 150.2× 17 💰 Pricing
https://mosme.net/features
MOSME 行動學習一點通
 pricing 26 150.2× 17 💰 Pricing
https://mosme.net/products
MOSME 行動學習一點通
 pricing 26 150.2× 17 💰 Pricing
https://mosme.net/blog
MOSME 行動學習一點通
 pricing 26 150.2× 17 💰 Pricing
https://mosme.net/docs
MOSME 行動學習一點通
 pricing 26 150.2× 17 💰 Pricing
https://mosme.net/case-studies
MOSME 行動學習一點通
 pricing 26 150.2× 17 💰 Pricing
https://mosme.net/integrations
MOSME 行動學習一點通
 pricing 26 150.2× 17 💰 Pricing
https://mosme.net/contact
MOSME 行動學習一點通
 pricing 26 150.2× 17 💰 Pricing
https://mosme.net/faq
MOSME 行動學習一點通
 pricing 26 150.2× 17 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 44 0% 165.4× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 26 0% 150.2× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 26 0% 150.2× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 26 0% 150.2× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 26 0% 150.2× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 26 0% 150.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 26 0% 150.2× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 26 0% 150.2× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 26 0% 150.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 26 0% 150.2× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
bao.ipoe.cc ×10
mlc.ipoe.cc ×1
youtube.com ×1
facebook.com ×1
apps.apple.com ×1
mes.jyic.net ×1
gtc.ipoe.cc ×1
tkdbook.jyic.net ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mosme.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mosme.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mosme.net (this site) 48 54 Nuxt.js 7.2× 6 —
wettfreunde.net 73 82 WordPress 5.8× 4 Compare →
55opt.org 73 82 Custom / Proprietary 5.6× 3 Compare →
haggar.com 73 87 Shopify 12.6× 5 Compare →
aydinpost.com 73 79 Cloudflare Pages 3.9× 3 Compare →
shopbecker.com 73 82 Custom / Proprietary 5.5× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite mosme.net when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mosme.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text 
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mosme.net:

Current Score
54
Projected Score
65
Improvement
+11 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.