mijnwoordenboek.nl 60 C
🛡️ SEO 35 🤖 GEO 70 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 65

mijnwoordenboek.nl — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

mijnwoordenboek.nl
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for mijnwoordenboek.nl is strong: an ACRI of 74/100 places it ahead of 79% of domains in the index. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places mijnwoordenboek.nl above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 15% ghost ratio suggests some content remains invisible to static crawlers. A 6.8× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site allows access to some AI bots but restricts others, creating an uneven visibility profile across AI-powered services.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (35) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than mijnwoordenboek.nl?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)35 × 0.25 = 8.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)70 × 0.40 = 28.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)65 × 0.15 = 9.8
Weighted sum = 8.8 + 28.0 + 13.6 + 9.8
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
75
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #19659
+20 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 21%
Score 74/100

mijnwoordenboek.nl punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mijnwoordenboek.nl ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat6.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

35/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

26 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

68 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → nl
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

70/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
mijnwoordenboek.nl
50
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 75/100 — Good
Structured Elements 27 elements (27 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words158
Raw Density17.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

71
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability71/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

14%
🗑️ 86%
Useful Content (3.2 KB)Bloat (18.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.8× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context13% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage1 / 8 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 13% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 85.2% · SNR: 0.17 · Signal: 832 / Noise: 4785 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1107 ms
Raw HTML Size21.9 KB
Visible Text Size3.2 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1107 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

263
DOM nodes
22 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0, post-check=0, pre-check=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

65/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

46
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → nl
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 50/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mijnwoordenboek.nl
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mijnwoordenboek.nl" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mijnwoordenboek.nl" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
50
Single-page score
-3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
47
Avg across 10 pages · Range 47–47
Total Words
620
Avg Bloat
72.5×
Ext. Citations
6
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/pricing
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
pricing 47 72.5× 62
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/about
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
about 47 72.5× 62
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/features
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
product 47 72.5× 62
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/products
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
product 47 72.5× 62
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/docs
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
docs 47 72.5× 62
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/blog
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
blog 47 72.5× 62
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/case-studies
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
social-proof 47 72.5× 62
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/contact
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
support 47 72.5× 62
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/integrations
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
integrations 47 72.5× 62
https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/faq
Mijnwoordenboek | Vertalen
support 47 72.5× 62
🔗
Outbound External Citations
6 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
encyclo.co.uk ×10
enzyklo.de ×10
woorden.org ×10
encyclo.nl ×10
encyclopedie.fr ×10
crosswordclues.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mijnwoordenboek.nl

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mijnwoordenboek.nl. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mijnwoordenboek.nl (this site) 50 74 Custom / Proprietary 6.8× 1
gto.ru 50 71 Custom / Proprietary 6.8× 1 Compare →
outletarredamento.it 50 66 Custom / Proprietary 6.9× 1 Compare →
ethplorer.io 50 66 Custom / Proprietary 6.9× 1 Compare →
sonalotfi.com 50 71 Custom / Proprietary 6.9× 1 Compare →
seputarforex.org 50 15 Custom / Proprietary 6.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mijnwoordenboek.nl. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Mijnwoordenboek",
  "url": "https://mijnwoordenboek.nl",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://mijnwoordenboek.nl/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mijnwoordenboek.nl:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
81
Improvement
+7 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history