mas40.com 56 D
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 56 ⚡ Perf 56 🏗️ Arch 65

mas40.com — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

mas40.com
📊

mas40.com achieves a 71/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the infrastructure sector, mas40.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. The bloated 38.8× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (50) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (39×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than mas40.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)56 × 0.40 = 22.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)56 × 0.20 = 11.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)65 × 0.15 = 9.8
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 22.4 + 11.2 + 9.8
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
70
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 19%
Rank #188604
+12 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

mas40.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mas40.com ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat38.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

53 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

143 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → es
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

56/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
mas40.com
48
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 38.8x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 70/100 — Good
Structured Elements 96 elements (90 lists, 6 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words659
Raw Density14.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (7.9 KB)Bloat (297.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio38.8× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context69% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage9 / 13 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 305.1 KB, but only 7.9 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (38.8×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.4% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 2013 / Noise: 76101 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of mas40.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
QueContactos.com is a dating site designed to connect single men and women in Mexico, facilitating friendships, romantic relationships, and long-term
Target Audience
Singles aged 40 and over, both men and women, seeking romantic relationships, friendships, or casual dating in Mexico.
Pricing Model
Free to register and browse profiles; additional features or premium services may be available (details not specified).
🏆 Competitive Moat
Focus on the Mexican dating market and a large user base, combined with a claim of being a ‘serious and reliable’ dating site.
📊 Content Depth
4/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Reliance on user-generated content and testimonials
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-09

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
ServerMicrosoft-IIS/10.0
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1332 ms
Raw HTML Size305.1 KB
Visible Text Size7.9 KB

Performance & Speed

56/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1332 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

434
DOM nodes
305 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googlesyndication.comgoogletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

65/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

77
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → es
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 48/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mas40.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mas40.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mas40.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
48
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 10 pages · Range 43–53
Topical Cohesion
2%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
6318
Avg Bloat
113.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://mas40.com/pricing
Pricing gratis, solteros de Pricing - Mas40
pricing 53 79.5× 773 💰 Pricing
https://mas40.com/about
About gratis, solteros de About - Mas40
pricing 53 79.5× 773 💰 Pricing
https://mas40.com/features
Features gratis, solteros de Features - Mas40
pricing 53 79.5× 773 💰 Pricing
https://mas40.com/products
Products gratis, solteros de Products - Mas40
pricing 53 79.5× 773 💰 Pricing
https://mas40.com/case-studies
Case studies gratis, solteros de Case studies - Mas40
pricing 53 79.1× 777 💰 Pricing
https://mas40.com/contact
Contact gratis, solteros de Contact - Mas40
pricing 53 79.5× 773 💰 Pricing
https://mas40.com/integrations
Integrations gratis, solteros de Integrations - Mas40
pricing 53 79.5× 773 💰 Pricing
https://mas40.com/blog
Blog gratis, solteros de Blog - Mas40
pricing 43 193.8× 301 💰 Pricing
https://mas40.com/docs
Docs gratis, solteros de Docs - Mas40
pricing 43 193.8× 301 💰 Pricing
https://mas40.com/faq
Faq gratis, solteros de Faq - Mas40
pricing 43 193.8× 301 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/features/ 1 53 1% 79.5× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 53 1% 79.5× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 53 1% 79.5× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 53 1% 79.5× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 53 1% 79.1× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 53 1% 79.5× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 43 1% 193.8× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 43 1% 193.8× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 53 1% 79.5× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 43 1% 193.8× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
itunes.apple.com ×10
play.google.com ×10
adanel.com ×7
lcontactos.com ×7
amoresporadico.com ×7
quimicacristiana.com ×7
quecontactos.com ×7
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mas40.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mas40.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mas40.com (this site) 48 71 Express 38.8× 0
premier.twitcasting.tv 73 80 Express 3.0× 0 Compare →
kaika.com.au 73 80 Express 5.1× 0 Compare →
charleskeith.co.uk 73 85 Express 7.8× 1 Compare →
farmaciadarrabida.pt 73 82 Express 3.5× 3 Compare →
pratiche.it 73 78 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite mas40.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mas40.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Mas40",
  "url": "https://mas40.com",
  "logo": "https://mas40.com/logo.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Mas40",
  "url": "https://mas40.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://mas40.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Mas40?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Mas40 does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Mas40 work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Mas40."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mas40.com:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →