makecode.com 57 D
🛡️ SEO 41 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 52

makecode.com — Global SEODiff Score 57/100

makecode.com
📊

With a solid 75/100 ACRI, makecode.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 81% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, makecode.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. With a 4.3× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

57
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (34) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than makecode.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)41 × 0.25 = 10.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)52 × 0.15 = 7.8
Weighted sum = 10.2 + 32.4 + 6.8 + 7.8
Global SEODiff Score = 57 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
74
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #48563
+15 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

makecode.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why makecode.com ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat4.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

41/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

18 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

161 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.microsoft.com/en-ca/makecode
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-CA
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Microsoft MakeCode
  • ✓ og:description — MakeCode brings computer science to life for all students with fun projects, immediate results, and both block and text editors for learners at different levels.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
makecode.com
60
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 74/100 — Good
Structured Elements 119 elements (119 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words730
Raw Density16.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

67
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability67/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

23%
🗑️ 77%
Useful Content (40.3 KB)Bloat (134.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.3× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context13% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage3 / 23 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 13% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

17 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 76.9% · SNR: 0.30 · Signal: 10315 / Noise: 34362 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of makecode.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
MakeCode is a framework for creating interactive programming experiences, particularly for beginners, using a block-based programming model that translates to
Target Audience
Beginner programmers, educators, hobbyists, and makers interested in introducing programming concepts in a visual and accessible way.
Pricing Model
Open source and free to use. Commercial support and advanced features may be available through Microsoft services.
🔗 Integration Partners
GitHubPXT
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensibility through PXT and a block-based interface, combined with a strong focus on hardware integration and a supportive community.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template of this page on GitHubEdit template of this page on GitHub
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited documentation for advanced features
• Potential complexity for users transitioning from block-based to text-based coding
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2288 ms
Raw HTML Size174.5 KB
Visible Text Size40.3 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2288 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

828
DOM nodes
174 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

52/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

2
internal links
124
external links
Limited internal links — consider adding contextual cross-links

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-CA
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 60/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for makecode.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/makecode.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=makecode.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 21 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
60
Single-page score
-45
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
16
Avg across 21 pages · Range 0–82
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 60, but internal pages average only 16 — a -45-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
6892
Avg Bloat
3.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://makecode.com/blog
Microsoft MakeCode Blog
pricing 82 4.1× 3825 💰 Pricing
https://makecode.com/about
About
about 77 7.9× 976
https://makecode.com/get-started
Get started – Microsoft MakeCode
conversion 67 28.6× 1385
https://makecode.com/contact
Hello, we’re excited to hear from you!
support 54 15.0× 434
https://makecode.com/docs
MakeCode (PXT) Documentation
docs 49 24.2× 272
https://makecode.com/api docs 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/guides blog 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/resources blog 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/help support 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/solutions product 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/demo conversion 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/support support 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/security trust 0 0.0× 0
https://makecode.com/trust trust 0 0.0× 0
Showing 20 of 21 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/get-started/ 1 67 0% 28.6× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/help/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/security/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/demo/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 82 0% 4.2× Healthy
/solutions/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/trust/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/careers/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 77 0% 7.9× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 54 0% 15.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 21 pages
youtube.com ×5
twitter.com ×5
github.com ×5
microsoft.com ×3
makecode.microbit.org ×2
aka.ms ×2
adafruit.com ×2
makecode.mindstorms.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/makecode.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to makecode.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
makecode.com (this site) 60 75 Express 4.3× 0
edicionesgesicap.com 85 86 Express 4.2× 4 Compare →
corso101.com 85 87 Express 1.8× 3 Compare →
electricpoint.com 85 87 Express 3.1× 4 Compare →
armarinhosaojose.com.br 85 87 Express 6.2× 4 Compare →
onepiece-rental.net 85 87 Express 2.2× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite makecode.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to makecode.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Makecode",
  "url": "https://makecode.com",
  "logo": "https://makecode.com/favicon.ico?v2",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Makecode",
  "url": "https://makecode.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://makecode.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Makecode?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Makecode does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Makecode work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Makecode."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for makecode.com:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
91
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →