mailchimp.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 48 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 92

mailchimp.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

mailchimp.com
📊

mailchimp.com achieves a 79/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), mailchimp.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Token bloat registers at 6.3× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than mailchimp.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)48 × 0.25 = 12.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)92 × 0.15 = 13.8
Weighted sum = 12.0 + 32.8 + 7.8 + 13.8
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
59
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
65
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #695
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

mailchimp.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mailchimp.com ranks here

Tech stackAdobe Experience Manager
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat6.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

48/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

42 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

126 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://mailchimp.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Email & SMS Marketing Platform | Mailchimp
  • ✓ og:description — Utilize real-time user behavior data and artificial intelligence to convert more customers. Easy to use, get started for free!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
mailchimp.com
62
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 59/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 287 elements (287 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2715
Raw Density10.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

68
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability68/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

15%
🗑️ 85%
Useful Content (71.2 KB)Bloat (378.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.3× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context95% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage95 / 100 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 84.2% · SNR: 0.19 · Signal: 18230 / Noise: 96927 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of mailchimp.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Email marketing and automation platform
Target Audience
Small to medium businesses, nonprofits, and charities
Pricing Model
Monthly subscription with free trials and discounts
🔗 Integration Partners
Mailchimp Integrations
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC2
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-25 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score65/100
Serveristio-envoy
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1288 ms
Raw HTML Size449.8 KB
Visible Text Size71.2 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1288 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2171
DOM nodes
450 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
optimizely.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

92/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://mailchimp.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

274
internal links
22
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 62/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mailchimp.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mailchimp.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mailchimp.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
62
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 1 pages · Range 64–64
Total Words
4049
Avg Bloat
28.7×
RAG Fractures
1
Ext. Citations
15
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://mailchimp.com/pricing
Mailchimp Pricing Plans | Get Started Today | Mailchimp
pricing 64 28.7× 4049 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
🔗
Outbound External Citations
15 unique external domains cited across 1 pages
instagram.com ×1
status.mailchimp.com ×1
creditkarma.com ×1
youtube.com ×1
login.mailchimp.com ×1
mailchi.mp ×1
intuit.com ×1
x.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mailchimp.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mailchimp.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mailchimp.com (this site) 62 79 Adobe Experience Manager 6.3× 1
mailchimpapp.com 62 79 Adobe Experience Manager 6.3× 1 Compare →
mailchimpapp.net 63 79 Adobe Experience Manager 6.4× 1 Compare →
eep.io 63 79 Adobe Experience Manager 6.4× 1 Compare →
inmarsat.com 61 78 Adobe Experience Manager 6.4× 1 Compare →
pearsonclinical.co.uk 62 76 Adobe Experience Manager 5.7× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mailchimp.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Mailchimp",
  "url": "https://mailchimp.com",
  "logo": "https://mailchimp.com/release/plums/3a3e92cfc284c7bc.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Mailchimp",
  "url": "https://mailchimp.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://mailchimp.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Mailchimp?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Mailchimp does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Mailchimp work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Mailchimp."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mailchimp.com:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

4.2
AI-Trust
#871
Global Rank
51%
Percentile
26
Inbound AI Links
14
Outbound AI Links
53
Avg Inbound ACRI
4%
Invisible Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
mailchi.mp 51 19.0 ← cites you
spa-francorchamps.be 66 0.0 ← cites you
mandrill.com 63 0.0 ← cites you
cognac-expert.com 63 0.0 ← cites you
eep.io 63 0.0 ← cites you
friulioggi.it 61 0.0 ← cites you
smerconish.com 61 0.0 ← cites you
vilaweb.cat 59 0.0 ← cites you
desertmuseum.org 57 0.0 ← cites you
rewind.io 57 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →