loyalzoo.com 62 C
🛡️ SEO 80 🤖 GEO 65 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 64

loyalzoo.com — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

loyalzoo.com
📊

With a solid 76/100 ACRI, loyalzoo.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 84% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), loyalzoo.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 25.3× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (25×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than loyalzoo.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)80 × 0.25 = 20.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)65 × 0.40 = 26.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)64 × 0.15 = 9.6
Weighted sum = 20.0 + 26.0 + 6.8 + 9.6
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
31
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 31%
Rank #309158
-14 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 16%
Score 76/100

loyalzoo.com is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why loyalzoo.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat25.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

80/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

56 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

140 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://loyalzoo.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Loyalty, Marketing and Subscriptions for Small Businesses
  • ✓ og:description — Join the thousands of SMBs in over 50 countries using Loyalzoo to drive repeat business and engage their customers.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

65/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
loyalzoo.com
56
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 31/100 — Low
Structured Elements 45 elements (42 lists, 3 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1607
Raw Density2.8%
💡Low structure score (31/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 42 list items, 3 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

49
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability49/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (95/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (35.9 KB)Bloat (871.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio25.3× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context6% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage3 / 52 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 907.6 KB, but only 35.9 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (25.3×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 6% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.0% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 9182 / Noise: 223172 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1085 ms
Raw HTML Size907.6 KB
Visible Text Size35.9 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1085 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1529
DOM nodes
908 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=300, s-maxage=604800
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

64/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

70
internal links
17
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for loyalzoo.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/loyalzoo.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=loyalzoo.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 7 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
56
Single-page score
-6
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 7 pages · Range 40–60
Topical Cohesion
12%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
2670
Avg Bloat
614.1×
Ext. Citations
11
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://loyalzoo.com/faq
FAQ - Loyalzoo
pricing 60 153.8× 1023 💰 Pricing
https://loyalzoo.com/pricing
Pricing - Loyalzoo
pricing 50 408.5× 399 💰 Pricing
https://loyalzoo.com/about
Why Loyalzoo - Loyalzoo
pricing 50 575.1× 264 💰 Pricing
https://loyalzoo.com/blog
Blog - Loyalzoo
pricing 50 536.0× 288 💰 Pricing
https://loyalzoo.com/case-studies
Case Studies - Loyalzoo
pricing 50 424.7× 368 💰 Pricing
https://loyalzoo.com/integrations
Integrations - Loyalzoo
pricing 50 679.1× 229 💰 Pricing
https://loyalzoo.com/contact
Contact - Loyalzoo
pricing 40 1521.1× 99 💰 Pricing
🔗
Outbound External Citations
11 unique external domains cited across 7 pages
uk.linkedin.com ×7
weinteract.co.uk ×7
youtube.com ×7
help.loyalzoo.com ×7
admin.loyalty-app.co ×7
x.com ×7
facebook.com ×7
getapp.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/loyalzoo.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to loyalzoo.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
loyalzoo.com (this site) 56 76 WordPress 25.3× 2
3dissue.com 56 79 WordPress 25.3× 2 Compare →
3dissue.net 56 79 WordPress 25.3× 2 Compare →
net1.ie 56 81 WordPress 25.0× 2 Compare →
earthfare.com 56 77 WordPress 25.0× 2 Compare →
linksgram.org 56 75 WordPress 24.8× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to loyalzoo.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for loyalzoo.com:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
81
Improvement
+5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history