listafirme.ro 75 B
🛡️ SEO 79 🤖 GEO 86 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 70

listafirme.ro — Global SEODiff Score 75/100

listafirme.ro
📊

listafirme.ro achieves a 71/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), listafirme.ro performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A tight 4.3× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. The presence of 4 structured data blocks ensures search engines and AI agents can accurately classify and extract entities from the page. Some AI crawlers are permitted while others are blocked — a mixed robots.txt policy that limits visibility in certain AI ecosystems.

75
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (53) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than listafirme.ro?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)79 × 0.25 = 19.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)86 × 0.40 = 34.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)70 × 0.15 = 10.5
Weighted sum = 19.8 + 34.4 + 10.6 + 10.5
Global SEODiff Score = 75 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
49
Structure
avg 35
48
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #54745
+24 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 29%
Score 71/100

listafirme.ro punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why listafirme.ro ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat4.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

79/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

68 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

168 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 15
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://listafirme.ro/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ro
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Cautã informații verificate în baza de date cu firme din România
  • ✓ og:description — Caută firme din România după nume, CUI, CAEN, județ și multe alte criterii. Date oficiale (ANAF, ONRC, BPI), monitorizare insolvențe, rapoarte, export Excel, API.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

86/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
listafirme.ro
70
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 49/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 90 elements (90 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1227
Raw Density7.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

71
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability71/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

23%
🗑️ 77%
Useful Content (25.1 KB)Bloat (82.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.3× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage21 / 21 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

17 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 76.7% · SNR: 0.30 · Signal: 6424 / Noise: 21127 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerMicrosoft-IIS/10.0
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1517 ms
Raw HTML Size107.6 KB
Visible Text Size25.1 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1517 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

972
DOM nodes
108 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

70/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

117
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ro
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 70/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for listafirme.ro
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/listafirme.ro" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=listafirme.ro" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 8 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
70
Single-page score
-1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
69
Avg across 8 pages · Range 47–85
Topical Cohesion
8%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
6304
Avg Bloat
24.1×
Ext. Citations
13
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://listafirme.ro/faq
Întrebări Frecvente
pricing 85 8.7× 1084 💰 Pricing
https://listafirme.ro/about
Istoria firmei
about 75 10.1× 820
https://listafirme.ro/pricing
ATIPIC TRANSFER PRICING SOLUTIONS SRL din BUCURESTI (CUI 37187430) – date firmă, contact, bilanț, CAEN
pricing 72 17.9× 1062 💰 Pricing
https://listafirme.ro/products
SAINT GOBAIN CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS ROMANIA SRL din BUCURESTI (CUI 6194577) – date firmă, contact, bilanț, CAEN
pricing 72 19.5× 1101 💰 Pricing
https://listafirme.ro/features
FEATURES SRL din DOLJ (CUI 28322570) – date firmă, contact, bilanț, CAEN
pricing 67 22.2× 849 💰 Pricing
https://listafirme.ro/blog
BLOG INDCOM SRL din BUCURESTI (CUI 4097780) – date firmă, contact, bilanț, CAEN
pricing 67 27.3× 584 💰 Pricing
https://listafirme.ro/integrations
DONKEY INTEGRATIONS SRL din BUCURESTI (CUI 50319007) – date firmă, contact, bilanț, CAEN
pricing 67 26.6× 653 💰 Pricing
https://listafirme.ro/contact
Contact suport tehnic ListaFirme
support 47 60.6× 151
🔗
Outbound External Citations
13 unique external domains cited across 8 pages
instagram.com ×8
youtube.com ×8
jobs.borgdesign.ro ×8
facebook.com ×8
linkedin.com ×8
platform.listafirme.ro ×6
wa.me ×3
portal.just.ro ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/listafirme.ro

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to listafirme.ro. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
listafirme.ro (this site) 70 71 Custom / Proprietary 4.3× 4
lhebdo17.fr 70 77 Custom / Proprietary 4.0× 4 Compare →
purchasing3sixty.com 70 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.8× 4 Compare →
africaradio.com 69 76 Custom / Proprietary 4.3× 4 Compare →
canaanresort.com 70 76 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 4 Compare →
hautanjou.fr 70 77 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for listafirme.ro:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
74
Improvement
+3 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history