keibalab.jp 63 C
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 70

keibalab.jp — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

keibalab.jp
📊

With an ACRI of 85/100, keibalab.jp stands out as one of the highest-performing sites in AI search visibility, outranking 98% of its peers. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places keibalab.jp above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 15% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. The 7.6× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (46) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than keibalab.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)70 × 0.15 = 10.5
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 30.0 + 10.6 + 10.5
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.9%
Rank #9442
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 85/100

keibalab.jp has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why keibalab.jp ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat7.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

81 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

439 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.keibalab.jp
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 予想に役立つ競馬情報が全て揃うポータルサイト!競馬ラボ
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
keibalab.jp
60
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 142 elements (142 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words261
Raw Density54.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

77
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability77/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (9.4 KB)Bloat (61.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.6× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context24% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage14 / 58 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 24% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.8% · SNR: 0.15 · Signal: 2398 / Noise: 15827 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of keibalab.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This site provides comprehensive, free horse racing information for better predictions.
Target Audience
Horse racing enthusiasts, bettors, and those seeking horse racing predictions.
Pricing Model
Free access to all horse racing information.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive horse racing data and expert predictions.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1057 ms
Raw HTML Size71.2 KB
Visible Text Size9.4 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1057 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

907
DOM nodes
71 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comdoubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

70/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.keibalab.jp/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

164
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 60/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for keibalab.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/keibalab.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=keibalab.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 141 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
60
Single-page score
-4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
57
Avg across 141 pages · Range 52–80
Total Words
25540
Avg Bloat
80.7×
RAG Fractures [?]
3
⚠️
3 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 3 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.keibalab.jp/db/race/grade.html
重賞レースまとめページ | 競馬ラボ
pricing 80 17.4× 1177 💰 Pricing
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45975/
この悔しさを糧に…!相棒スリールミニョンと挑んだ阪急杯をプレイバック【永島まなみ騎手コラム】 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 75 39.5× 530
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45950/
相棒・スリールミニョンと阪急杯へ!距離短縮で一発を狙う【永島まなみ騎手コラム】 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 75 42.3× 502
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45929/
雪ニモマケズ!激動の週末のウラ側とまなみトーーク第5弾始動!【永島まなみ騎手コラム】 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 75 43.0× 516
https://www.keibalab.jp/column/
競馬関係者コラム【トレセンLIVE】 | 競馬ラボ
other 65 62.7× 227
https://www.keibalab.jp/column/keita_weekly/
オーシャンSのレイピア、中山記念のレーベンスティールともに久々のコンビ! | 週刊!戸崎圭太 | 競馬ラボ
other 65 55.7× 263
https://www.keibalab.jp/column/manami/
この悔しさを糧に…!相棒スリールミニョンと挑んだ阪急杯をプレイバック | まなみの学び | 競馬ラボ
other 65 36.3× 498
https://www.keibalab.jp/column/specialtalk/
Special Talk一覧 | 競馬ラボ
other 65 51.3× 206
https://www.keibalab.jp/db/race/
2026年3月1日のレース一覧 | 競馬ラボ
pricing 65 33.9× 308 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.keibalab.jp/column/focus/711/
【共同通信杯・京都記念】素質馬揃った注目の3歳重賞&実力古馬集結の一戦を馬体診断! | 馬体FOCUS | 競馬ラボ
pricing 65 58.3× 371 💰 Pricing
https://www.keibalab.jp/column/focus/710/
【東京新聞杯・きさらぎ賞】春のG1を見据える一戦&クラシックの登竜門を馬体診断 | 馬体FOCUS | 競馬ラボ
pricing 65 59.9× 332 💰 Pricing
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45978/
【中山記念】過去の好走パターンと完全一致!若さと勢いに乗る該当馬に連続好走チャンス到来 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 65 64.2× 212
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45976/
オーシャンSのレイピア、中山記念のレーベンスティールともに久々のコンビ!【戸崎圭太コラム】 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 65 58.0× 268
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45952/
フェブラリーSはシックスペンスに初騎乗!引退目前の国枝調教師への恩返し目指す!【戸崎圭太コラム】 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 65 65.2× 238
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45934/
【クイーンC】無敗の東京マイルで能力証明!良血馬ドリームコアが重賞初制覇! | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 65 69.7× 202
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45912/
東京新聞杯はウンブライルとのコンビ!次週はサウジ遠征へ!【戸崎圭太コラム】 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 65 64.3× 225
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45911/
小倉の調整ルームはとにかく○○!滞在競馬のメリット&デメリット【永島まなみ騎手コラム】 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 65 57.8× 308
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45905/
【根岸S】惜敗に別れを告げる快勝!ロードフォンスが重賞2勝目! | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 65 69.2× 203
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45896/
根岸Sはウェイワードアクトが重賞初挑戦へ!【戸崎圭太コラム】 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 65 70.8× 201
https://www.keibalab.jp/topics/45895/
雪の栗東トレセン!滋賀の中心で○を叫ぶ!?【永島まなみ騎手コラム】 | 競馬ニュース | 競馬ラボ
other 65 54.8× 337
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/topics/ 102 56 0% 78.6× High JS Bloat
/column/ 22 58 0% 81.3× High JS Bloat
/yosou/ 8 53 0% 117.0× High JS Bloat
/info/ 5 55 0% 86.8× High JS Bloat
/db/ 4 65 0% 49.9× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/keibalab.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to keibalab.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
keibalab.jp (this site) 60 85 Custom / Proprietary 7.6× 1
haoshunjia.com 85 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.3× 1 Compare →
scout-tactical.com.ua 85 87 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 3 Compare →
gurapan.jp 85 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.5× 2 Compare →
qtponline.com 85 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.3× 2 Compare →
kondela.si 85 92 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite keibalab.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to keibalab.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Keibalab",
  "url": "https://keibalab.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://keibalab.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Keibalab?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Keibalab does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Keibalab work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Keibalab."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for keibalab.jp:

Current Score
85
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history