jornaya.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 65 🤖 GEO 69 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 71

jornaya.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

jornaya.com
📊

With a solid 82/100 ACRI, jornaya.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 96% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, jornaya.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Heavy markup overhead (20.4× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (59) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (20×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than jornaya.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)65 × 0.25 = 16.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)69 × 0.40 = 27.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)71 × 0.15 = 10.7
Weighted sum = 16.2 + 27.6 + 11.8 + 10.7
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
61
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 41%
Rank #411308
-37 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

jornaya.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 41%) than in AI search (Top 4%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why jornaya.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat20.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

65/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

72 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

123 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://infutor.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
  • ✓ og:description — Acquire, Retain and Cross Sell with confidence. Leverage real-time consumer insights to personalize marketing interactions.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

69/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
jornaya.com
65
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 61/100 — Good
Structured Elements 111 elements (111 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words984
Raw Density11.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (9.8 KB)Bloat (190.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio20.4× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context90% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage18 / 20 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 200.4 KB, but only 9.8 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (20.4×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.1% · SNR: 0.05 · Signal: 2517 / Noise: 48773 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of jornaya.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Verisk Marketing Solutions helps marketers and platform partners gain a comprehensive, one-of-a-kind view of US consumers and households by merging
Target Audience
Marketing managers, CMOs, data analysts, lead generation specialists, platform partners, insurance carriers, mortgage lenders, banks, credit unions, and higher education institutions.
Pricing Model
Data licensing and syndication – custom pricing based on data sets and usage.
🔗 Integration Partners
InfutorActiveProspect
🛡️ Compliance Standards
TCPAHIPAA
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique, comprehensive identity graph combining Infutor and Jornaya data, providing a more accurate and complete view of US consumers than competitors.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesBlog posts on topics like ‘Household-Level IP Resolution’ and ‘CES 2026: Innovation Without the Buzzwords’
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of a complete consumer identity view
• Difficulty in reaching the right consumers with the right message
• Challenges in ensuring TCPA compliance
• Need for accurate data to personalize marketing experiences
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-19

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time909 ms
Raw HTML Size200.4 KB
Visible Text Size9.8 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

909 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1032
DOM nodes
200 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0, no-store, private
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

71/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

35
internal links
66
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 65/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for jornaya.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/jornaya.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=jornaya.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 9 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
65
Single-page score
-1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 9 pages · Range 64–64
Total Words
7479
Avg Bloat
49.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://jornaya.com/pricing
Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
pricing 64 49.1× 831
https://jornaya.com/about
Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
about 64 49.1× 831
https://jornaya.com/products
Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
product 64 49.1× 831
https://jornaya.com/features
Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
product 64 49.1× 831
https://jornaya.com/blog
Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
blog 64 49.1× 831
https://jornaya.com/docs
Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
docs 64 49.1× 831
https://jornaya.com/case-studies
Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
social-proof 64 49.1× 831
https://jornaya.com/faq
Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
support 64 49.1× 831
https://jornaya.com/contact
Consumer Insights — Identity, Behavior, Inbound Leads, TCPA Protection
support 64 49.1× 831
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 64 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 64 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 64 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 64 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 64 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 64 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 9 pages
sos.state.tx.us ×9
youtube.com ×9
infutor.com ×9
privacy.infutor.com ×9
twitter.com ×9
marketing.verisk.com ×9
facebook.com ×9
linkedin.com ×9
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/jornaya.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to jornaya.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
jornaya.com (this site) 65 82 WordPress 20.4× 1
grupocasalima.com 87 96 WordPress 11.4× 5 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite jornaya.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to jornaya.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Jornaya?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Jornaya does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Jornaya work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Jornaya."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for jornaya.com:

Current Score
82
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →