jebsen.com 62 C
🛡️ SEO 48 🤖 GEO 69 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 67

jebsen.com — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

jebsen.com
📊

jebsen.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 82/100, outperforming 96% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, jebsen.com outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The 6.0× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (48) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
⚠️ Crawl Blocked: Fetch failed (network timeout / connection error)
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Feb 24 Feb 25
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than jebsen.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)48 × 0.25 = 12.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)69 × 0.40 = 27.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)67 × 0.15 = 10.0
Weighted sum = 12.0 + 27.6 + 12.4 + 10.0
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
61
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #597161
-55 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

jebsen.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 4%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why jebsen.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat6.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…

⚠️ Crawl Failed: Anti-Bot Protection Detected

Fetch failed (network timeout / connection error)

The scores below may not reflect actual site quality. The crawler received a challenge page instead of real content.

🛡️

Traditional SEO

48/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

13 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

141 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.jebsen.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Home
  • ✓ og:description — Jebsen partners with the world’s leading brands to deliver high-quality products, services and experiences that enhance consumers’ lives.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

69/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
jebsen.com
37
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 61/100 — Good
Structured Elements 99 elements (99 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words899
Raw Density11.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

70
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability70/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

16%
🗑️ 84%
Useful Content (16.4 KB)Bloat (81.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.0× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context25% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage2 / 8 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 25% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 83.3% · SNR: 0.20 · Signal: 4202 / Noise: 20890 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1969 ms
Raw HTML Size98.0 KB
Visible Text Size16.4 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1969 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

653
DOM nodes
98 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=3, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

67/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

95
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site is currently blocking AI crawlers. Unblock them and rescan to earn your AI-Verified badge.

AI-Verified badge for jebsen.com
Unverified — crawl access is blocked
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/jebsen.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=jebsen.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
37
Single-page score
+7
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
44
Avg across 10 pages · Range 44–44
Total Words
1930
Avg Bloat
87.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://jebsen.com/pricing
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
pricing 44 87.9× 193
https://jebsen.com/about
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
about 44 87.9× 193
https://jebsen.com/products
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
product 44 87.9× 193
https://jebsen.com/features
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
product 44 87.9× 193
https://jebsen.com/blog
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
blog 44 87.9× 193
https://jebsen.com/docs
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
docs 44 87.9× 193
https://jebsen.com/case-studies
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
social-proof 44 87.9× 193
https://jebsen.com/contact
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
support 44 87.9× 193
https://jebsen.com/integrations
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
integrations 44 87.9× 193
https://jebsen.com/faq
Page Doesn't Exist - Jebsen
support 44 87.9× 193
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 44 0% 88.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
wechat.com ×10
morus.jebsen.com ×10
linkedin.com ×10
weibo.com ×10
jobs.jebsen.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/jebsen.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to jebsen.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
jebsen.com (this site) 37 82 WordPress 6.0× 1
hostrago.com 62 73 WordPress 6.2× 1 Compare →
consejotransparencia.cl 62 82 WordPress 6.6× 1 Compare →
calamusareal.com 62 81 WordPress 4.7× 1 Compare →
buypremiumporn.com 62 73 WordPress 4.6× 1 Compare →
freelancers.getblend.com 62 80 WordPress 8.7× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to jebsen.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Jebsen?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Jebsen does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Jebsen work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Jebsen."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for jebsen.com:

Current Score
82
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history