inke.cn 42 D
🛡️ SEO 32 🤖 GEO 26 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 53

inke.cn — Global SEODiff Score 42/100

inke.cn
📊

At 71/100, the ACRI for inke.cn indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), inke.cn performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 50% signals a rendering gap: a significant portion of page content requires JavaScript execution to become visible. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

42
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — AI Readiness (26) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (53×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 27, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 27
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than inke.cn?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)32 × 0.25 = 8.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)26 × 0.40 = 10.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)53 × 0.15 = 7.9
Weighted sum = 8.0 + 10.4 + 16.0 + 7.9
Global SEODiff Score = 42 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
65
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 24%
Rank #242297
+6 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

inke.cn shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why inke.cn ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingCSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

32/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

50 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

195 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✗ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-CN
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

26/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
inke.cn
25
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 50% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 53.3x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 50%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Partially JS-Dependent
Rendering Type CSR
💡High ghost ratio means AI crawlers may miss content. Consider server-side rendering (SSR) or pre-rendering for critical pages.

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 8 elements (8 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words24
Raw Density33.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

48
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability48/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (25/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (344 B)Bloat (17.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context20% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage1 / 5 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 17.9 KB, but only 344 B is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 20% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.1% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 86 / Noise: 4500 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serveropenresty/1.11.2.4
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time974 ms
Raw HTML Size17.9 KB
Visible Text Size344 B

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

974 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

121
DOM nodes
18 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

53/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

10
internal links
0
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-CN
  • ✗ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 25/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for inke.cn
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/inke.cn" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=inke.cn" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
25
Single-page score
-3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
22
Avg across 10 pages · Range 22–23
Total Words
228
Avg Bloat
162.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://inke.cn/products
映客-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客
product 23 248.2× 12
https://inke.cn/pricing
映客直播-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客APP
pricing 22 152.9× 24
https://inke.cn/about
映客直播-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客APP
about 22 152.9× 24
https://inke.cn/features
映客直播-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客APP
product 22 152.9× 24
https://inke.cn/blog
映客直播-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客APP
blog 22 152.9× 24
https://inke.cn/docs
映客直播-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客APP
docs 22 152.9× 24
https://inke.cn/case-studies
映客直播-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客APP
social-proof 22 152.9× 24
https://inke.cn/integrations
映客直播-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客APP
integrations 22 152.9× 24
https://inke.cn/contact
映客直播-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客APP
support 22 152.9× 24
https://inke.cn/faq
映客直播-看直播,玩直播,尽在映客APP
support 22 152.9× 24
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 23 1% 248.2× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 22 1% 152.9× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 22 1% 152.9× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 22 1% 152.9× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 22 1% 152.9× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 22 1% 152.9× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 22 1% 152.9× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 22 1% 152.9× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 22 1% 152.9× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 22 1% 152.9× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
pay.busi.inke.cn ×9
localhost:6001 ×1
itunes.apple.com ×1
app.inke.cn ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/inke.cn

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to inke.cn. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
inke.cn (this site) 25 71 Custom / Proprietary 53.3× 0
compraensanjuan.com 50 67 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 0 Compare →
status.racknerd.com 50 66 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 0 Compare →
ashitano.tonarinoyj.jp 50 71 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 0 Compare →
piev.kr 50 73 Custom / Proprietary 15.2× 0 Compare →
kodeli.com.tr 50 72 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite inke.cn when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to inke.cn. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Inke",
  "url": "https://inke.cn",
  "logo": "https://static.inke.cn/s/images/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Inke",
  "url": "https://inke.cn",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://inke.cn/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Fix Client-Side Rendering
High Impact ⏱ 2–4 hrs
50% of your content is behind client-side JavaScript and may not be accessible to AI crawlers. Wrap critical content in server-rendered HTML using your framework.
html
<!-- Ensure main content is in the initial HTML response -->
<main id="content">
  <!-- Server-rendered content goes here -->
  <h1>Inke</h1>
  <p>Your key content should render without JavaScript.</p>
  <!-- Move <script> tags to the bottom of <body> -->
</main>

<!-- In your framework config, enable SSR/prerendering: -->
<!-- your framework -->
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for inke.cn:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
96
Improvement
+25 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Fix client-side rendering +10 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history