hotelkeyapp.com 54 D
🛡️ SEO 47 🤖 GEO 48 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 86

hotelkeyapp.com — Global SEODiff Score 54/100

hotelkeyapp.com
📊

At 61/100, hotelkeyapp.com falls in the moderate bracket of AI-Readiness, suggesting its content is partially accessible to AI systems but not fully optimized. Compared to other saas sites (avg score: 57), hotelkeyapp.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains invisible to static crawlers. The 6.2× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

54
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (47) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than hotelkeyapp.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)47 × 0.25 = 11.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)48 × 0.40 = 19.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)86 × 0.15 = 12.9
Weighted sum = 11.8 + 19.2 + 10.6 + 12.9
Global SEODiff Score = 54 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
24
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 10
55
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.9%
Rank #9078
+49 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 49%
Score 61/100

hotelkeyapp.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why hotelkeyapp.com ranks here

Tech stackVue.js
Industrysaas
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat6.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

47/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

57 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

102 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 4
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 21
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.hotelkeyapp.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — HotelKey: Next Generation Hospitality Management Platform
  • ✓ og:description — All-in-one cloud-based system for your operations. Trusted by five enterprises and over 12,500 hotels.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

48/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the saas sector, gp-auto.com.ua (ACRI: 84) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
hotelkeyapp.com
41
Your ACRI Score
84
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. gp-auto.com.ua has schema coverage of 2 blocks and uses Cloudflare Pages. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is trapped in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content invisible to AI crawlers). Combined with 6.2x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 24/100 — Low
Structured Elements 35 elements (35 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2073
Raw Density1.7%
💡Low structure score (24/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 35 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

44
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability44/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

16%
🗑️ 84%
Useful Content (15.0 KB)Bloat (77.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.2× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage180 / 180 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 83.8% · SNR: 0.19 · Signal: 3830 / Noise: 19751 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkVue.js
AI-Readiness Score55/100
ServerAmazonS3
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1480 ms
Raw HTML Size92.1 KB
Visible Text Size15.0 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1480 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1015
DOM nodes
92 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

5
tracker scripts
3
third-party domains
40.4%
token overhead
Moderate trackers — consider lazy-loading non-essential scripts
facebook.netgoogletagmanager.comhotjar.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

86/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

55
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 41/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for hotelkeyapp.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/hotelkeyapp.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=hotelkeyapp.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar saas Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to hotelkeyapp.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
hotelkeyapp.com (this site) 41 61 Vue.js 6.2× 0
gmob.app 41 63 Vue.js 7.7× 0 Compare →
myucm.cloud 39 62 Vue.js 4.7× 0 Compare →
athkariapp.com 49 67 Vue.js 5.6× 0 Compare →
ajcloud.net 36 64 Vue.js 9.5× 0 Compare →
cloudsee.com 41 68 Vue.js 13.0× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to hotelkeyapp.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Hotelkeyapp",
  "url": "https://hotelkeyapp.com",
  "logo": "https://hotelkeyapp.com/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Hotelkeyapp",
  "url": "https://hotelkeyapp.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://hotelkeyapp.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Hotelkeyapp?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Hotelkeyapp does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Hotelkeyapp work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Hotelkeyapp."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for hotelkeyapp.com:

Current Score
61
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history