grafical.dk 73 B
🛡️ SEO 66 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 91

grafical.dk — Global SEODiff Score 73/100

grafical.dk
📊

grafical.dk shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 77/100, outperforming 86% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, grafical.dk outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 4.5×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

73
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than grafical.dk?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)66 × 0.25 = 16.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)91 × 0.15 = 13.7
Weighted sum = 16.5 + 34.8 + 7.8 + 13.7
Global SEODiff Score = 73 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
81
Structure
avg 35
4
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 37%
Rank #374527
-23 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

grafical.dk ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 37%) than in AI search (Top 14%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why grafical.dk ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat4.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

66/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

57 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

170 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.grafical.dk/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da-DK
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Kontorartikler » Online kontorforsyning med 60.000 varer
  • ✓ og:description — Køb kontorartikler til billige priser. 5 stjerner og +18.000 Trustpilot anmeldelser. Hurtig levering til København, Århus, Odense, Aalborg, Viborg, Vejle, Esbjerg m.v.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
grafical.dk
73
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 81/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 399 elements (399 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2047
Raw Density19.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

70
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability70/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

22%
🗑️ 78%
Useful Content (49.9 KB)Bloat (172.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context50% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage13 / 26 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

12 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 77.5% · SNR: 0.29 · Signal: 12773 / Noise: 44093 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerMicrosoft-IIS/10.0
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1366 ms
Raw HTML Size222.1 KB
Visible Text Size49.9 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1366 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1690
DOM nodes
222 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

91/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.grafical.dk/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

422
internal links
2
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da-DK
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 73/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for grafical.dk
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/grafical.dk" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=grafical.dk" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
73
Single-page score
+12
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
85
Avg across 1 pages · Range 85–85
Total Words
7128
Avg Bloat
6.8×
Ext. Citations
11
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://grafical.dk/faq
FAQ - Ofte stillede spørgsmål
support 85 6.8× 7128
🔗
Outbound External Citations
11 unique external domains cited across 1 pages
gls-group.eu ×1
nets.eu ×1
instagram.com ×1
dk.trustpilot.com ×1
docs.google.com ×1
enroll.3dsecure.no ×1
facebook.com ×1
linkedin.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/grafical.dk

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to grafical.dk. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
grafical.dk (this site) 73 77 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 2
frigidaire.ca 73 82 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 2 Compare →
paragonpurchasing.com 73 82 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 2 Compare →
omegabrand.com 73 83 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 2 Compare →
melius.club 73 81 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 2 Compare →
uhaul.com 73 83 Custom / Proprietary 4.7× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to grafical.dk. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Grafical",
  "url": "https://grafical.dk",
  "logo": "https://cdn.fotoagent.dk/accumolo/production/themes/grafical.dk_2020/favicons/apple-touch-icon-180x180.png?v=638647654713451720?v=",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for grafical.dk:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+9 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history