gmelius.com 80 A
🛡️ SEO 92 🤖 GEO 76 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 91

gmelius.com — Global SEODiff Score 80/100

gmelius.com
📊

gmelius.com achieves a 73/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the infrastructure sector, gmelius.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 15% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. The 8.6× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

80
A — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Excellent overall visibility. Traditional SEO (92) is your strongest pillar.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than gmelius.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)92 × 0.25 = 23.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)76 × 0.40 = 30.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)91 × 0.15 = 13.7
Weighted sum = 23.0 + 30.4 + 13.0 + 13.7
Global SEODiff Score = 80 (A)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
82
Schema
avg 10
75
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 25%
Rank #248703
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 24%
Score 73/100

gmelius.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gmelius.com ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat8.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

92/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

56 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

159 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://gmelius.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — AI Email Assistants & Shared Inboxes for Gmail | Gmelius
  • ✓ og:description — Our AI Assistants sort your emails and draft replies, while Gmelius shared inboxes help your team take over conversations so you don't have to. Start for free.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

76/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gmelius.com
49
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1752
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

6/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

56
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability56/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

11%
🗑️ 89%
Useful Content (11.3 KB)Bloat (86.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio8.6× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context78% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage62 / 79 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 88.4% · SNR: 0.13 · Signal: 2895 / Noise: 22010 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time936 ms
Raw HTML Size97.3 KB
Visible Text Size11.3 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

936 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

910
DOM nodes
97 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

91/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://gmelius.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

145
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 49/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gmelius.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gmelius.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gmelius.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 5 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
49
Single-page score
+16
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
65
Avg across 5 pages · Range 49–75
Topical Cohesion
13%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
4598
Avg Bloat
32.6×
RAG Fractures
1
Ext. Citations
18
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://gmelius.com/about
AI Email Assistants & Shared Inboxes for Gmail | Gmelius
pricing 75 14.7× 1356 💰 Pricing
https://gmelius.com/features
AI Email Assistants & Shared Inboxes for Gmail | Gmelius
pricing 75 14.7× 1356 💰 Pricing
https://gmelius.com/pricing
Pricing and Plans | 7-day Free Trial | Gmelius
pricing 67 37.6× 1147 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gmelius.com/integrations
Integrations and App Marketplace | Gmelius
pricing 59 25.7× 522 💰 Pricing
https://gmelius.com/blog
The Official Gmelius Blog
pricing 49 70.2× 217 💰 Pricing
🔗
Outbound External Citations
18 unique external domains cited across 5 pages
developers.gmelius.com ×5
updates.gmelius.com ×5
instagram.com ×5
app.gmelius.com ×5
workspace.google.com ×5
help.gmelius.com ×5
youtube.com ×5
backupspace.io ×5
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gmelius.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gmelius.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gmelius.com (this site) 49 73 Cloudflare Pages 8.6× 1
automobile-magazine.fr 49 15 Cloudflare Pages 8.7× 1 Compare →
cupoland.com.br 49 72 Cloudflare Pages 8.5× 1 Compare →
vrhump.com 49 68 Cloudflare Pages 8.5× 1 Compare →
widgetopia.io 49 81 Cloudflare Pages 8.8× 1 Compare →
ok.porn 49 71 Cloudflare Pages 8.4× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gmelius.com:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
76
Improvement
+3 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history