for.ge 67 C
🛡️ SEO 53 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 79

for.ge — Global SEODiff Score 67/100

for.ge
📊

With an ACRI of 91/100, for.ge stands out as one of the highest-performing sites in AI search visibility, outranking 99% of its peers. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places for.ge above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 7.2× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. The site includes 3 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

67
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than for.ge?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)53 × 0.25 = 13.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 13.2 + 34.8 + 6.8 + 11.8
Global SEODiff Score = 67 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
87
Structure
avg 35
86
Schema
avg 10
60
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #871918
-86 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 91/100

for.ge ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why for.ge ranks here

Tech stackMagento
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat7.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

53/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

75 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

183 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://for.ge/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
  • ✓ og:description — Slot Gacor merupakan situs slot online yang di yakini kemet membawa keuntungan besar dalam setiap permainan slot gacor hari ini dengan kalualitas gampang menang maxwin dalam 10 menit.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
for.ge
74
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 87/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 168 elements (168 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words746
Raw Density22.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

86
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability86/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (29.5 KB)Bloat (183.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.2× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context79% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage11 / 14 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.2% · SNR: 0.16 · Signal: 7550 / Noise: 47079 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkMagento
AI-Readiness Score60/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2505 ms
Raw HTML Size213.4 KB
Visible Text Size29.5 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2505 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

897
DOM nodes
213 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

7
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Moderate trackers — consider lazy-loading non-essential scripts
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://for.ge/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

166
internal links
57
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 74/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for for.ge
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/for.ge" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=for.ge" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
74
Single-page score
-5
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
69
Avg across 10 pages · Range 69–69
Total Words
5690
Avg Bloat
76.8×
Ext. Citations
11
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://for.ge/pricing
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
https://for.ge/about
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
https://for.ge/products
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
https://for.ge/features
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
https://for.ge/docs
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
https://for.ge/blog
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
https://for.ge/case-studies
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
https://for.ge/contact
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
https://for.ge/faq
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
https://for.ge/integrations
Slot Gacor: 10 Situs Slot Online Gacor Hari ini Terbaik Kualitas Maxwin100%
pricing 69 76.8× 569 💰 Pricing
🔗
Outbound External Citations
11 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
envato.com ×10
elements.envato.com ×10
build.envato.com ×10
project.yayasanbethel.org ×10
bcorporation.net ×10
s3.envato.com ×10
community.envato.com ×10
help.author.envato.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/for.ge

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to for.ge. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
for.ge (this site) 74 91 Magento 7.2× 3
carparts-onlineshop.com 73 81 Magento 6.3× 3 Compare →
terapad.com 73 81 Magento 6.1× 3 Compare →
fashionesta.com 74 85 Magento 7.0× 2 Compare →
creativepeople.es 74 91 Magento 5.3× 3 Compare →
drinkheadstand.com 74 87 Magento 4.9× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to for.ge. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "For",
  "url": "https://for.ge",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://for.ge/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is For?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what For does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does For work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with For."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for for.ge:

Current Score
91
Projected Score
100
Improvement
+9 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history