follow.it 62 C
🛡️ SEO 64 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 77

follow.it — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

follow.it
📊

follow.it shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 80/100, outperforming 94% of indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), follow.it performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (124×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than follow.it?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)64 × 0.25 = 16.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)77 × 0.15 = 11.5
Weighted sum = 16.0 + 24.8 + 9.4 + 11.5
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
57
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
80
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #13705
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

follow.it has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why follow.it ranks here

Tech stackNuxt.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

64/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

38 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

126 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://follow.it
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — The Ultimate News Platform
  • ✓ og:description — Never miss important news again, without information overload. As publisher, turn your news into revenue and increase traffic.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
follow.it
50
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 57/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 48 elements (48 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words496
Raw Density9.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

53
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability53/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (65/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (3.1 KB)Bloat (388.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context11% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage1 / 9 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 391.7 KB, but only 3.1 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 11% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.2% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 805 / Noise: 99474 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of follow.it and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
News distribution and reader engagement platform
Target Audience
News publishers and readers
Pricing Model
Not explicitly mentioned
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-25 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNuxt.js
AI-Readiness Score80/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1915 ms
Raw HTML Size391.7 KB
Visible Text Size3.1 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1915 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

805
DOM nodes
392 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googlesyndication.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

77/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://follow.it/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

40
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 50/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for follow.it
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/follow.it" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=follow.it" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 6 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
50
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
53
Avg across 6 pages · Range 41–72
Topical Cohesion
7%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
2352
Avg Bloat
203.5×
RAG Fractures
5
Ext. Citations
20
⚠️
5 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 5 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://follow.it/blog
follow.it Blog
blog 72 14.7× 671
https://follow.it/pricing
follow.it | Features and Pricing for Readers
pricing 51 205.6× 325 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://follow.it/about
follow.it | About us
pricing 51 90.9× 425 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://follow.it/products
products
pricing 51 261.3× 361 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://follow.it/faq
Faq
pricing 51 244.6× 396 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://follow.it/docs
follow.it | Documentation for publishers
pricing 41 404.0× 174 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
🔗
Outbound External Citations
20 unique external domains cited across 6 pages
twitter.com ×5
facebook.com ×5
sexkara.com ×1
luiza.info ×1
dixisex.com ×1
pornolou.com ×1
rosella.info ×1
inisev.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/follow.it

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to follow.it. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
follow.it (this site) 50 80 Nuxt.js 124.5× 1
specificfeeds.com 50 80 Nuxt.js 124.5× 1 Compare →
planetavto.ru 48 75 Nuxt.js 125.9× 1 Compare →
ems-dental.com 49 76 Nuxt.js 124.1× 0 Compare →
olab.com.mx 52 79 Nuxt.js 122.9× 1 Compare →
rtl-super.de 45 72 Nuxt.js 125.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to follow.it. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Follow?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Follow does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Follow work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Follow."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for follow.it:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

2.4
AI-Trust
#1125
Global Rank
38%
Percentile
22
Inbound AI Links
6
Outbound AI Links
56
Avg Inbound ACRI
9%
Invisible Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
occc.edu 78 0.0 ← cites you
greenmile.ru 67 0.0 ← cites you
digsdigs.com 65 0.0 ← cites you
sordum.org 64 0.0 ← cites you
economiafinancas.com 63 0.0 ← cites you
clubs1.bg 62 0.0 ← cites you
thebrickfan.com 61 0.0 ← cites you
weddingomania.com 60 0.0 ← cites you
49erswebzone.com 59 0.0 ← cites you
shelterness.com 58 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →