feed.fm 67 C
🛡️ SEO 44 🤖 GEO 76 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 86

feed.fm — Global SEODiff Score 67/100

feed.fm
📊

feed.fm achieves a 66/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the infrastructure sector, feed.fm outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The 5.0× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

67
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (44) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 3, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than feed.fm?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)44 × 0.25 = 11.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)76 × 0.40 = 30.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)86 × 0.15 = 12.9
Weighted sum = 11.0 + 30.4 + 13.0 + 12.9
Global SEODiff Score = 67 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
32
Structure
avg 36
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #73164
+36 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 43%
Score 66/100

feed.fm punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why feed.fm ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

44/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

149 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 3
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 16
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.feed.fm
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Music for Apps: Licensed, Curated & Ready to Engage | Feed.fm
  • ✓ og:description — Licensed music for apps made easy. The Feed.fm unified music system (UMS) is your music licensing solution for businesses and apps. Get music faster.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

76/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
feed.fm
49
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 32/100 — Low
Structured Elements 42 elements (42 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1391
Raw Density3.0%
💡Low structure score (32/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 42 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

20%
🗑️ 80%
Useful Content (27.5 KB)Bloat (109.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context96% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage50 / 52 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 80.0% · SNR: 0.25 · Signal: 7027 / Noise: 28063 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of feed.fm and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Feed Media Group provides a B2B music streaming service that offers a unified music system (UMS) for businesses to legally
Target Audience
Marketing managers, brand managers, product managers, music curators, and businesses in fitness, wellness, healthcare, and related industries.
Pricing Model
Not explicitly stated, but implied to be B2B subscription-based, with tiered pricing based on usage and features.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive licensing, curated music catalog, and a unified music system offering seamless integration across various digital experiences.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Blog: Music Tech, Trends, Curation and More!Guide: Music Streaming for Businesses
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Complexity of music licensing
• Lack of seamless integration with digital experiences
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time715 ms
Raw HTML Size137.1 KB
Visible Text Size27.5 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

715 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

909
DOM nodes
137 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → s-maxage=36000, max-age=5
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

3
tracker scripts
3
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comcrazyegg.comhubspot.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

86/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

82
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 49/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for feed.fm
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/feed.fm" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=feed.fm" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 51 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
49
Single-page score
+8
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
57
Avg across 51 pages · Range 36–77
Topical Cohesion
12%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
47299
Avg Bloat
33.8×
RAG Fractures [?]
6
⚠️
6 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 6 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.feed.fm/music-curation-for-fitness
Music curation for fitness | Feed.fm
other 77 5.9× 2065
https://www.feed.fm/2024-app-engagement-survey
2024 consumer survey
other 77 7.9× 1360
https://www.feed.fm/2024-workout-music-report
2024 Wellness & Workout Music Report | Feed.fm
pricing 72 16.3× 1917 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/radio
Feed Radio Music for Apps | Feed.fm
pricing 67 25.8× 962 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/customer-stories-ergatta
How Ergatta Created the Game-Based Digital Fitness Category | Feed.fm
pricing 67 13.2× 792 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/voices-behind-the-music
Voices Behind the Music Podcast with Jeff Yasuda | FMG
other 67 11.1× 1268
https://www.feed.fm/customer-stories-sworkit
Double User Retention With Integrated Music | Feed.fm
pricing 67 12.5× 883 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/originals/terms-and-conditions
Standard Terms and Conditions | Feed Originals
pricing 67 12.9× 2720 💰 Pricing
https://feed.fm/products
Licensed Music Solutions for Apps | Feed.fm
pricing 64 17.2× 1086 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/products
Licensed Music Solutions for Apps | Feed.fm
pricing 64 17.2× 1086 💰 Pricing
https://feed.fm/blog
Blog | Feed.fm
pricing 64 19.5× 5844 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/productoverview
Music API for streaming commercial music in your app | Feed.fm
pricing 64 15.2× 837 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/music-curation-for-fitness-preview
Music curation for fitness
other 64 15.1× 531
https://www.feed.fm/music-system-for-smart-devices
A Smart Music System for Smart Devices | Feed.fm
pricing 64 19.8× 1202 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/science-backed-music
Science-backed music | Feed.fm functional music catalog Feed OriginalsResponsive Image Tiles GridAudio Tile GridResponsive Image Tiles GridAudio Tile Grid
pricing 64 31.8× 1413 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.feed.fm/originals-athletech
Feed Originals - Functional Music Flexible Licensing
pricing 64 48.8× 727 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/relaxing-music
Relaxing Music for Health and Wellness Businesses | Feed.fm
pricing 59 28.1× 643 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/sdk-overview
SDK Overview | Feed.fm
pricing 59 24.1× 666 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/curated-radio-packages-preview
Preview Curated Music Station Package for Apps | Feed.fm
pricing 59 23.2× 1892 💰 Pricing
https://www.feed.fm/music-rating-system
Music Rating System | Feed.fm
pricing 59 24.7× 565 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 51 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/originals/ 4 51 0% 42.8× High JS Bloat
/products/ 2 64 0% 17.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 2 56 0% 42.4× High JS Bloat
/careers-engineering-manager/ 1 56 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/engaging-music-for-faith-based-apps/ 1 46 0% 42.4× High JS Bloat
/clips/ 1 56 0% 36.1× High JS Bloat
/motivate-app-users-with-music/ 1 46 0% 43.3× High JS Bloat
/music-curation-for-fitness-preview/ 1 64 0% 15.1× High JS Bloat
/global-wellness-music-for-apps/ 1 56 0% 36.0× High JS Bloat
/wellness-music/ 1 56 0% 30.8× High JS Bloat
/hospitality-music-solutions-for-better-guest-experiences/ 1 46 0% 41.0× High JS Bloat
/music-system-for-smart-devices/ 1 64 0% 19.8× High JS Bloat
/science-backed-music/ 1 64 0% 31.8× High JS Bloat
/curated-radio-packages-preview/ 1 59 0% 23.1× High JS Bloat
/customers/ 1 56 0% 31.4× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/feed.fm

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to feed.fm. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
feed.fm (this site) 49 66 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 1
bijindoll.com 74 78 Custom / Proprietary 5.7× 2 Compare →
support.oneidentity.com 74 79 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 0 Compare →
siber.yalova.edu.tr 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 0 Compare →
zielonalazienka.pl 74 82 Custom / Proprietary 5.6× 3 Compare →
kisa.or.kr 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite feed.fm when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to feed.fm. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Feed",
  "url": "https://feed.fm",
  "logo": "https://www.feed.fm/hubfs/RGB_feed.fm_icon_aqua.svg",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Feed",
  "url": "https://feed.fm",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://feed.fm/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Feed?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Feed does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Feed work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Feed."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for feed.fm:

Current Score
66
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history