exam.net 60 C
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 66

exam.net — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

exam.net
📊

exam.net achieves a 73/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), exam.net performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The 5.4× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (27) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than exam.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)66 × 0.15 = 9.9
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 30.0 + 5.4 + 9.9
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
45
Structure
avg 36
2
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #65848
+18 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 24%
Score 73/100

exam.net punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why exam.net ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

59 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

129 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 17
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://exam.net/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Secure platform for online exams and assessments - Exam.net
  • ✓ og:description — Create and conduct online exams in the classroom or remotely. Made by teachers who understand the the realities of the classroom.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
exam.net
57
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 45/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 205 elements (205 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words3308
Raw Density6.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

58
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability58/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

18%
🗑️ 82%
Useful Content (60.8 KB)Bloat (267.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.4× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context16% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage18 / 110 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 16% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 81.5% · SNR: 0.23 · Signal: 15556 / Noise: 68497 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of exam.net and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Exam.net provides intuitive tools for teachers to create and administer online assessments, streamlining the exam process and improving student learning.
Target Audience
Teachers, educators, school administrators, higher education institutions
Pricing Model
Pricing information available on the website – tiered plans based on features and usage.
🔗 Integration Partners
LMSTeachiq
🏆 Competitive Moat
Teacher-centric design and development, leveraging expertise from educators to create user-friendly and effective assessment tools.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
BlogTestimonials
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited information on pricing
• Lack of detailed feature descriptions beyond the overview
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time4478 ms
Raw HTML Size328.3 KB
Visible Text Size60.8 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

4478 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1858
DOM nodes
328 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=60
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

66/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

141
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 57/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for exam.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/exam.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=exam.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 51 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
57
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
59
Avg across 51 pages · Range 54–72
Topical Cohesion
30%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
36367
Avg Bloat
84.4×
RAG Fractures [?]
51
⚠️
51 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 51 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://exam.net/blog
Blog - Online Exam Software - Exam.net
pricing 72 19.5× 2687 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/fr/pricing
Tarification - Logiciel d'examen en ligne - Exam.net
pricing 64 56.0× 681 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/it/pricing
Prezzi - Software di prova online - Exam.net
pricing 64 55.4× 687 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/pt/pricing
Preços - Software de exames online - Exam.net
pricing 64 58.8× 646 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/pricing
Pricing - Online Exam Software - Exam.net
pricing 64 60.9× 619 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/de/pricing
Preisgestaltung - Online-Prüfungssoftware - Exam.net
pricing 64 62.5× 609 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/es/pricing
Precios - Software de exámenes en línea - Exam.net
pricing 64 55.9× 681 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/nl/pricing
Prijzen - Online examensoftware - Exam.net
pricing 64 58.8× 645 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/fr/blog/from-overhead-projectors-to-ai-transforming-education-with-technology
Des rétroprojecteurs à l'IA : transformer l'éducation grâce à la technologie - Exam.net
pricing 64 40.3× 889 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/nl/blog/from-overhead-projectors-to-ai-transforming-education-with-technology
Van overheadprojectoren tot AI: onderwijs transformeren met technologie - Exam.net
pricing 64 41.1× 867 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/pt/blog/from-overhead-projectors-to-ai-transforming-education-with-technology
Dos retroprojetores à IA: transformando a educação com a tecnologia - Exam.net
pricing 64 41.2× 866 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/sv/blog/from-overhead-projectors-to-ai-transforming-education-with-technology
Från overheadprojektorer till AI: Att förändra utbildning med teknik - Exam.net
pricing 64 42.3× 842 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/blog/from-overhead-projectors-to-ai-transforming-education-with-technology
From Overhead Projectors to AI: Transforming Education with Technology - Exam.net
pricing 64 45.0× 786 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/de/blog/from-overhead-projectors-to-ai-transforming-education-with-technology
Von Overhead-Projektoren bis zu künstlicher Intelligenz: Bildung durch Technologie - Exam.net
pricing 64 46.0× 777 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/es/blog/from-overhead-projectors-to-ai-transforming-education-with-technology
De los retroproyectores a la inteligencia artificial: transformar la educación con tecnología - Exam.net
pricing 64 40.5× 883 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/it/blog/from-overhead-projectors-to-ai-transforming-education-with-technology
Dai proiettori all'intelligenza artificiale: trasformare l'istruzione con la tecnologia - Exam.net
pricing 64 39.4× 909 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/about
About - Digital Exam Software - Exam.net
pricing 64 61.4× 529 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/features
Secure platform for online exams and assessments - Exam.net
pricing 64 28.2× 2386 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/products
Secure platform for online exams and assessments - Exam.net
pricing 64 28.2× 2386 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://exam.net/docs
Secure platform for online exams and assessments - Exam.net
pricing 64 28.2× 2386 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 51 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 7 58 0% 83.5× High JS Bloat
/sv/ 5 56 0% 101.8× High JS Bloat
/fr/ 5 58 0% 89.4× High JS Bloat
/it/ 5 58 0% 89.5× High JS Bloat
/pt/ 5 58 0% 89.3× High JS Bloat
/de/ 5 58 0% 97.5× High JS Bloat
/es/ 5 58 0% 88.6× High JS Bloat
/nl/ 5 58 0% 93.9× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 64 0% 28.2× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 60.9× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 64 0% 28.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 64 0% 28.2× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 61.4× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 64 0% 28.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 54 0% 155.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 51 pages
getapp.com ×51
maths.exam.net ×51
capterra.com ×51
status.exam.net ×51
linkedin.com ×51
support.exam.net ×51
www2.nzqa.govt.nz ×8
forms.gle ×7
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/exam.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to exam.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
exam.net (this site) 57 73 WordPress 5.4× 1
subpng.com 82 90 WordPress 5.5× 2 Compare →
groepen.nl 82 90 WordPress 3.3× 2 Compare →
reidasmultimidias.com.br 82 93 WordPress 5.3× 31 Compare →
mymc.jp 82 91 WordPress 4.4× 7 Compare →
goossenswonen.be 82 88 Cloudflare Pages 2.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite exam.net when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to exam.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Exam",
  "url": "https://exam.net",
  "logo": "https://cdn2.exam.net/website-2025-11-05/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Examnet-Square-Logo-Icon-128x128-1.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Exam?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Exam does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Exam work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Exam."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for exam.net:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+12 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history