einfomax.co.kr 56 D
🛡️ SEO 37 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 58

einfomax.co.kr — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

einfomax.co.kr
📊

einfomax.co.kr achieves a 77/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the infrastructure sector, einfomax.co.kr outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 5.6× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (27) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than einfomax.co.kr?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)37 × 0.25 = 9.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)58 × 0.15 = 8.7
Weighted sum = 9.2 + 32.4 + 5.4 + 8.7
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
53
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #55621
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

einfomax.co.kr shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why einfomax.co.kr ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

37/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

18 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

115 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 17
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://news.einfomax.co.kr
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 연합인포맥스
  • ✓ og:description — 금융정보 전문업체, 인터넷 실시간 뉴스정보, 금융생방송 프로그램, 고객지원 등 안내.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
einfomax.co.kr
59
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 53/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 145 elements (145 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1752
Raw Density8.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

69
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability69/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

17%
🗑️ 83%
Useful Content (28.6 KB)Bloat (132.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.6× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context27% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage3 / 11 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 27% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 82.2% · SNR: 0.22 · Signal: 7312 / Noise: 33779 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2429 ms
Raw HTML Size160.5 KB
Visible Text Size28.6 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2429 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1562
DOM nodes
160 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

58/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

291
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 59/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for einfomax.co.kr
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/einfomax.co.kr" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=einfomax.co.kr" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 20 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
59
Single-page score
+11
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
70
Avg across 20 pages · Range 70–70
Total Words
28200
Avg Bloat
23.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://einfomax.co.kr/pricing
연합인포맥스
pricing 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/guides
연합인포맥스
blog 70 23.1× 1437
https://einfomax.co.kr/help
연합인포맥스
support 70 23.1× 1437
https://einfomax.co.kr/about
연합인포맥스
about 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/resources
연합인포맥스
blog 70 23.1× 1437
https://einfomax.co.kr/solutions
연합인포맥스
product 70 23.1× 1437
https://einfomax.co.kr/features
연합인포맥스
product 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/products
연합인포맥스
product 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/blog
연합인포맥스
blog 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/docs
연합인포맥스
docs 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/demo
연합인포맥스
conversion 70 23.1× 1437
https://einfomax.co.kr/case-studies
연합인포맥스
social-proof 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/get-started
연합인포맥스
conversion 70 23.1× 1437
https://einfomax.co.kr/support
연합인포맥스
support 70 23.1× 1437
https://einfomax.co.kr/integrations
연합인포맥스
integrations 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/faq
연합인포맥스
support 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/contact
연합인포맥스
support 70 23.8× 1383
https://einfomax.co.kr/security
연합인포맥스
trust 70 23.1× 1437
https://einfomax.co.kr/trust
연합인포맥스
trust 70 23.1× 1437
https://einfomax.co.kr/careers
연합인포맥스
careers 70 23.1× 1437
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 70 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 70 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 70 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 70 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 1 70 0% 23.1× High JS Bloat
/careers/ 1 70 0% 23.1× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 70 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
/trust/ 1 70 0% 23.1× High JS Bloat
/support/ 1 70 0% 23.1× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 70 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 70 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 70 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
/get-started/ 1 70 0% 23.1× High JS Bloat
/resources/ 1 70 0% 23.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 70 0% 23.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 20 pages
news.einfomax.co.kr ×20
instagram.com ×20
ndsoft.co.kr ×20
infox2.infomaxai.com ×20
youtube.com ×20
yonhap.einfomax.co.kr ×20
go.einfomax.co.kr ×20
blog.naver.com ×20
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/einfomax.co.kr

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to einfomax.co.kr. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
einfomax.co.kr (this site) 59 77 Custom / Proprietary 5.6× 1
motocare.co.in 84 91 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 1 Compare →
multicanalatacado.com.br 84 92 Custom / Proprietary 1.3× 1 Compare →
goiasatacado.com.br 84 92 Custom / Proprietary 1.3× 1 Compare →
termix.ro 84 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 3 Compare →
tekarom.com 84 87 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite einfomax.co.kr when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to einfomax.co.kr. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://einfomax.co.kr",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://einfomax.co.kr/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Co?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Co does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Co work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Co."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for einfomax.co.kr:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history