domaintools.com 69 C
🛡️ SEO 84 🤖 GEO 64 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 99

domaintools.com — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

domaintools.com
📊

With a solid 79/100 ACRI, domaintools.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 91% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), domaintools.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 38.2× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (38×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than domaintools.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)84 × 0.25 = 21.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)64 × 0.40 = 25.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)99 × 0.15 = 14.8
Weighted sum = 21.0 + 25.6 + 7.8 + 14.8
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
26
Structure
avg 36
82
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.3%
Rank #3406
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

domaintools.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why domaintools.com ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat38.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

84/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

60 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

154 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.domaintools.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Threat Intelligence & Domain Security Platform | DomainTools
  • ✓ og:description — DomainTools provides DNS-based threat intelligence covering 97% of internet infrastructure. Detect, investigate & block malicious domains. Request a demo.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

64/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
domaintools.com
54
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 26/100 — Low
Structured Elements 24 elements (24 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1181
Raw Density2.0%
💡Low structure score (26/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 24 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (65/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (8.4 KB)Bloat (311.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio38.2× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context98% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage80 / 82 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 319.5 KB, but only 8.4 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (38.2×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.4% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 2143 / Noise: 79654 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of domaintools.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Comprehensive, predictive DNS threat intelligence data for enterprise security
Target Audience
Enterprises, governments, security platforms
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Transforming raw DNS indicators into actionable insights for security teams
📊 Content Depth
5/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1113 ms
Raw HTML Size319.5 KB
Visible Text Size8.4 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1113 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2394
DOM nodes
320 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

99/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.domaintools.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

114
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 54/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for domaintools.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/domaintools.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=domaintools.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1000 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
54
Single-page score
+8
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
62
Avg across 1000 pages · Range 26–85
Topical Cohesion
11%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1091224
Avg Bloat
80.2×
RAG Fractures [?]
999
⚠️
999 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 999 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/need-a-new-pc-buy-one-thats-prebuilt-rather-than-building-one-yourself
Prebuilt vs Custom PCs: Which Should You Buy? | DomainTools
pricing 85 5.3× 9904 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/using-dnsdb-flexible-search-to-find-matching-rdata-in-txt-records
Finding TXT Record Matches with Flexible Search
pricing 85 8.7× 5631 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/volume-over-time-data-from-dnsdb-export-mtbl-files-part-two-of-three-part-series
Volume-Over-Time Data From DNSDB Export MTBL Files (Part Two of Three-Part Series) - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 85 8.2× 6010 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/a-second-approach-to-automating-detection-of-random-looking-domain-names-neural-networks-deep-learning
A Second Approach To Automating Detection of "Random-Looking" Domain Names: Neural Networks/Deep Learning - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 85 6.5× 8222 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/automating-detection-of-random-looking-algorithmic-domain-names
Automating Detection of "Random-Looking" Algorithmic Domain Names - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 85 9.1× 5070 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/finding-additional-indicators-with-passive-dns-within-domaintools-iris
Finding More Indicators via Passive DNS in DomainTools Iris
pricing 85 9.3× 4892 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/getting-a-running-start-with-the-nvidia-jetson-nano
Getting a Running Start with the NVIDIA Jetson Nano - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 85 8.9× 5218 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/going-from-an-ip-address-to-a-fully-qualified-domain-name-fqdn-in-dnsdb
From IP to FQDN Using Farsight DNSDB at DomainTools
pricing 85 8.3× 5561 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/how-are-the-results-from-a-dnsdb-standard-search-ordered
How DNSDB Search Results Are Ordered
pricing 85 9.5× 5002 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/policies/enterprise-subscription-agreement
DomainTools
pricing 77 9.0× 4330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/policies/standard-contractual-clauses-customer-employees-agents
DomainTools
pricing 77 5.3× 8187 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/policies/standard-contractual-clauses-customer-queries
DomainTools
pricing 77 5.4× 8149 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/analyzing-network-infrastructure-as-composite-objects
Analyzing Network Infrastructure as Composite Objects - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 75 14.8× 2833 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/435-million-certificates-and-counting
435 Million Certificates and Counting - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 75 20.0× 2157 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/caught-in-the-act-a-phishing-expedition
Caught in the Act: A Phishing Expedition - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 75 14.3× 2972 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/exposing-possible-campaigns-with-domaincat
Exposing Possible Campaigns with DomainCAT - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 75 13.6× 3064 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/passive-dns-and-sie-file-formats
Passive DNS and SIE File Formats - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 75 12.7× 3452 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/record-typenull-records-in-dnsdb-mtbl-files
RECORD TYPE=NULL Records In DNSDB Mtbl Files - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 75 15.4× 2750 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/tracking-a-trickbot-related-ransomware-incident
Holiday Bazar: Tracking a TrickBot-Related Ransomware Incident - DomainTools | Start Here. Know Now.
pricing 75 16.4× 2659 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.domaintools.com/blog/valuable-datasets-to-analyze-network-infrastructure-part-2
Valuable Datasets to Analyze Network Infrastructure | Part 2
pricing 75 12.8× 3395 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 329 69 0% 27.8× High JS Bloat
/podcasts/ 166 66 0% 32.7× High JS Bloat
/policies/ 4 74 0% 8.3× High JS Bloat
/company/ 1 67 0% 30.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1000 pages
docs.domaintools.com ×1000
research.domaintools.com ×999
dti.domaintools.com ×999
infosec.exchange ×998
rss.app ×998
bsky.app ×998
account.domaintools.com ×998
linkedin.com ×998
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/domaintools.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to domaintools.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
domaintools.com (this site) 54 79 Cloudflare Pages 38.2× 1
1win-bet.kz 79 84 Cloudflare Pages 1.9× 6 Compare →
vassermans.ru 79 84 Cloudflare Pages 1.9× 6 Compare →
goodfortune.jp 79 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 1 Compare →
th.scsglobalservices.com 79 82 Drupal 3.3× 1 Compare →
whitefriday.sa 79 81 Laravel 1.6× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

64
Homepage ACRI
51
Inner Avg ACRI
+13
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
40%
Inner Avg Ghost
24
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
54 40% pricing https://domaintools.com/integrations
44 40% pricing https://domaintools.com/contact
54 40% pricing https://www.domaintools.com/blog/nothing-compares-to-cpu
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 25/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Named leadership: Kelsey LaBelle, Kelsey LaBelle, DomainTools
🔗

Citation Profile

19 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

159
Total Links
19
Unique Domains
10.6
Avg/Page
12%
Diversity
account.domaintools.com bsky.app rss.app infosec.exchange research.domaintools.com linkedin.com dti.domaintools.com docs.domaintools.com x.com facebook.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 33.3

AI trust scores for the domains domaintools.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to domaintools.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Domaintools?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Domaintools does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Domaintools work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Domaintools."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for domaintools.com:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history