decisions.com 70 B
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 83

decisions.com — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

decisions.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for decisions.com is strong: an ACRI of 80/100 places it ahead of 94% of domains in the index. In the infrastructure sector, decisions.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 8.4× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (53) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 6, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 6
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than decisions.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 32.4 + 10.6 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
53
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #50795
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

decisions.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why decisions.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat8.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

36 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

136 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://decisions.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Code less. Achieve more. - Decisions
  • ✓ og:description — Build software that moves beyond rules engines and workflow management to improve and accelerate any business process. No code required.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
decisions.com
60
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 53/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 103 elements (103 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1241
Raw Density8.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

63
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability63/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (40/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

11%
🗑️ 89%
Useful Content (17.8 KB)Bloat (132.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio8.4× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context99% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage85 / 86 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 88.1% · SNR: 0.13 · Signal: 4553 / Noise: 33781 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of decisions.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Decisions is a low-code automation platform combining a drag-and-drop designer with a powerful rules engine to enable both developers and
Target Audience
Business users, developers, IT teams, process analysts, operations managers
Pricing Model
Not specified - platform-based pricing with potential tiers based on usage and features.
🔗 Integration Partners
AWSAzureKafkaRabbitMQMSMQSQL ServerOracle
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique combination of a rules engine at the core, drag-and-drop UI Designer for business users, and seamless system integration – enabling agility without complexity.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1800 ms
Raw HTML Size149.7 KB
Visible Text Size17.8 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1800 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

860
DOM nodes
150 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → BYPASS
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://decisions.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

122
internal links
11
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 60/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for decisions.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/decisions.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=decisions.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 67 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
60
Single-page score
-11
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 67 pages · Range 40–77
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 60, but internal pages average only 50 — a -11-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
11%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
30260
Avg Bloat
144.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://decisions.com/faq
FAQs | Learn About the Decisions Automation Platform
pricing 77 13.7× 2787 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/customer-use-cases/
Decisions Customer Use Cases
pricing 75 16.2× 3866 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/company/
Helping you automate anything and change everything. - Decisions
pricing 72 13.5× 2289 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/pricing
Pricing - Decisions
pricing 69 23.9× 1503 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/pricing/
Pricing - Decisions
pricing 69 23.9× 1503 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/blog/
Blog - Decisions
pricing 64 36.0× 802 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/ai-orchestration/
AI Orchestration - Decisions
pricing 64 48.0× 598 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/adaptable-accelerated-loan-origination/
Adaptable, accelerated loan origination. - Decisions
pricing 64 54.1× 527 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/lead-management/
Lead Management - Decisions
pricing 64 37.6× 774 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/credit-card-origination/
Credit Card Origination - Decisions
pricing 64 36.3× 801 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/customers/
Transforming businesses, one Decision at a time. - Decisions
pricing 64 40.1× 796 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/post-closing-orchestration/
Post-Closing Orchestration - Decisions
pricing 64 46.2× 617 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/healthcare/
Design seamless patient experiences. - Decisions
pricing 64 55.4× 519 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/blog
Blog - Decisions
pricing 64 36.0× 802 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/case-studies
Transforming businesses, one Decision at a time. - Decisions
pricing 64 40.1× 796 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/specialty-insurance-process-automation/lloyds-syndicates-insurance-automation/
Lloyd’s Syndicates Insurance Automation - Decisions
pricing 54 71.5× 394 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/financial-services/
Automation Solutions for Financial Services Firms
pricing 54 62.9× 452 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/specialty-insurance-process-automation/excess-surplus-insurance/
Excess & Surplus Insurance - Decisions
pricing 54 68.8× 410 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/expand-capabilities-elevate-value/
Expand capabilities. Elevate value. - Decisions
pricing 54 81.4× 333 💰 Pricing
https://decisions.com/solutions/student-appeal-and-exception-requests/
Student appeal and exception requests - Decisions
pricing 54 69.8× 404 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 67 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/solutions/ 56 47 1% 145.6× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 2 69 0% 23.9× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 2 64 0% 36.0× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 64 0% 40.1× High JS Bloat
/topic/ 1 51 1% 81.7× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 51 1% 82.6× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 50 1% 868.0× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 40 1% 283.7× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 77 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/company/ 1 72 0% 13.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 67 pages
linkedin.com ×67
youtube.com ×67
facebook.com ×67
releases.decisions.com ×67
documentation.decisions.com ×67
prnewswire.com ×66
community.decisions.com ×66
reddit.com ×66
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/decisions.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to decisions.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
decisions.com (this site) 60 80 WordPress 8.4× 1
sbba.or.jp 85 90 WordPress 2.1× 1 Compare →
derolfgroep.nl 85 89 WordPress 1.8× 2 Compare →
ilfriuli.it 85 90 WordPress 3.4× 3 Compare →
kingoftime.jp 85 91 WordPress 2.8× 4 Compare →
rupes.com 85 97 WordPress 11.2× 16 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite decisions.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to decisions.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Decisions",
  "url": "https://decisions.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://decisions.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Decisions?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Decisions does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Decisions work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Decisions."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for decisions.com:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history