decca.com 64 C
🛡️ SEO 73 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 49 🏗️ Arch 73

decca.com — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

decca.com
📊

The AI-Readiness score for decca.com is 64/100 — a middling result that leaves significant room to climb the Radar rankings. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), decca.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The 13.9× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Some AI crawlers are permitted while others are blocked — a mixed robots.txt policy that limits visibility in certain AI ecosystems.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (49) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than decca.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)73 × 0.25 = 18.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)49 × 0.20 = 9.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)73 × 0.15 = 10.9
Weighted sum = 18.2 + 24.8 + 9.8 + 10.9
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #508667
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 47%
Score 64/100

decca.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why decca.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat13.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

73/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

13 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

71 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.decca.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Decca Records
  • ✓ og:description — Decca Records part of Universal Music Group. The home of diverse music.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
decca.com
38
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words653
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

43
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability43/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (5.2 KB)Bloat (67.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio13.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage11 / 11 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.8% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 1333 / Noise: 17181 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Serveristio-envoy
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2342 ms
Raw HTML Size72.3 KB
Visible Text Size5.2 KB

Performance & Speed

49/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2342 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

464
DOM nodes
72 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

73/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.decca.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
20
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 38/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for decca.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/decca.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=decca.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
38
Single-page score
-4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
34
Avg across 10 pages · Range 34–34
Total Words
20
Avg Bloat
7406.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://decca.com/pricing
Decca Records
pricing 34 7405.9× 2
https://decca.com/about
Decca Records
about 34 7405.9× 2
https://decca.com/products
Decca Records
product 34 7405.9× 2
https://decca.com/features
Decca Records
product 34 7406.0× 2
https://decca.com/docs
Decca Records
docs 34 7406.1× 2
https://decca.com/blog
Decca Records
blog 34 7406.0× 2
https://decca.com/case-studies
Decca Records
social-proof 34 7406.1× 2
https://decca.com/integrations
Decca Records
integrations 34 7406.0× 2
https://decca.com/contact
Decca Records
support 34 7406.1× 2
https://decca.com/faq
Decca Records
support 34 7406.0× 2
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/features/ 1 34 0% 7406.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 34 0% 7406.0× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 34 0% 7406.1× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 34 0% 7406.1× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 34 0% 7405.9× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 34 0% 7405.9× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 34 0% 7405.9× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 34 0% 7406.1× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 34 0% 7406.0× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 34 0% 7406.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
decca.lnk.to ×10
shop.deccarecordsus.com ×10
instagram.com ×10
hyperion-records.co.uk ×10
mercurykx.com ×10
youtube.com ×10
twitter.com ×10
privacy.universalmusic.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/decca.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to decca.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
decca.com (this site) 38 64 WordPress 13.9× 1
bxbmarket.com 63 80 WordPress 12.1× 1 Compare →
metropormetro.com 63 81 WordPress 12.3× 2 Compare →
esquelas.lasprovincias.es 63 84 WordPress 15.8× 2 Compare →
betustv.com 63 80 WordPress 7.7× 1 Compare →
elpesebre.net 63 76 WordPress 20.2× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to decca.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Decca?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Decca does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Decca work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Decca."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for decca.com:

Current Score
64
Projected Score
80
Improvement
+16 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history