csmonitor.com 42 D
🛡️ SEO 25 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 79

csmonitor.com — Global SEODiff Score 42/100

csmonitor.com
📊

csmonitor.com struggles with AI visibility, recording a critical ACRI of 15/100 — AI crawlers face significant hurdles extracting its content. In the infrastructure sector, csmonitor.com underperforms relative to the average (58), indicating room for competitive improvement. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Token bloat registers at 6.4× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are blocked by robots.txt — the site is effectively invisible to AI search.

42
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (25) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Allow GPTBot + ClaudeBot in robots.txt → lift the score cap
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 25 snapshots
Feb 21 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than csmonitor.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)25 × 0.25 = 6.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 6.2 + 30.8 + 10.6 + 11.8
⚠️ Fatal multiplier: All major AI bots blocked → ×0.5
Global SEODiff Score = 42 (D)
🚫
Gatekeeper Rule: Score cannot exceed 15. Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot are blocked in robots.txt. No major AI assistant can cite this site. Allow at least one major AI crawler to lift the cap. See Bot Access →
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
20
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
55
Structure
avg 36
4
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.5%
Rank #5160
+67 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 67%
Score 15/100

csmonitor.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why csmonitor.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat6.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

25/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

41 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.csmonitor.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Christian Science Monitor
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
csmonitor.com
50
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 55/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 155 elements (155 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1717
Raw Density9.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
✅ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

58
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Critical
Blocklist Risk
Extractability58/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskCritical — 4 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

15%
🗑️ 85%
Useful Content (16.8 KB)Bloat (91.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.4× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context18% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage11 / 62 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 18% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 84.5% · SNR: 0.18 · Signal: 4300 / Noise: 23434 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1480 ms
Raw HTML Size108.3 KB
Visible Text Size16.8 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1480 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1351
DOM nodes
108 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, s-maxage=30
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.csmonitor.com/sitemap-index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

162
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 50/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for csmonitor.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/csmonitor.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=csmonitor.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 400 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
50
Single-page score
+13
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
63
Avg across 400 pages · Range 47–90
Topical Cohesion
2%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
202613
Avg Bloat
23.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Contributor-guidelines
Contributors’ guidelines - CSMonitor.com
about 90 4.9× 1627
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Monitor-Daily
What is The Christian Science Monitor Daily? - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
about 90 4.9× 1799
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Privacy
Privacy Policy - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
about 90 2.7× 4667
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Terms
Terms - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
pricing 90 3.3× 3433 💰 Pricing
https://www.csmonitor.com/Specials/Hostage-The-Jill-Carroll-Story/Cast-of-Characters
Cast of Characters - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
other 90 4.5× 2685
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Subscription-FAQ
Subscription FAQ - CSMonitor.com
about 87 3.7× 3091
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Careers
Careers - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
about 85 9.8× 675
https://csmonitor.com/about
About us - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
about 85 8.2× 932
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Monitor-Weekly
What is The Christian Science Monitor Weekly? - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
about 85 5.1× 1652
https://www.csmonitor.com/About
About us - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
about 85 8.2× 932
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Contributor-guidelines/Contributor-Guidelines-International-news
Contributor's Guidelines: International news - CSMonitor.com
pricing 85 8.6× 824 💰 Pricing
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Contributor-guidelines/Contributor-Guidelines-The-Home-Forum
Contributor's Guidelines: The Home Forum - CSMonitor.com
about 85 10.0× 684
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Terms/Churches-and-reading-rooms
Churches and reading rooms - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
about 85 9.0× 769
https://www.csmonitor.com/Podcasts/Why-We-Wrote-This
Why We Wrote This - CSMonitor.com
other 85 9.7× 1094
https://www.csmonitor.com/News-Briefs
News Briefs - CSMonitor.com
pricing 85 5.8× 2064 💰 Pricing
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Contributor-guidelines/Contributor-Guidelines-People-Making-a-Difference
Contributor’s Guidelines: People Making a Difference - CSMonitor.com
about 75 12.9× 510
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Offer/Meet-the-Monitor-Daily
Meet the Monitor Daily - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
about 75 13.4× 585
https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Contact/Newsroom-Directory
Newsroom Directory - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
pricing 75 13.6× 554 💰 Pricing
https://www.csmonitor.com/Podcasts/Tulsa-Rising
Tulsa Rising - CSMonitor.com
other 75 14.4× 643
https://www.csmonitor.com/Podcasts/The-Christian-Science-Monitor-Daily-Podcast
The Christian Science Monitor Daily Podcast - CSMonitor.com
pricing 75 11.1× 1183 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/World/ 128 69 0% 20.1× High JS Bloat
/USA/ 63 61 0% 25.0× High JS Bloat
/The-Culture/ 53 60 0% 26.4× High JS Bloat
/About/ 39 67 0% 20.0× High JS Bloat
/Business/ 29 55 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/Science/ 21 57 0% 30.7× High JS Bloat
/Technology/ 12 57 0% 27.0× High JS Bloat
/Environment/ 11 57 0% 27.8× High JS Bloat
/Specials/ 11 64 0% 24.1× High JS Bloat
/Editorials/ 10 59 0% 25.4× High JS Bloat
/Podcasts/ 8 74 0% 16.2× High JS Bloat
/Books/ 6 57 0% 25.4× High JS Bloat
/The-Home-Forum/ 2 66 0% 19.1× High JS Bloat
/EqualEd/ 2 57 0% 26.8× High JS Bloat
/News-Briefs/ 1 85 0% 5.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 400 pages
instagram.com ×400
linkedin.com ×400
twitter.com ×400
youtube.com ×400
facebook.com ×400
bsky.app ×399
csmonitorreprints.com ×399
open.spotify.com ×9
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/csmonitor.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to csmonitor.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
csmonitor.com (this site) 50 15 Custom / Proprietary 6.4× 2
geraka.com 75 85 Custom / Proprietary 5.8× 2 Compare →
heimkinoverein.de 75 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.6× 1 Compare →
calcuquote.com 75 79 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 3 Compare →
zakordon.rayon.in.ua 75 85 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 1 Compare →
melbournetourism.net.au 75 79 Custom / Proprietary 4.2× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

C 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

85
Homepage ACRI
54
Inner Avg ACRI
+31
ACRI Delta
0%
Homepage Ghost
16%
Inner Avg Ghost
25
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
47 20% about https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Contact/Feedback/Technical-questions
57 20% about https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Offer/JoinHoliday
57 20% about https://www.csmonitor.com/About/Offer/Give
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

B 60/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Address: 210 Massachusetts Avenue Boston, MA 02115 Subscription expired Your subscription to The Christian
🔗

Citation Profile

11 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

110
Total Links
11
Unique Domains
7.3
Avg/Page
10%
Diversity
bsky.app csmonitorreprints.com instagram.com facebook.com twitter.com youtube.com linkedin.com myaccount.christianscience.com mastodon.social flipboard.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 64.5

AI trust scores for the domains csmonitor.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to csmonitor.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Csmonitor",
  "url": "https://csmonitor.com",
  "logo": "https://csmonitor.com/bundles/csm/images/favicon/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Csmonitor",
  "url": "https://csmonitor.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://csmonitor.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is blocked — Claude cannot cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Csmonitor?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Csmonitor does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Csmonitor work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Csmonitor."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for csmonitor.com:

Current Score
15
Projected Score
44
Improvement
+29 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history